mayakovsky has this trick of retreating from bold rhythmic innovation and improvisation (kornei chukovsky called his lines in облако в штанах ‘rhythmic laws unto themselves’) into highly codified formal patterns that have a lot of history when he handles especially graphic + personal shit (especially in про это with the explicitly announced ballad and romance forms) and like, for a futurist (or famous former futurist) this has a kind of double function-- since tradition is assumed anathema under your name, you get to implicitly mock the form you’re using & its context and conventions & the reader for being familiar with it & yourself & the speaking character for using and defending it even as you mount that defense and get the support of literary precedent and formal distance to make your difficult content read (and write!) easier. this technique nets a great deal of ironic security for the author and readers in, like, the political/aesthetic in-group through witty aggression even as it invokes the blessings of certain canonical writer-figures (oscar wilde, the guitarist) and establishes a lineage. orients as it disorients











