“People Died Because Fauci Lied”: Attorney Tom Renz Testifies to the Ohio State Senate
• “They told us we have to social distance because it’ll keep us safe. Several years later, we found out that it wasn’t based on science. It was arbitrary.”
• “They told us that ivermectin is horse paste. It is? It’s been used globally for years. It saved billions of lives. It’s one of the safest things out there.”
• “Budesonide, as the good doctor testified, saved countless lives.”
• “‘Trust the science,’ said Anthony Fauci. Remember masks? One mask, two masks, four masks. Maybe you put pantyhose over your head to keep the mask safe. Do you all remember that? This wasn’t science. This was corruption.”
As such, Attorney Tom Renz is advocating for Ohio House Bill 73, the “Dave and Angie Patient and Health Provider Protection Act,” which allows healthcare providers to prescribe off-label medications, like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and protects their right to express independent medical opinions.
It also ensures patients are not denied basic care if they refuse specific treatments, such as remdesivir and ventilators. 🤔
Attorney Thomas Renz: "When you go to the hospital, you get tested. They get paid more. When you get admitted for COVID, they get paid more. When they put you on remdesivir, they get paid more. When you get ventilated, they get paid more. When you die, they get paid more. This is perverse." "We Have Incentivized the Murder of Patients Rather Than Incentivize Treatment"
President Donald Trump’s promotion of an unproven connection between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and autism has drawn widespread reb
Jack Winstanley and Payton Armstrong at MMFA:
President Donald Trump’s promotion of an unproven connection between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and autism has drawn widespread rebuke from world health officials and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, even as right-wing influencers cheered the news, declaring that “what was once dismissed as ‘conspiracy’ is now official policy discussion” in the Trump White House.
Right-wing media personalities and “Make America Healthy Again” acolytes have bolstered the HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.-created movement to exploit post-pandemic mistrust of public health infrastructure and pharmaceutical companies. Now, they are celebrating the president’s announcement as “incredibly bold” and the “most decisive action that could be taken.” Others highlighted Trump’s comments about vaccines, with some declaring that “Tylenol is not what’s driving this epidemic” and claiming that vaccines are “the primary driver.”
Trump announced the FDA will notify doctors that the use of Tylenol during pregnancy is linked to autism, leading OB-GYNs to denounce the policy as “not backed by the full body of scientific evidence”
On September 22, Trump pushed an unproven causal connection between autism and the use of Tylenol (also known as acetaminophen or paracetamol) during pregnancy. In a press conference, Trump thanked Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who has a long history of promoting discredited theories about vaccines causing autism — for bringing the subject to the “forefront of American politics, along with me,” adding, “We understood a lot more than a lot of people who studied it.” [CNN, 9/22/25; The Guardian, 9/24/25]
World health officials have rejected Trump’s claim that acetaminophen use during pregnancy causes autism. The European Medicines Agency told NBC that “a large amount of data from pregnant women who used paracetamol during pregnancy indicates no risk of malformations on the developing fetus or on newborns.” Australian health officials also rejected the claims, saying they are “a misrepresentation of the science.” [NBC News, 9/23/25]
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists — a group that represents more than 60,000 doctors — rebuked Trump’s announcement and called it “irresponsible” and “not backed by the full body of scientific evidence.” The group’s president, Dr. Steven Fleischman, said in a statement: “Today’s announcement by HHS is not backed by the full body of scientific evidence and dangerously simplifies the many and complex causes of neurologic challenges in children,” adding, “it is highly unsettling that our federal health agencies are willing to make an announcement that will affect the health and well-being of millions of people without the backing of reliable data.” [PBS, 9/22/25; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, accessed 9/24/25]
Discussing vaccines during the press conference, Trump also said, “Don’t let them pump your baby up with the largest pile of stuff you've ever seen in your life.” However, studies have shown no causal link between vaccines and autism, and “over the last 50 years, it is estimated that essential vaccines have saved at least 154 million lives,” according to UNICEF USA president and CEO Michael J. Nyenhuis. [Reuters, 9/23/23; NPR, 9/23/25]
Right-wig media and MAHA influencers give applause to Donald Trump’s endorsement of debunked anti-vax pseudoscience.
Data, transparency, and surveillance. That is what has been missing from the greatest experiment on humans of all time throughout this pandemic. Now, military medical whistleblowers have come forward with what they claim is perhaps the most accurate and revealing data set on vaccine safety one could...
Horowitz: Whistleblowers share DOD medical data that blows vaccine safety debate wide open
DANIEL HOROWITZ JANUARY 26, 2022
“Data, transparency, and surveillance. That is what has been missing from the greatest experiment on humans of all time throughout this pandemic. Now, military medical whistleblowers have come forward with what they claim is perhaps the most accurate and revealing data set on vaccine safety one could possibly find.
The pro-pharma politicians and media claim the CDC’s pharmacosurveillance tool “VAERS” is not good enough to trigger investigations into the shots because anyone can supposedly submit a vaccine adverse event entry. Thus, all the concerning safety signals from VAERS are being ignored, even though that system was put in place as a consolation to the public for absolving vaccine manufacturers of liability. Well, now some military whistleblowers are coming forward to present data that, if verified, would signal extremely disturbing safety concerns about the vaccine that make the VAERS data look like child’s play.
On Monday, during Sen. Ron Johnson’s five-hour hearing on a “COVID-19: Second Opinion,” Ohio attorney Thomas Renz, who has been representing clients suing the vaccine mandates, presented DOD medical billing data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) that paints a shockingly disturbing picture of the health of our service members in 2021.
According to the military, DMED is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s (AFHSB) “web-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS).” In other words, it contains every ICD medical billing code for any medical diagnosis in the military submitted for medical insurance billing during any given period of time. Three military doctors have presented queried data to Renz that shows a shocking and sudden spike in nearly every ICD code for common vaccine injuries in 2021.
In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. As Renz explained to me in an interview with TheBlaze, these doctors queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average. These codes were generally for ailments and injuries that medical literature has established as being potential adverse effects of the vaccines.
Renz told me the numbers tended to be remarkably similar in all those preceding years, including in 2020, which was the first year of the pandemic but before the vaccines were distributed. But then in 2021, the numbers skyrocketed, and the 2021 data doesn’t even include the months of November and December. For example, some public health officials speculate that COVID itself places women at higher risk for miscarriages. But the number of miscarriage codes recorded in 2020 was actually slightly below the five-year average (1,477). However, they were not drastically below the average on any one category in a way that one can suggest it reflects lockdown-related decreases in doctor’s visits, which somehow led to an increase in 2021 diagnoses.
The database has all the ICD codes for both military hospital visits and ambulatory visits. The data presented by Renz so far is all from the query of ambulatory diagnosis data.
Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!
Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:
myocardial infarction –269% increase
Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
female infertility – 471% increase
pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase
All these numbers are among the ambulatory visits because those are where the vast number of diagnoses in the military occur. However, Renz did say the increases were indicated in the hospitalized patients as well. I have seen one of the sworn declarations from one of the military doctors, and it states as follows, “It is my professional opinion that the major increases incidences of the above discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.'"
According to Renz, it was the actual clinical experience of the three named doctors and several unnamed doctors that led them to investigate DMED, and their discoveries reflected their experience treating patients with ailments extremely unusual to healthy, young soldiers since the rollout of the vaccines.
I have spoken to one of the whistleblowers who attests to being gravely concerned with seeing young soldiers with sudden metastatic cancers, auto-immune diseases, and heart and circulatory disorders that have caused many soldiers to drop out of various training programs. “These doctors were motivated to explore DMED data due to the numbers of case increases they were seeing empirically,” said the whistleblower, who served in the military for many years. “Some physicians throughout the force (all branches) have been intimidated by commands not to perform the full spectrum of testing and adhere to the regulations, which implicitly direct full workups for EUA vaccination adverse reactions. It will require other military physicians to step forward and share experiences to fully ascertain the enormity of these allegations and engender an investigation to the fullest extent.”
Renz claims he has a video with two witnesses showing the entire process of downloading this data from the database and is prepared to present it in court. He also told me that this is just “the tip of the iceberg,” as the codes have increased exponentially in numerous other diagnosis categories. Renz said his spreadsheet, which includes over 100 medical diagnosis categories, was shared with Senator Johnson and his staff before the Monday hearing.
It’s important to note that these numbers do not represent the number of individual people diagnosed with various ailments, but number of diagnoses codes used in totality at a given time. For example, someone who has a stroke is obviously going to rack up numerous neurological ICD codes over the course of a year with multiple ambulatory and hospital visits. However, the apples-to-apples comparison from the previous five years clearly shows an unmistakable spike in ailments.
If these numbers are verified in the upcoming court cases, then absent some massive military insurance fraud or bizarre glitch in the system, it potentially paints a shocking picture of vaccine safety concerns that would indicate that not only were the VAERS safety signals something that should immediately have been followed up on, but they are plagued by woeful underreporting. The military is a defined, finite, and closely controlled and monitored population. They are also overwhelmingly young and healthy. If allegations of neurological, cardio, and cancer concerns surrounding the vaccines are indeed true, the military would be the most revealing place to discover it, and their data is the most reliable and undisputable.
DMED is quite literally an epidemiological surveillance program designed for the express purpose of detecting surges in illness and injury to make sure the military is combat-ready. It’s about national security even more than public health. Why would the military not have blown the whistle and warned the CDC right away about this data? On the military health system website, the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD) is described as “the central epidemiologic resource for the U.S. Armed Forces, conducting medical surveillance to protect those who serve our nation in uniform and allies who are critical to our national security interests.”
How could the blaring and glaring surveillance signals of a lifetime be ignored by the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and how was this not conveyed to the general public? The question is why the military public health analysts have not been communicating with military doctors about the shocking spikes in diagnoses this year and why they have not put out any analysis explaining it.
For his part, Sen. Ron Johnson said at the Monday hearing that he put DOD on notice that it better not delete any of the data. “The Department of Defense, the Biden administration is on notice they must preserve these records and this must be investigated,” said Johnson. Renz testified at the hearing that some of the myocarditis data was slid backwards since the doctors originally downloaded it last year.
Even if somehow these earth-shattering increases have nothing to do with the vaccines, isn’t it important that our government investigate what appears to be a catastrophic decline in the health of our active-duty fighting force? After all, the DMED data was designed for this very purpose. “A person can do a research paper just on this data alone,” said one of the whistleblowers I spoke to. “It was designed for this very purpose. The amount of data points you could query is nearly unlimited.”
The bottom line according to Renz is that the onus of proof is on the government, not on the military personnel and citizens being forced to take the shots. If the manufacturers are exempt from liability for government coercion to use their product, and the only pharmacological safety data we have is completely ignored, then where is the recourse of the people to redress safety concerns? In the opinion of the Ohio attorney, if the shots are safe and effective, then the Pentagon should have no problem explaining the source of these gargantuan increases in instances of numerous illnesses. Transparency is the most potent cure of a pandemic of secrecy.”
Multiple far-right and MAHA media personalities have been critical of President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new deal with Pfizer regard
Alex Kaplan at MMFA:
Multiple far-right and MAHA media personalities have been critical of President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new deal with Pfizer regarding prescription drugs.
These figures, some of whom have explicitly supported Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, called the deal a “huge betrayal” that “crossed a red line” and said the deal was “a bomb going off with the MAHA-MAGA alliance” and meant the movement “is completely destroyed.”
Trump announced deal with Pfizer for Medicaid drugs
Trump and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced at a news conference on September 30 that the company “agreed to lower the prices it charges to state Medicaid programs for many of the drugs the company currently sells,” and “would also introduce new drugs in the United States at prices comparable to what it asks European countries to pay.” As part of the deal, The New York Times reported that “officials also announced they will create a new website, TrumpRx, where Americans will be able to use their own money to buy drugs directly from manufacturers, while sidestepping health insurance.” [The New York Times, 9/30/25]
Some MAHA figures previously praised Trump and Kennedy’s September 22 announcement promoting an unproven connection between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and autism. They called Trump and Kennedy’s unproven claim “incredibly bold” and the “most decisive action that could be taken.” [Media Matters, 9/26/25]
Sectors of the far-right media, especially the MAHA-aligned crowd, are not too happy with Donald Trump’s deal with Pfizer to form TrumpRx.
SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING EVIDENTIARY FINDINGS RELATED TO THE OFFICIAL RENZ LAW COVID-19 INVESTIGATION
First and foremost, herein is notice regarding critical evidence related to COVID-19, potential governmental corruption, and the safety of our military and citizens. We would like to thank Make Americans Free Again for their assistance in ensuring this document is provided to every congressperson, governor, state attorney general, and as many other elected officials as possible throughout the nation. By putting this document in the hands of every previously mentioned elected official we are demanding they look at the facts and take a stand. We need accountability and redress of grievance NOW!This document includes a substantial amount of evidence. While we believe it should be analyzed in its entirety, we have included overview documents that provide bullet-point information on critical items for easy reference (see the Table of Contents). Second, this document helps arm ‘We The People’ with the ability to argue facts at school board meetings, town councils and any forum are giving the ability to speak at. Take this document, print it out, make copies and distribute it to as many people as you can. We will put EVERY elected official and person involved in Covid-19 on notice!
What is the role of a doctor now that healthcare is not about health?
Have we killed the medical profession? What is the role of a doctor now that healthcare is not about health?
by Tom Renz, April 15th, 2022
“The COVID fraud continues, and we see massive number of doctors leaving practice, suffering from mental health crises, and even committing suicide (Here is an article blaming it on COVID). Many reasons are given for this, but I think the entire issue begs the question, what is the role of a doctor?
Traditionally, healthcare providers were independent businesspeople that acted more like tradesmen than employees of big businesses. Over the course of the twentieth century providers retained their position as independent tradesmen but stood out amongst the trades for the extensive levels of training required to become licensed in their trade. The role of a doctor, throughout this same period, was to use the extensive body on knowledge and critical thinking ability developed through years of study to find the best way to meet the healthcare needs of an individual patient. However, at the same time the professional development requirements were growing for doctors, so to was the business of making money off of their skills.
In the early twentieth century the idea of health insurance formalized. Early on, insurance was nothing more than people pooling money in case any of them were faced with a catastrophic medical crisis that they could not pay for out-of-pocket. Doctors’ fees were reasonable enough that the default mechanism for payment was out-of-pocket and it was rare that more was needed. Hospitals were also generally viewed as useful for catastrophic issues but not necessary for most health issues.
Over time all of this changed. Hospitals realized first that if a person is dealing with a catastrophic health issues the normal rules of supply and demand do not apply; if you are dying you really do not care what it costs to get well. As hospitals began to leverage this knowledge, costs went up for catastrophic insurance coverage and so too did the cost to be insured. Hospitals began to look at medicine as a business which was and is the core of the healthcare catastrophe we currently face.
Independent doctor, who’s primary interest was preserving the life and health of his or her patient had to recognize that billing the patient for more than they can pay was futile. The same doctor would have also realized that if the patient is not cared for and kept alive there would be no income at all (and some even cared about doing the right thing because it was the right thing to do). As medicine became big business, the insurance companies or government (the payers) relationship with the hospitals became an incredibly complex game of financial gamesmanship between the doctors and patients. The result was the doctors lost, the patients lost, and science was politicized.
For years, the business of medicine has been pushing various mechanisms to keep consumers healthy. The usefulness of many of these is questionable at best but the marketing is incredibly successful. We constantly see advertisements for drugs or “studies” that demonstrate the necessity of various procedures, but the reality is that the science does not always seem to support the advertised benefits. There are a number of “outsider” scientists that are credible and have discussed the prevalence of this issue, but the one inarguable fact is that benefits are frequently advertised based on questionable studies or using misleading data. No greater example of this exists than the COVID jabs and their advertised efficacy which was both false and misleading and entirely about money and power.
At some point it became clear to the money people in medicine that they needed to be able to consolidate control over the doctors. Afterall, independent doctors looking out for the best interests of their patients would do their own research and make recommendations based on what was best for the patient overall rather than based only on profit. The consolidation of control over doctors also meshed with the goals of certain global “leaders” (also read tyrant wannabe’s) that recognized that if you control peoples’ health you control the people. This lead to the consolidation of healthcare, culminating in America with the passage of Obamacare.
Obamacare did two things well, it eliminated independent doctors by creating too much bureaucracy for them to practice on their own, and it implemented electronic medical records (EMRs) to better ensure control and track data on everyone. The bureaucracy is complicated though understanding its impact is not. What is less apparent is the importance of the EMR provisions.
EMRs are now mandatory and that means the government now has access to all of our private health information either directly or indirectly. This data is supposedly protected but is shared through a number of corporations, technical platforms, and other places. While none of these groups can legally acknowledge what they know about an individual’s health, the reality is that your health information is shared in more places than you will ever know. Further, the EMR systems do not only collect data, but they are also frequently integrated with other software that provides treatment options based on diagnoses determined by the software and based on the symptoms entered by the provider.
This is where malpractice comes in to play. In many states malpractice is roughly defined as deviation from what a similar professional would do in a similar situation. If all of the physicians in an area are controlled by the same hospital system and the hospital system’s software provide generalized diagnoses and treatment options, then you would rarely be guilty of malpractice if you just follow what the computer says. If you deviate, however, the hospital administration would know and you would be at risk of malpractice which means you may also lose your job. Seems like a solid way to control physicians.
If this seems bad, it is. Remember, the computer system is programmed by people. The people programming the system are basing diagnoses and recommendations for treatment on statistical probabilities (and how much money they make) but people are not identical. If you happen to be a statistical outlier and your doctor knows it then the doctor is faced with risking malpractice and losing their jobs or treating you according to their conscience.
The picture I am laying out here is neither perfect nor complete. There are variations in different healthcare systems and different states and I am greatly oversimplifying some of the issues. That said, the basic premise does hold true and can be seen very clearly in the issues around COVID. When a doctor types in the symptoms of COVID the systems will invariably push the COVID diagnosis (remember the hospitals that are paying for the computer systems get more money for each COVID case and the systems are programmed with due consideration to money). They will then push treatments that maximize profit for the hospital even though they don’t work and frequently kill rather than heal because, again there are high reimbursement rates from our government thanks to Fauci’s protocols. If doctors do anything different the administration is made aware immediately and the doctors are fired because using alternative treatments that showed promise would undermine the liability shield the hospitals have against malpractice (there is more to this but that’s for another article).
The same thing is happening with the jabs. If a person comes in with symptoms of jab side effects the EMRs have been programmed to diagnose ANYTHING but a jab as the cause. Thus, these side effects are not recorded and are really only recognized through data-mining operations. Meanwhile, the hospital keeps making money and the doctors have to keep watching people die.
This leads back to the original question, what is the role of a doctor? At this point the doctor’s job is simply to input data into a computer system and then follow the directions. They are not to question the computer’s authority and certainly are not allowed to practice the science of medicine. When you think about all this I guess it is not a surprise so many doctors are having mental health crises or leaving the profession… in fact, it almost makes it seem like spending all that time and money on medical school is a waste.”
