#susx

[charlotte-of-wales]

giving up shaking hands with world leaders, living in palaces and wearing priceless jewelry to post yourself twerking to the baby mama dance

[grits-gal-raised-in-the-south]

Now new court documents seen by The Times show that Sir Peter has refused Harry permission to appeal and also that the Home Office has been "penalised" for delaying the release of certain information - dubbed "crucial" by Harry's team - about the workings of Ravec - the committee that arranges security for members of the Royal Family and other VIPs.

Harry receives 10% discount on legal fees as Government punished for rule breach

The Duke of Sussex has been given a legal costs discount over the Home Office's rule breach, it has emerged.

Prince Harry was given a 10 percent discount on his legal fees in his High Court battle against the Home Office over his UK security after the Government was punished for delaying the provision of key documents, it has been reported.

The Duke of Sussex took legal action against the Home Office over the February 2020 decision that he should receive a different degree of protection when he returned to the UK after he quit his royal duties.

He lost the case back in February with High Court judge Sir Peter Lane finding that "there has not been any unlawfulness in reaching the decision" to revise his security, adding: "Any departure from the policy was justified. The decision was not irrational. The decision was not marred by procedural unfairness."

According to the newspaper, the Home Office failed to mention three categories of people for whom Ravec provides state protection when it should have legally done so.

The three categories are role-based individuals - like royals - other VIPs and those who need occasional support.

This meant the prince's legal team had not been made aware of the "other VIP" category, which, according to them, was crucial to his claim.

Harry's team initially sought "a reduction of 50-60 percent because of the way in which the documents and information were disclosed" by the Home Office.

Sir Lane said that while the Home Office had not acted in bad faith, "the defendant's breaches are, in all the circumstances, sanctionable".

[charlotte-of-wales]

wearing a poppy to kris jenner’s birthday party at the bezos’ mansion

[charlotte-of-wales]

on a lighter note

[charlotte-of-wales]

predictions for the sux's visit to the uk:

picture of the back of lili's head while she lays flowers down at diana's grave

family picture with charles + archie and lili face reveals

[charlotte-of-wales]

the funny thing about the ‘sussex is our family name 🥹’ thing is that the kids’ birth certificates say mountbatten-windsors. their passport, visas, future drivers licenses say mountbatten-windsors. if archie were to get married and pass on their name, the name to be passed down would be mountbatten-windsor.

this whole thing feels like a ‘take away our titles and you will take away our identity’ moment 2.0 a la marie of denmark and a way to justify their obsession with their titles

[charlotte-of-wales]

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/s/LgO3ArGg0s

Meghan has been hanging out and having dinner with a far right Finnish politician who has been accused of sexual assault, harassment and misconduct, and is a known racist who calls himself a Nazi.

[charlotte-of-wales]

pouring myself a drink after reading about the state visit + code ginger back to back