Tim Robey Talks Chemistry in “Romeo and Juliet, Review”
3.78 stars for Tim Robey’s 584‑word review of “Romeo and Juliet” on Daily Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/10370355/Romeo-and-Juliet-review.html
Tim Robey has moments of greatness in “Romeo and Juliet, review,” but the audience will perhaps desire a better-looking and more substantial review.
Juliet, review opens with up a strange joke that has little relevance to the work as a whole, and certainly won’t capture the attention of the reader. It’s a classic throwaway line.
The visuals of Juliet, review are rather plain other than a glorious header image which will surely please many of Robey’s fans.
Once Robey moves past the attempts at humor, Juliet, review becomes a pleasant surprise. The critic makes clear statements about the flaws of the film, and offers several examples as evidence. Robey states that “revisionism’s fine,” however a few of his observations may comes across as a bit nit-picky. Many readers will certainly be pleased, or at least impressed, with the attention to detail.
Juliet, review is successful in conveying what is wrong with the mood of the film, however there is little analysis about the individual performances. Robey quickly glides over the supporting cast, and Paul Giamatti is left out completely.
Tim Robey proves to be a great chemistry mind in Juliet, review, but fails to offer any useful insight on the acting of the lead characters.
Buy Tickets: fandango.com/romeoandjuliet2013_164299
Original Post: e.xst.ma/tm/6TM8
More Reviews: e.xst.ma/t/m/771246245
Rotten Tomatoes: rottentomatoes.com/m/771246245
IMDB: imdb.com/title/1645131