tinyhouseplant replied to your post “wait hold on. is the new dirk gently good? I avoided it like the...”
Like I think it manages to capture that Douglas Adams vibe that's really hard to translate to screen whilst also having a really fun and compelling and intricate plot
Also written in a way that unapologetically takes a number of shots at "me, an intellectual" style detective shows (BBC Sherlock)
funny enough this is one of the things I did like about the short-lived, inconsistent bbc four series of dirk gently. (which was good on its own terms, iirc, but doesn’t hold a candle to douglas adams in any way.) it’s weird how this character from the 80s is (serendipitously, given his methods) completely accidentally a great vehicle for mocking sherlock
lightpossession replied to your post “wait hold on. is the new dirk gently good? I avoided it like the...”
i never read the books but personally i loved the series it was so fun and i liked every character so
I haven’t read it in a long while but I highly recommend at least the first book. (I haven’t read the second, and the third was never finished.) it’s like adams’s other series, hitchhiker’s guide, only...denser? the effect of the book is sort of like if one of the absurdist anecdotes about the universe from h2g2 was expanded to the length of a full novel, except it’s actually five or six of those anecdotes all layered on top of each other and intertwined. and it started life as a particularly good doctor who script. if the show is at all like the book I think you’d enjoy it.
tinyhouseplant replied to your post “wait hold on. is the new dirk gently good? I avoided it like the...”
Like I'd Hella recommend watching it and I'm here to discuss it with you from like a series perspective and like a production perspective because I have a lot to say about it
I’ll let you know if I watch it!