Reflections on Charlie Kirk's Celebration of Life: Free Speech Needs Gua...
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ireland
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from Yemen

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
Reflections on Charlie Kirk's Celebration of Life: Free Speech Needs Gua...
Some Jehovah's Witness things I'm processing...
Tumblr is giving a lot of you really warped and narrow minded view of love and romance. Those poems, quotes and visual media are someone's work. They're not meant to be taken literally, or as a guide.
In reality you'll experience relationships with people who will have their own flaws, experiences and limitations. No, they will not respond to your needs and situations the way you've been brought up to think. Oftentimes it won't go the way you expect. Sometimes there will be mistakes. And those so called imperfections are what give relationships that humane quality.
Romance in media and literature are for show. Your own experiencs and journey are what actually matter, and something you'll actually remember, instead of generic romance Tumblr quotes.
And honestly, people on here are starting to sound the same. Where's the individuality?
"Every cloud has a silver lining, but some people only see the storm"
The King of Ravenbow to the School Masters: Until we meet again.
⸻
[Out of earshot, later:]
Rafal: [in a low voice] That was a veiled threat if I ever heard one—
Rhian: [affectedly] Don't be daft! It was an invitation.
Midas: You're both nutcases. It was a form of basic human decency the two of you lack.
⸻
The Storian: All members of the king's audience were wrong.
⸻
Inspired by these:
I just realized there’s a fundamental difference in people I do and don’t feel comfortable around. It has to do with the way they interpret the world.
The ones I don’t feel comfortable around, are usually people older than me, but that is not what I take issue with; it’s their manner of speaking to me. These people will speak their views of world as if it’s final, the only correct way to think They will also attempt to force this view of the world on you, with the complete assurance that you will. If you try to correct them, they’ll respond with almost a threat in their voice if you don’t immediately comply and validate that you agree. Their values, the ‘old values’, are the only ones that are true, and they don’t wait to see if you think differently, they’ll state it as if it was a timeless fact and dare you to confront them on it. I will sometimes, carefully, try to point out inaccuracies or research that has proven it wrong - and they’ll fight me on it.
For instance, I’ve had an elderly person complain to me about the ‘today’s youth’ and ‘how they’re ruining everything’. The problem was that the children in the park were loud, and sometimes, they would see teenagers late at night in the park, and they assumed these teenagers were doing drugs (can’t confirm if this is true). The elderly person got upset, yelled, and insisted it would all be better if some physical violence was thrown at those children. I couldn’t listen to that kind of line without interfering, so I pointed out, hey, that would only make the children more likely to become mentally unhealthy, depressed, and learn that the violence is the only rule in life. I also pointed out that even if the teenagers in the park were doing drugs, they cannot be the source of the problem; after all, they’re not the ones who invented drugs, or circulated it here, or would be easily able to buy them; it was the older generations that created this problem, and gave them to the teenagers. The elderly person pretended not to hear any of it, and stuck to their original opinion, while now seeing me as the enemy. After all, if I didn’t conform to their worldview, I was the problem, one of those who need to ‘get some common sense’ and be ‘persuaded’. Because blaming kids and teenagers on problems created by the older generations, is the only way they can keep seeing themselves and their contribution to the world, in a positive light. The only way to keep control.
The other type of person is the one who doesn’t attempt to enforce their worldview on you, instead they try to see where you’re at. They’ll tell you what they think, add ‘at least that is how I see it’, and then ask you ‘What’s your view on this? What do you think?’
Sometimes we’ll find pretty soon that our views differ, and we’ll agree to disagree and talk about something else. Sometimes, we’ll display our information, how we know it, and offer arguments that lead us to believe what we do, sometimes we’ll have little anecdotes to tell. Sometimes we’ll find out some new information, be encouraged to research it, and come back to revisit the subject in order to decide on a new, more informed standpoint. Sometimes we’ll find out we’re completely on the same page, and then be glad to have found out. But we don’t assume. We don’t see each other and go ‘yes, this person I don’t yet know perfectly, must have the exact stance on every issue in the world, they must have this specific information and subscribe to the same ideas and thoughts’, because that is presumptive, rude, and creating impossible expectations.
I wonder if the first kind are people who shared their perception of the world with their entire generation, and then project that idea on the entire world, believing those who disagree can only be blind and stupid? And in that case, assuming someone would disagree, is the same as assumption they’re lacking in intellect? My generation has vastly different views on everything, I can find people my age who disagree with my every view, and people younger than me who agree with me. I can’t assume for anyone that they would adapt my views, but I also can’t assume them clueless, because we all form our view based on information we gather thru life, and different people will have different information and experiences at their disposal. So it’s necessary to not assume, to find out where people stand, and then meet them where they’re at.
If you lie down with dogs with fleas, you'll get fleas. Hence the company you keep will effect and influence you so be cautious about who you associate yourself with on a constant basis.
I'm not saying you can't hang out with that friend you care about so much and wish to see them better. But what I am saying is that of you involve yourself with them all the time in their actions, it will start to corrode you.
I would also like to add that if you are a friend with a unbeliever and you look at them as a project to get to Christ instead of a person who needs Christ, you need to take a step back and think real hard about that cuz that's gross.