Jun 3
seen from Russia
seen from India
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Morocco
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Singapore
seen from Ukraine
seen from Netherlands
seen from Colombia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from Singapore
seen from Nigeria
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Pakistan
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from Germany
bot-ched
Okay, so I'm the Growth Team product manager at my job - so my goal is getting more people to see the site. In this day and age, that means SEO: search engine optimization.
Even with the scales removed (sorry - confidential info!) it's clear things are going up. Well... until we hit a snag. See, Google doesn't like duplicate content, but Googlebot - the webcrawler that visits your site and reports back - is pretty dumb. It thinks example.com and example.com?session_id=123 are two different sites, even though a human could see this query parameter has nothing to do with the contents of the site. So... we gotta give Googlebot some rules.
Now, I've never bothered to do this for my own projects, but it's best practice to include a top-level robots.txt file so those non-human visitors go where they're supposed to. For example, we recently started disallowing query parameters to eliminate the duplicate page issue.
Uh... as it turns out, due to our site’s setup, one particular query parameter is exceptionally important, specifically for Googlebot. In fact, if the robot visits the page without that, it sees an empty shell. And our search traffic declines, week-over-week:
Luckily, the team figured it out and fixed it right away - in a single line of code! - and this past week had some of our highest-traffic days ever. But let this be a lesson: take extreme care when it comes to the bots!
tl;dr: duplicate content is bad, but no content is worse; use robots.txt, and give the bots a sitemap too; track it all in Google Analytics
project: this is my job, actually
Added a little more blue to the custom Spider-Man watch strap!
Added some color to my Stark Intern sketch from yesterday
Superior Spider-Man.
How OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) Can Benefit From Price Monitoring
Original Equipment Manufacturer is the producer of a vehicle’s original components. This means the parts manufactured by an OEM are identical to the initial parts and have the same quality and compatibility that came with the original product. Automobile owners also have the option of going with aftermarket parts, rebuilt, refurbished or even used parts. Whereas rebuilt or used parts are quite unreliable and hence, less trusted; this leads to a large number of customers going for the aftermarket parts. Aftermarket parts are the ones manufactured by vendors other than the original manufacturer, and are made to function and perform as well as the original. These are priced much lower and hence, pose as great
OEM Parts Monitoring competitors to OEM. Original manufacturers need to be constantly aware of the vendors offering similar products and their pricing. This is where ome to their rescue.
Our Price monitoring services combine latest software tools with data mining and personal insight to generate regular reports on price trends in the market. Our inputs help you make an accurate analysis and informed decisions to maintain your products at competitive rates. We provide data on a daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly basis, as per our client’s requirement.
Web Scraping is another service that is becoming indispensable for any competitive business. Web Scraping is the method of automatically mining data or collecting information from the internet and present it in a format that
is deciphered and easily understood by its consumer. These services help the businesses take informed decisions on their product features, pricing and business road map. These services collate data that is scattered all over the web and transform it into a structured, organised and interrelated information.
There are a few reasons as to how an OEM industry would benefit from Data Scraping
Access to customer preferences, buying habits and trends can empower the manufacturer to make significantly improved decisions.
Data on trends based on geographical regions help them to build various strategies on marketing for different regions.
The automobile industry is experiencing very advanced technologies, very advanced materials and very advanced structural elements that are changing perpetually. According to Chris Tobie, the collision business specialist at
American Honda, “Because of the rapid body technology changes, two model years of the same vehicle may appear similar but employ very different body structures.” Thus, it would be in the best interest of a competitor to stay abreast of the latest technologies and trends in the industry.
Due to fierce competition in automobile parts industry, the aftermarket manufacturers often come up with unique features trying to outperform the original equipment. For an OEM it becomes crucial to keep an eye out for such trends and keep their products up-to-date with the latest developments.
In design and manufacturing divisions, errors can be more expensive with each successive production stage. A recall on the model spirals the warranty spend on the manufacturer. Here OEM needs data related to the vehicle’s age, performance, and failure scenarios to reduce warranty spend.
In conclusion, Web Scraping and Price Comparisons & Monitoring services can provide the OEM industry with the diagnostic, analytical and precise information to maintain its quality and merit and also preserve its appeal with the customers.
Rendering Is a Decision, Not a Default: A Field Guide for AI Web Agents
Web access looks simple until an AI agent has to use it reliably. Give the agent a URL, retrieve the page, and pass the text to a model. That approach works for static articles, but it breaks when a site loads its content with JavaScript, hides information behind interaction, or presents a visual state that cannot be reconstructed from HTML alone.
The common reaction is to render every page in a full browser. That solves some failures, but it introduces slower responses, higher compute cost, more fragile sessions, and additional sources of nondeterminism. The better design is to treat rendering as a controlled escalation.
Define what success means before retrieval
An agent should know what it needs from the page. Is the goal to extract an article, collect product fields, confirm a chart, observe a logged-out state, or follow a client-side navigation flow? The required evidence determines the cheapest faithful access method.
For plain text and links, a normal HTTP fetch is often enough. For data created after JavaScript runs, rendering may be necessary. For a visual claim such as a layout error, selected filter, canvas chart, or modal state, a screenshot may be the actual evidence.
Without this definition, teams tend to equate a successful browser load with a successful task. A page can render beautifully while the extracted information remains incomplete or irrelevant.
Start with the inexpensive path
Fetch the page first when the URL is public and the task does not obviously require interaction. Record the requested URL, final URL, status code, content type, and response size. Extract the main text and inspect basic signals: title, headings, meaningful paragraph length, structured data, and expected terms.
A direct fetch has important operational advantages. It is faster, easier to cache, and simpler to reproduce. It also reduces the number of moving parts involved in a failure. If the fetched document already contains the needed evidence, browser rendering adds little value.
The decision should be based on completeness, not on whether the document contains script tags. Many modern sites ship JavaScript while still including useful server-rendered content.
Detect evidence of an application shell
Escalate when the initial response is clearly not the visible document. Common signals include a nearly empty root element, a loading placeholder with no substantive text, missing data that appears in the browser, or navigation that only exists after hydration.
Do not rely on one global character threshold. A login page may be legitimately short, while a documentation page should be much longer. Compare the response with expectations for the page type and the task.
Known site patterns can help, but they should remain hints rather than permanent rules. Websites change. A host that required rendering last month may add server-side rendering, while another may migrate in the opposite direction.
Render with a bounded contract
When escalation is justified, the renderer needs explicit limits. Set a navigation timeout, total elapsed-time budget, maximum redirect count, and a clear readiness condition. Waiting for every network connection to become idle can fail on pages with analytics, streaming, or background polling.
A better readiness condition is tied to evidence: a target element exists, a loading marker disappears, a result count becomes visible, or the main content reaches a reasonable size. Record the condition and whether it was satisfied.
A service such as AnyCrawler's browser-rendering workflow at https://anycrawler.com/crawler/page/render/ can provide the rendered page layer, but the agent still needs a policy for when to invoke it and how to judge the result. Tools provide capabilities; the pipeline provides discipline.
Avoid accidental interaction
Rendering does not automatically authorize clicking. An agent should separate passive page execution from actions that change state. Opening a public page is different from submitting a form, accepting permissions, adding an item to a cart, or sending a message.
Define an interaction allowlist for each task. Clicking a pagination control or expanding a public accordion may be appropriate. Logging in, uploading files, consenting to tracking, or triggering a purchase requires distinct authority. This boundary protects both the user and the site.
Capture the right output
Rendered HTML is still not the ideal model input. Extract the meaningful content after rendering and keep its structure: headings, paragraphs, lists, tables, link destinations, and useful labels. Preserve the final URL and retrieval time.
Take screenshots only when visual state matters. Screenshots are excellent for charts, canvas content, responsive layouts, visual regressions, and proof of what a user saw. They are inefficient substitutes for a text article and create extra storage and vision-processing cost.
When a screenshot is necessary, connect it to the same evidence record as the extracted text. Store viewport size, capture time, and relevant interaction state so reviewers know what the image represents.
Build fallbacks that end
A production agent needs a stopping rule. A reasonable page-level policy may allow one normal fetch, one rendered attempt after a justified escalation, and one retry for a transient infrastructure error. Repeated access denials, authentication walls, and persistent empty results should become explicit outcomes.
If one source fails, the system can return to discovery and choose another credible source. This is usually better than spending the entire task budget fighting a single host. Record why the source was abandoned so the same failure is not repeated silently.
Measure the escalation rate
Track how often fetches succeed, how often rendering is invoked, which signals caused escalation, and whether rendering actually added useful information. Measure latency, bytes, compute time, and accepted evidence per method.
A high render rate may indicate that the discovery stage favors application pages, that the static extractor is weak, or that the escalation thresholds are too aggressive. A high rate of rendered pages with no additional evidence is a strong signal that the default policy needs revision.
Make the decision explainable
Every result should answer three questions: Which method was used? Why was that method selected? Did it produce the required evidence? A compact decision record makes failures reproducible and costs understandable.
This matters when two runs disagree. The first may have used a cached fetch while the second rendered a changed client-side state. Without method provenance, the difference looks like model inconsistency instead of a retrieval difference.
A practical default policy
Start with discovery only when the source is unknown. For a known public URL, fetch first. Evaluate completeness against the task. Render only when observable evidence shows that the page requires it. Interact only within an authorized allowlist. Capture screenshots only for visual claims. Stop when the page budget is exhausted and preserve the reason.
Rendering remains an essential tool for web agents. It becomes far more reliable when it is a decision with evidence, limits, and metrics instead of an expensive reflex.
Implementation example: AnyCrawler's browser-rendering workflow
Use AnyCrawler's render page API to load JavaScript pages in a browser and return clean Markdown from client-rendered content.
How do search engines work? Learn the step-by-step technical process of how search engines crawl, render, index, and rank websites to delive
How Search Engines Crawl and Index Your Website for SEO Success
Understanding Search Engine Crawling
Crawling is the foundational process where search engine bots, often called spiders or crawlers, systematically browse the internet to discover content. These bots follow links from known pages to new ones, mapping the web structure to identify updates and new additions.
Web crawlers fetch text, images, and video content.
XML sitemaps act as a roadmap to help bots find your important pages faster.
The Indexing Process Explained
Once a page is crawled, the search engine must process and store the information in a massive database known as the index. This stage involves analyzing the content to determine its subject matter, quality, and relevance, ensuring it can be retrieved efficiently when a user performs a search.
Indexing organizes data so it can be served in search results.
Algorithms filter out duplicate or low-quality content during this phase.
Optimizing for Visibility
Technical SEO practices are essential to ensure your site is easily accessible to search engines. By managing your crawl budget and providing clear site architecture, you help search engines navigate and understand your content without unnecessary obstacles.
Use robots.txt to control which areas of your site crawlers should avoid.
Ensure your site structure is logical to improve discoverability.