H.B.M.C. said: ↑
Oh yeah, the holographic face things. No way would they ever be legal. EVER.
Err... why not? Covering one's face isn't a crime in most jurisdictions, and multiple religious groups use much more concealing facial covers than what the hologram projects.
Now, it is definitely an open question as to if they would be allowed to use it on official photo IDs. I'd expect not for things like Drivers Licenses... but a Student ID? They probably could get away with it on that.
Vaermina said: ↑
Why are the imagine inducers run off of a cloud system that allows remote control? :headdesk:
If I had to guess, it's likely because the image inducer itself is just a holoprojector and single program to sync movements of the hologram to that of the underlying features. It likely doesn't have the computational power to say, make adjustments to the hologram that a person might want to make. As such, there's likely an App on a person's phone or on a webpage you log into, put in your login information, and update your hologram settings, and then the holoprojector syncs to those new settings from the server.
And before you flip out about easy alterations, there's actually quite a few simply alterations that one would need to make regularly to fit in, especially if female. Lipstick, eye shadow, etc. For males you might want to sometimes have it showing five o'clock shadow, sometimes clean shaven. There would be a lot of little settings like that to help an alien pass as human that people would want to customize, and the simplest solution for that, logistically, would be a cloud set up. This would also make the end user devices cheaper too, as they wouldn't need as much computational power on the actual holoprojector.
Once you have this system in place, a high level developer's computer, like which was stolen, would have both the access and need to access those core systems and to make updates and alterations. This is one thing I'll grant them, the computer stolen for remote access wasn't just some rando's laptop, it was THE head developer's laptop, someone who very likely had all the access to all the systems and need to access those systems. Further, as lead developer, he'd be high enough ranked that he would be allowed certain privileges like teleworking (and also have a need to be able to remote access the servers in case of emergency). Speaking as someone who actually WORKS in IT Security and knows the US Federal Government's requirements better than most (since I, yanno, actually work on documentation explaining HOW State Department systems fulfill the NIST requirements), this hack is honestly one of the most legit ones I've seen on TV. The biggest issue I had was not with the hack itself, it was with LINA being the one to have to shut down the person's access to it... she, quite literally, should have an entire department dedicated to doing that job! Of course... she's also a Luthor, and they tend to be very hands on, so her having access to and knowing how to do that kind of thing is more excusable than most other corporate executives.
That said, glad they finally acknowledged the Constitutional issues with the former President. Honestly, the entire "in blatant violation of the Constitution" aspect of this entire thing severely undercut the entire message they were going for.