To do nothing is not evil, no, but to avoid doing anything only so that you can do no evil is in itself evil.
I do not ask that you post this, only that you understand what it is I am trying to say.
it's only bad compared to other frameworks which actively incite you to do good. it's better than a framework which actively incites evil. the end result of it is doing nothing, which is neutral. what part do you disagree with? that a framework consistently causing a person to do nothing remains neutral? that a framework intended to be good and which fails to do so should still be compared to all other potential frameworks? is it because you think to have a framework based so much around fear and guilt will inevitably cause the person holding it pain and thus be bad with nothing to balance it out? (<- I feel like this one depends on how you put the idea into practice and is not inherent to it, despite being the overwhelming most common form of it. then again the language of 'x thing is bad' could be interpreted to mean only the most common or well known form of it. if you squint)














