Clarification on “endo-neutral” because people keep misreading it:
When I say I’m endogenic-neutral, I do not mean I support or believe in endogenic systems.
I’m traumagenic. I firmly believe trauma is required to form a system with alters. I’m not talking about CDDs, DID/OSDD, C-PTSD debates, or spiritual frameworks like Buddhism; those are separate conversations and already well-established. I mean alters, full stop.
My “neutral” stance is purely about engagement, not belief.
I don’t agree with endogenic theory, but I also don’t care enough to argue with people about it because it does not affect my life. Trying to convince strangers on the internet otherwise is, frankly, a waste of time and energy I don’t have.
That same logic applies in the other direction: I understand where anti-endo people are coming from, but I do not support harassment, dogpiling, or suicide-baiting; which I have seen happen. At that point, the discourse isn’t advocacy, it’s just cruelty with a moral badge.
Realistically, I cannot control who interacts with my posts. I’m not going to comb through every account that likes, reblogs, or replies to check their stance; that is, again, a waste of my time and energy. Because of that, I don’t tag my posts as #endo neutral, and I also don’t see the point in aggressive tags like #endos fuck off. I’m not running background checks or managing a blacklist.
This is not an invitation to debate me.
It’s a boundary and a statement of how I choose to spend my energy.
If you interpret every opinion as an argument request, that’s a you problem. I will ignore you or roast you depending on my mood.
