seen from Australia
seen from Nepal
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Italy
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Poland
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
If you want an example of how crime is a social construct, consider this.
Briana Boston said "delay defend depose" to an insurance corp—she owns 0 guns, was arrested, charged with terrorism, & had to pay $100K bond
Brad Spafford had multiple illegal guns, 150 bombs, lied to the FBI, advocated assassinating Kamala, is NOT charged with terrorism, and had to pay a $25K bond
Empty words are "terrorism" but actual illegal bombs & guns are "free speech." Incredible.
“It was a complete circus, it was a carnival, a distraction from what’s actually going on," said Kneecap's Mo Chara in his first interview a
“It was a complete circus, it was a carnival, a distraction from what’s actually going on," said Kneecap's Mo Chara in his first interview after the terror charge against him was dismissed last week. Kneecap’s Mo Chara – real name Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh – is “definitely” considering legal action against the British state, following the dismissal of his terror charge last week. The Belfast rapper had been charged over an alleged incident where he reportedly waved a Hezbollah flag at a London gig last November. On Friday (26 September), the case was thrown out on a technicality, with Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring agreeing that the charge against Ó hAnnaidh fell outside the statute of limitations and telling the court that it was “unlawful” and “null”. Mo Chara and his Kneecap bandmates have consistently denounced Hezbollah and Hamas, two militant groups that are considered terrorist organizations by the United Kingdom, and said that they do not incite or condone violence. They have been vocal advocates for Palestinian rights and have used their platform to criticise Israel's actions in Gaza and those who condone genocide. They have also denied accusations of anti-Semitism, claiming that “those attacking us want to silence criticism of mass slaughter.” “This entire process was never about me,” Mo Chara told supporters outside the courthouse. "It was never about any threat to the public; it was never about terrorism - a word used by your government to discredit people you oppress.” “It was always about Gaza, about what happens if you dare to speak up,” he added.
continue reading
DRONES, DRONES, DRONES!!! WATCH OUT!!!
For over a decade, commercial and hobbyist drones have been buzzing through the skies without incident, yet suddenly people are losing their collective minds over this non-issue as if it's the harbinger of Armageddon. Are you all seriously this gullible? This isn't new technology—hell, we're talking about a military town with Fort Huachuca right there, the same Fort Huachuca that helped pioneer the use of surveillance drones in the first place. This isn’t Skynet coming online; it’s glorified flying cameras that have been around longer than some TikTok influencers have been alive. Meanwhile, a friend of mine has been building custom quadcopters for nearly two decades without a single newsworthy apocalypse resulting from it. But sure, let’s all clutch our pearls over something we’ve lived with peacefully for years, because apparently, critical thinking is optional these days.
The worst part? This drone outrage is nothing but a cheap distraction. While the masses are busy hyperventilating over the "threat" of flying gadgets, actual threats to democracy and justice are barreling forward unchecked. Luigi Mangione’s case—an explosive reflection of systemic neglect and institutional abuse—barely registers on the public radar. And Trump, the felonious rapist insurrectionist, and Elon, the tax-dodging manchild playing geopolitical chess with government subsidies, are tearing apart democratic norms like it’s their God-given right. Yet here we are, hand-wringing over drones, because apparently, a shiny distraction is all it takes to steer the public away from the real threats. Wake up. The manipulation is blatant, and your outrage is being weaponized against you while these bastards continue their games unchecked.
Father and son of Ulu Tiram attacker jailed 30 years for terrorism charges; mother sentenced four years, daughters acquitted. #ulutiram
The government won on most of the charges against the anti-ICE protesters, including terror counts and conspiracy to moving a box of antifa
Pakistan's Police has registered an FIR against Mahrang Baloch, chief organiser of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), along with 150 other
When Does Murder Amount To Terrorism?
Rico Krieger, 30, was convicted of six crimes, including terrorism, in a closed trial in June.
A court in Belarus has sentenced a German medic to death after he was found guilty of charges related to terrorism and mercenary activity, rights activists have said. Rico Krieger, 30, was convicted of six crimes in a closed trial in June, Viasna, one of Belarus' top activist organisations, said in a statement. The group said he now faced execution by firing squad. What prompted the charges remains unclear, and the country's state news agency carried no further details about the allegations in its report. Belarus is the last country in Europe where the death penalty is still carried out. It says it reserves the sentence for serious crimes, including treason. Viasna said that Mr Krieger's alleged crimes included mercenary work, espionage, terrorism, creating an extremist group, illegal operations with firearms and explosives. It said it marked the first time someone had been tried in Belarus for mercenary activity. The group, based in the Belarusian capital Minsk, said that Mr Krieger, who was working as a medic for the German Red Cross, had been in custody since November 2023. Parts of the trial were carried out behind closed doors and Viasna added that it was unsure whether Mr Krieger has appealed against the verdict, or whether it has gone into effect.
continue reading
