Oct 17, 2025
seen from China
seen from Lithuania
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from China
seen from Qatar
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Qatar
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
I've been thinking about trying out the x32 ABI.
Not to be confused with x86-32 and x86-64, x32 is a Linux-specific ABI designed to combine the computational efficiency of x86-64 with the memory efficiency of x86-32.
x32 uses the x86-64 instruction set, allowing for more registers and faster instructions, while using 32-bit pointers and 32-bit integers, allowing for a smaller memory footprint.
Smaller memory footprint also means that the CPU cache is more effective and less memory bandwidth is required.
Various benchmarks I've seen 'round the 'net show that x32 provides up to 40% less memory consumption and 10% faster performance (especially for pointer-heavy applications like Java) compared to x86-64
However, x32 has a couple disadvantages:
Applications are limited to up to 3GiB of virtual memory space each, like x86-32.
Most applications that have assembly optimizations wont work, or at least those parts wouldn't be optimized, unless the developers specifically add x32 support.
It is quite esoteric, and therefore more prone to bugs, due to the lack of users for testing.
There's a chance it'll be removed in the kernel some time in the near future. (There were talks of removing it back in 2018, but it didn't go anywhere)
As far as I'm aware, only glibc has proper support for x32. Musl has preliminary experimental support for it, but I doubt it'll ever get finish due to the obscurity of it.
I scrapped and re-wrote my no-branches FizzBuzz program (did I post about that? I think I did.) to be closer to my vision:
No branches
No jumps
No calls (except to the function itself)
No mov instructions where the source is a location in memory
No indirection not of the form [rdi] + disp64
No mutating rdi
And check it out, it works!
If you want the explanation, I've exported my literate source code to HTML and screenshotted it below the cut. If you just want the source code, go here.
What's the oldest CPU you've used with Linux
80386
80486
Pentium
Pentium II / Celeron
Pentium III / Celeron
Pentium 4
Ryzen 1000-3000
MIPS
SPARC
HP PA-RISC
IBM POWER
ARM
SINCLAIR PC200 (aka Amstrad PC20) 1988
The Sinclair PC200, released under the Amstrad brand, marked a significant shift from earlier Sinclair products. Essentially, it was Amstrad’s effort to attract the same market the Sinclair QL once aimed for: serious users and small businesses operating on a limited budget.
Technically, the PC200 was a heavily stripped-down IBM-compatible PC, featuring an Intel 8086 processor, CGA graphics, 512KB of RAM (expandable to 640KB), and no hard drive. It shipped with MS-DOS 3.3 and the GEM desktop environment from Digital Research. Optionally, an Intel 8087 math co-processor could be installed.
Although the machine offered two expansion slots, the case design made internal upgrades awkward — the top cover had to be removed permanently to access the slots, severely restricting expandability.
In reality, there was nothing unique about the PC200. It was a rebranded version of the PC20, previously launched by Amstrad in the US. Even the monitors were rebadged: the S14-CM (color) and S12-MM (monochrome) were essentially variants of the PC1640 and Schneider MM12, respectively. The only peripherals specifically released for the PC200 were a basic black Amstrad mouse and the SPJ-1 analog joystick.
Given that its main competitors at the time were far more advanced machines like the Atari ST and Commodore Amiga, it's no surprise that the PC200 was a commercial flop. Today, the machine is extremely rare and mostly remembered as a curiosity in computing history.
what is your CPU arch
x86
x86-64/amd64 (bleh)
arm/armel/armhf
arm64/aarch64
ia64 (can I marry you)
ppc/ppc64 (the ones in the old macs)
ppc64el (the new ppc ones I think)
RISCV (oo ily)
SPARC (are you insane)
other (PLEASE SPECIFY I SWEAR TO GOD)
I have no idea / results
found more stuff diving through hexagreat and credited sites and tried making some sorta animation in mikoto but after exporting the bmp sequence it crashed. seeing the difference between 3d software then and now makes me really thankful that sorta software is much more accessible now. even blender 2.7 makes me feel that way especially as i found it mega confusing trying to use it to make mc animations as a kid. Also idek how to animate i rarely ever do