I saw an ask you answered on my dash about authors who should stop commenting about their work, and I was wondering what Donna Tartt's comment was? I've just gotten into her stuff, like I just read The Little Friend and read The Secret History right before that, so I'm curious as to what it was. Sorry if you've answered this before, I tried seeing if you tagged her in anything but nothing came up.
oh, this was mostly not a big deal after I thought about it, but she said something like “I knew I couldn’t make the protagonist a girl, because then everybody would immediately assume she just went along with it because she was in love with Henry,” and it’s just like 1) wow as if I didn’t want Camilla’s POV badly enough 2) uuuuuuh I got news for you about the vast majority of immediate interpretation of Richard Papen by people not decieved by heteronormativity, Tartt. But I don’t really mind that now, because the way it was phrased doesn’t necessarily mean she doesn’t think Richard’s in love with Henry, it just means she didn’t want it to be immediately obvious. I think there was some other, really weird/vague/”rather more disinclined that way than not”-esque language she threw around about Richard’s sexuality as well, but fortunately I’ve never seen that, so I can pretend it doesn’t exist/remain unbothered by it.
Also, I’m laughing because I got this ask the weekend after I decided to listen to the audio book of The Secret History, to see if I could guess at her intent behind some of the ambigious stuff by the way she pronounced or emphasized things (maybe I’m getting better at disregarding author’s alleged intent if it’s not what I want? I hope so.) If you’re curious, this didn’t really yield any definitive results about anything substantial (although her Bunny impression and her George LaForge French accent are something to cherish.)