#this is digusting

[saintsir4n]

SO this is just a joke to you guys? Just a meme? It’s racist and disgusting as fuck. They’re comparing Cynthia to biological men. They’re making caricatures out of her for simply defending a friend. I’ve tried reporting this on TikTok doesn’t but apparently misognoir doesn’t result in a violation or ban.

[tadfools]

There's a rage inside of me that I didn't know was humanly possible

[occasionalmemes]

BOYCOTT NETFLIX!!!

IF YOU DO NOT BOYCOTT NETFLIX THEN YOU ARE SUPPORTING PEDOPHILIA.  I will say that again.  If you do not boycott Netflix then you are supporting PEDOPHILIA.  People thought I was crazy for boycotting them when they started exhibiting obvious anti-Christian content,  but now it’s gone beyond that.  Netflix is defending a new show called ‘Cuties’.  It’s supposed to be some kind of “teen coming of age story” but it’s basically catering to pedophilia. The show has a scene where 11-year olds are dressed highly provocatively,  dancing like strippers. An 11-year old bares her breasts,  okay?  Naked children is not okay.  This is disgusting!  You need to stop giving Netflix your money,  because they are going to go on to damage young children.  Even hardened criminals in jail don’t allow that,  pedophiles do not have it good in jail,  so why should we allow Netflix to get away with it?  Netflix is wicked, evil, and has been going downhill for years now. Boycott Netflix,  cut off your subscription right now,  or you are helping to support the disgusting sexualization of little girls who should be protected by adults,  not used by them. This link provides a video of this pedophilia here to provide proof for anyone who wants to claim it’s an innocent show.  It is not innocent,  it is disgusting and wrong. These are 11-year old girls. These are children. And they are not being protected the way they should be.

[yondus-wife]

PSA

⭐️If you think shit like this is ok, get off of my blog⭐️

I’m having fun blocking all the disgusting fucks supporting this post, you aren’t welcome on my blog if you shame people for harmless things they cannot change, being rude to cishets is no better than being biased against anyone in the LGBT community. This blog is and will ALWAY be safe for LGBT people AND allies. Please don’t let horrible people like that represent us as a whole.

As a bi woman, I have spent my ENTIRE life being terrified of bigotry from BOTH sides. I’ve been shamed by my family for liking women in the past more times than I can count (I come from a conservative Christian family in Alabama, I’ve had my fair share of homophobic encounters, trust me.) and on the other hand, I’ve been shamed for being “too straight” for the LGBT community due to me being bi. I didn’t spend my life trying to hide who I am for so long to see people tear others down for their sexuality on what’s SUPPOSED to be a safe space for everyone.

It’s 2019 people. Stop shaming people for their sexuality, whether they be gay, straight, or anywhere in between (ace folks, I see you too, you are welcome here.) it’s downright disgusting and fighting fire with fire will only cause more of a problem in the end. [this of course excludes those who think “p*dosexuality” is a thing, please seek therapy if you defend that shit]

-Sav

[behind-the-hood]

The next time someone asks me to watch their pets for a month then has their power cut off day two of that, I'm sending them to a kennel. This is awful, the animals are melting, the house stinks, flies are everywhere, I'm drenched in sweat, I'm being bitten by fleas, it's legit 84 degrees and it's not even 9:30 in the morning.

Never again.

[androgynousbirdtale]

In case you're wondering and haven't researched it for yourself, here is why Dems won't vote for the CR the GOP tried to push through in regards to this shut down.

The whole point is to avoid doing more harm... right? 🙄😒

Here are the specific sections of H.R. 5371 (Engrossed House version) that carry the biggest impact on the social safety net, with citations to the bill text:

---

🧾 Section 115 — “Rescissions or Cancellations of Discretionary Budget Authority”

This section gives agencies the green light to continue prior rescissions (cancellations of funds) by reducing the rate of operations rather than restoring full funding levels.

👉 Impact: This effectively locks in prior funding cuts to programs unless Congress acts to reverse them — a stealth way of keeping budgets for low-income programs permanently lower.

---

🍞 Section 116 — “Domestic Food Programs—Food and Nutrition Service—WIC”

This section authorizes spending “at the rate for operations necessary to maintain participation,” rather than a full appropriation.

👉 Impact: That language sounds neutral, but it means no expansion or adjustment for inflation, leaving programs like WIC frozen in place despite higher food costs and population growth.

---

💸 Section 115(b)(1)–(2) (embedded in same section)

This provision says rescissions will continue at the lesser of the previously specified amount or the actual available balances.

👉 Impact: If there’s leftover or unobligated money for programs like SNAP or TANF, it can be automatically clawed back, instead of being redirected to meet increased need.

---

🏘 Section 155 — HUD Rental Assistance Funding Transfers

This section allows HUD to repurpose unobligated prior-year balances to prevent terminations of rental assistance.

👉 Impact: While it sounds like an emergency protection, it’s actually a sign that new appropriations are inadequate — HUD is told to rob old funds to patch gaps, a hallmark of underfunding.

---

🧮 Budget Control Framework

Throughout the bill, repeated language references continuing prior rescissions and treating certain funds as “emergency designations” without restoring them to full levels.

👉 Impact: This prevents flexibility in responding to crises like rising food insecurity or healthcare costs, cementing austerity levels that disproportionately hit low-income households.

---

🧩 What’s not in the bill (and that’s the problem)

You’ll notice H.R. 5371 extends programs (like telehealth or Medicare billing) but omits renewals or expansions for core safety net items — SNAP, Medicaid, TANF, and housing vouchers get only continuation language or rescission carryovers, not new authorizations or cost-of-living adjustments. That’s a silent but major form of gutting.

---

⚠️ Summary: Key Anti–Safety Net Mechanisms

Mechanism Section(s) What It Does

Prevents WIC or SNAP expansion Sec. 116 Freezes benefits at current levels

Allows clawback of unspent balances Sec. 115(b) Drains leftover social program funds

HUD reallocation from prior funds Sec. 155 Forces housing aid to rely on leftovers

Omits reauthorization of major aid programs — Quietly sunsets supports without direct repeal

Rescinds and freezes prior funding cuts Sec. 115, Keeps anti-poverty program cuts in place

Read it for yourself

[rbwggs]

somebody explain to me how it's possible that you download 1080p inkigayo videos but when you gif it it turns into 180p I suddenly understand why people in kpop mostly gif the ending fairies and only seldom the performance

[aintmyjewelry]

the Milwaukee Police Department has released a video only showing looting, damage, and vandalism that has came out of these protests and im no political expert but im like pretty fucking sure this is propaganda