I'm still so fuckin confused after re watching the WM40 behind the scenes doc [with other people who hadn't seen it yet] why did they have cody win the rumble if prior to the rumble and prior to any injuries they were 90% certain seth would fight punk and roman would fight the rock. If they had and were able to stick to both those championship matches what tf would cody have done at WM ?!?!
Triple H thought cody not winning hinders his momentum but him winning and not challenging for either championship belt when winning the rumble = championship match makes no sense !!! At that point either have punk beat him and challenge seth or you should have just had the rock enter the rumble and win. Please I really need someone who might understand this better than me to explain their original logic behind cody winning the rumble and not challenging roman or even seth.







