Cool moment from Chinese history:
Sun Bin was famous for two battles: Guling and Maling
In the first one the enemy was besieging a city, but instead of going to help that city directly, he pretends he's going to attack the enemy capital, forcing them to break the siege, they expected to fight Sun Bin there, but he never arrived, he had already accomplished his goal
In the second one he pretended he was weak so the enemy would chase him, but they just ran into a trap (it's more complex than that, obviously, but when you look at the details you see he was very clever)
Fast forward some 500 years to the battle of Guandu, and Cao Cao finds one of his fortresses being besieged, so he channels Sun Bin and he pretends his gonna attack the enemy capital, they break the siege, but not entirely. Sill Cao Cao is able to defeat the remaining troops at the siege and orders his forces inside the fortress to abandon it and fall back to a more defensible position. Hearing of this retreat the enemy sends a force to chase him down, but Cao leaves a lot of loot thrown around, as if they didn't have time to pick it up before running away, and the enemy gets distracted trying to pick it up, at which point he attacks and defeats them
In one battle Cao Cao replicated both of Sun's famous strategies. It almost feels like a homage
I know that war is a stupid waste of life and resources, but I must admit there's a certain appeal in strategy. It feels like math, but also art?
I often think that successful generals would have probably been good mathematicians, and that good mathematicians would have been very successful generals
In summary: Euler could have conquered the world