Nothing truly real is forgotten eternally, because everything real comes from eternity and goes to eternity.
Paul Tillich, The Eternal Now

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from South Korea
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
Nothing truly real is forgotten eternally, because everything real comes from eternity and goes to eternity.
Paul Tillich, The Eternal Now
The Philosophy of Agape
Agape (pronounced ah-gah-pay) is an ancient Greek word often translated as “unconditional love” or selfless, divine love. In philosophical, theological, and ethical contexts, agape refers to a kind of love that is:
Unmotivated by desire or reciprocity,
Given freely, and
Oriented toward the good of the other—even at personal cost.
Unlike eros (romantic/desirous love) or philia (friendship), agape is a moral and ontological stance—a commitment to value others for their intrinsic worth.
Philosophical Origins
Plato laid the groundwork by discussing love as a longing for the Good, though agape as such isn’t central to his dialogues.
The New Testament (especially in the writings of Paul and John) develops agape as the highest form of love—one that God shows to humanity, and which humans are called to show each other.
Augustine and later Aquinas connected agape with caritas (charity), seeing it as the core of Christian virtue ethics.
Agape in Moral Philosophy
Agape has been explored as a moral ideal that transcends rules or consequences:
Immanuel Kant emphasized duty and respect for persons; agape aligns with treating people as ends in themselves.
Utilitarians like Peter Singer reference agape-like principles in advocating impartial concern for all.
Existentialists like Kierkegaard viewed agape as a divine calling—a radical love of neighbor that breaks social or emotional categories.
Agape serves as a foundation for altruism, hospitality, and forgiveness, often in tension with self-interest or tribal loyalty.
Agape and Ontology
Some modern thinkers argue that agape is not just ethical, but ontological:
Paul Tillich and Simone Weil saw agape as grounded in being itself—as a force that restores wholeness.
In process philosophy, agape is considered a cosmic principle—love as the glue of relational reality.
Phenomenology interprets agape as an encounter with the Other that resists objectification.
Agape in the Modern World
Agape has been invoked in various social movements:
Martin Luther King Jr. called agape “understanding, creative, redemptive goodwill for all men.”
In liberation theology, agape grounds the commitment to justice for the poor and oppressed.
In secular ethics, agape reappears as radical empathy or universal compassion.
Agape challenges systems based on competition, exclusion, and instrumental rationality, offering a vision of love as an active, transformative principle.
In Summary:
Agape is unconditional, self-giving love rooted in the intrinsic worth of others. As a philosophy, it spans ethics, theology, ontology, and politics—representing a call to value others beyond reciprocity, desire, or identity. In a world increasingly governed by transactional logic, agape offers an alternative ethic of radical openness, humility, and care.
"The aim of psychic development is to be able to tolerate insecurity..." Erich Fromm
Usually when I come to this coffeehouse I see at least one person reading the Bible. This morning I see people reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche, The Stranger by Albert Camus, and The Courage to Be by Paul Tillich (!). The coffeehouse existentialists give me hope for humanity.
Paul Tillich, The Eternal Now
Tillich, Systematic Theology, “Art and Ultimate Reality”
Belief: Something taken to be true without or regardless of evidence.
Thought this up and drew it. Often I hear “You have to respect everyone’s beliefs,” which I consider fairly dangerous - I mean, racism is a belief, after all.