Is there a sexuality that’s just kind of... blurry? Like your attraction is there, but you can’t really define it?
Not sure if any of these fit the blurry thing, but there are certainly terms that deal with uncertainty or vagueness in some ways:
Com-: “To experience attraction, polar opposite of A- (asexual/aromantic/etc). An orientation label to use if you do not wish to narrow your orientation down any further than simply feeling attraction. Different from allo/zed in that Com- is a specific identity while allo/zed are blanket terms.”
Gray-/Gray-a-/Grey-/Grey-a-: "Being between a- and allo-; feeling attraction rarely, vaguely, or weakly.”
Merc-: “One who cannot pinpoint their sexuality, for it is ever changing.”
Migmattractional: “Not being able to distinguish between ANY kind of attraction/feeling them all at once to everyone you're attracted to. Semi-migmattractional is the same thing except the attraction felt is eventually partially/fully figured out or a type/types are consciously chosen.“
Moll- / Molli-: “An orientation that is weak or soft in its presence, often from ‘none’ to ‘about halfway’. From ‘molli’, latin for ‘soft’.”
Novi-: “Feeling complicated attraction or lack thereof in such a way that it is difficult or impossible to fit into one word or term.“
Pomo-: “An orientation where one denies or does not fit any labels for a particular kind of attraction. For example, someone who is pomosexual may or may not feel sexual attraction, but is not interested in specifying whether they feel it, and to whom. ‘Not straight’. A label for not wanting or needing a precise label.”
Pre-: “A placeholder term for when someone feels that they have not experienced attraction enough to know their orientation yet.“
Sans-: “When there’s no trend line in the attraction; basically, it’s a very fluid orientation. Like aroflux, but all orientations, not just aro scale. It means no orientation (sans means without).“
Volit-: “Feeling attraction, but not directed at anyone in particular.“
~ Tath
