The full extent of Ribbe's assertions on the atrocities in Haiti is controversial, btw, but even at its "mildest" (i.e. his order to kill the men above 12 years of age), it's still an atrocity. Napoleon is not entirely evil - his contribution to the development of legal codes, for example, is admirable - but it is hypocritical to condemn Robespierre for his supposed atrocities while praising Napoleon and ignoring the atrocities that can be laid at his door.
For example - the massacre at Jaffa. Napoleon’s own private secretary, Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne, wrote of the thousands Napoleon had slain, saying “This atrocious scene, when I think of it, still makes me shudder, as it did on the day I beheld it; and I would wish it were possible for me to forget it, rather than be compelled to describe it. All the horrors imagination can conceive, relative to that day of blood, would fall short of the reality.” And that was a pro-Napoleonic source
I’m posting these for future reference. Apparently, another Napoleonic enthusiast has cast doubts on the validity of Ribbe’s work —- I’m unfamiliar with this area of historiography, so I can’t say until I start poking around for myself, but again: I’m taking note. Thank you everyone for the help!