Independent Research Project - Early Childhood Art Education
My Interest
For my independent research project, I wanted to look into early childhood art education. In my introduction at our first class together, I mentioned that I teach art to 0-5 years old on the weekend. The program was through the city of Surrey and called “Art Explorer”; there was no specific qualification as to who can be an art instructor/teacher but I took it on as I enjoy doing arts and crafts and want to be a teacher. The program structure was open for me to determine the art projects the children would do. All I needed to do was keep the cost of materials low for each project. I would be lying if I didn’t say that during my first class, I felt unprepared as an instructor. There was no theory or approach and direct experience I had teaching early childhood art education. Therefore, hopefully, through my research of early childhood art education, I will learn more about the history and approaches I can do in future practice and also reflect on my prior experience of teaching art to 0-5.
History
Finding the history behind early childhood art education was harder than I assumed it would be. However, I found that there are three views/orientations/approaches that have influential to young childrens’ art education over the past 50 years: the child-centered (child as creator), subject-matter-centered (child as meaning maker), and society-centered (the child in a cultural context) (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000). There is also the holistic approach to early childhood art education which is tied into Reggio Emilia approach.
For child-centered orientation is when the children’s interests and needs are the detiminer of the content and structure to the curriculum (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000). The teacher is there as a facilitator and to support the children's expression. It is suggested by Gardner (1980) that when adults provide equipment and encouragement, the children’s natural art abilities will show (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000). It is called the progressive approach in Twigg and Garvis (n.d.) article.
Teachers play a larger role with the subject-matter-centered orientation as they pick the content. Zimmerman and Zimmerman (2000) describe it to be “developing children’s capacities for art making, art criticism and appreciation through perceptual-conceptual inquiry ” (p.88) It is also known as DBAE, discipline-based art education which was developed by American art educator, Elliot Eisner (Twigg and Garvis, n.d.). DBAE viewed art as a discipline and “subject worthy of study itself” (like the other subjects taught in the curriculum) instead of teaching art as a form of creative self-expression (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000, p.89 & Twigg and Garvis, n.d.).
Society-centered orientation, also known as community-based art education (CBAE), links art to human and cultural experience. CBAE includes teachers, students, administrators, parents, community members and artists in the experience of art in a classroom or program (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000). Vgotsky’s social-culrtual theory emphasizes the importance of social interactions with others and this art orientation supports his emphasis. It is stated that educators and psychologists “who advocate that children's drawings are influenced by models available in their culture, including popular culture, and that children often imitate the style of drawings they see around them” (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000, p. 90).
Reggio Emilia approach occurs in a full day setting with children aged three months to five years where children learn art through it being integrated into the whole school curriculum (Zimmerman and Zimmerman, 2000). The school community is involved in the classroom too. Twigg and Garvis mentioned it to be the most prominent approach amongst early childhood education and professionals as it ‘acknowledges art as a language and recognises children’s use of artistic media as integral to the cognitive/symbolic expression involved in learning” (p.195).
My Take on the Orientations
As I read the articles for my research, many start off with some sort of sentiment and questioning of what is the most effective way to teach art to early learners and the adult’s role. Reading about these three orientations, I feel like I might have partaking in a mix of them throughout my art education journey. As the teacher/instructor, I find the child-centered orientation only possible when there is a longer duration of time for my students to explore. I also think that there would need to be a strong student-teacher relationship where my students are comfortable with sharing their interest and I am familiar with them. With my art program being only an hour long and for 4 sessions, I believe it would be hard for me to approach it with a child-centered lens; and Reggio Emilia wouldn't be applicable for the program. I wouldn’t say my art education teaching is DBAE or CBAE either as I am not teaching my students the decilipine and only sometimes the parents help support their child’s artwork. How I come up with the art projects is that I google and pinterest art inspiration that focuses on fine-motor skills and can possibly engage the students. I would show an example whether it's the print out or my own creation.
This leads me to the next thing I was interested in researching: is it okay for children to copy/mimic the example? Someone told me once that when you show an example, students do not think or get creative therefore it's better to provide supplies and tell them what you would like to see. I think this approach would be hard for young students who might not find themselves to be creative or have had the opportunity to explore art at home. Upon my research, I read about Frances Derham who wrote a book called “Art for the child under seven.” Within McArdle and Piscitelli's article, they shared how Derham had written a list of “don’t” messages. One of the rules regarding drawing from Derham is “don’t have copying in any form.” This makes me wonder if copying can be seen more so with direct drawings where we ask students to follow us step by step. When I make an example, I purposely make it in a rush so it is not perfect when I am colouring and/or cutting. I then provide my artwork as an example of what they can make with the supplies they are given. I do not enforce any requirements and let the students do what they want to do. I think my approach to providing an example is to have students be inspired, not imitate. One notable experience I had with a three year old student who I will call Chloe, was that they would add additional elements that I didn’t even think of adding. For example, when we did an under the sea scene with a paper rolled up fish, I included rocks and seaweed at the bottom of my seafloor. Chloe, she told her mom that she was going to draw coral; I was impressed how she knew what that was and how she was able to connect it to the sea. After that, for my four to five year old student class, I invited my students to draw coral to their seafloor too. Another time, we did a bunny and pipe cleaner whisker with beads (for a fine motor skill element); Chloe asked me for orange paper to cut so she can make a carrot! Of course, I provided her with the paper so she could include a carrot with her art work. My students would also inspire each other and I thought that was the cutest engagement. Kylie Rymanowicz from Michigan State University shares the reminder to focus on the process, not the product which is why I try to include fine motor skills such as cutting, gluing and grip hold. To focus on the process, it is important to praise the effort as they create their artwork and so they will explore and continue to put effort in their process rather than seeking approval for the final product (Rymanowicz, 2015) Overall, I think having students see an example is helpful for a start of their creativity but one shouldn’t force a result to look identical.
Materials
Reflecting on when we did the activity of brainstorming what comes to mind when we think about materials, it made me think about materials for early childhood art education. I think easy to clean materials is important as I think with creativity, a mess can happen. Working for the program, affordability was important. A tool I created with the material I had was gluing a pom pom to a clothespin for my students to use as dabbers; I was quite impressed with my creativity that day and the students enjoyed using them. While researching, I found the New Brunswick visual arts education grades K-2 curriculum made in 2014. There is a suggested supplies list with consumables and tools. The word consumable was not a word I would have connected to material but it makes sense. The curriculum lists a variety of materials such as paint, crayon, markers, pipe cleaners etc. This would be important to expose students to so they can explore the possibilities of the materials and get creative, sort of like what we did with paper..
Checklist
In PDP, we are told to fill out a template for our lesson plan that states the curriculum, materials, teacher/students etc. However, many practicing teachers do not do this lengthy planning process daily, it is more so an overview or a weekly thought. Therefore, with my research done, I thought of making a checklist to have when planning art lessons for my students.
Art Lesson: _____________
Theme/Topic/Interest:
Skill/Competency:
Duration:
Display location:
Materials
Consumable:
Tools:
Rationale to the Checklist
Theme/Topic/Interest: this can be child-centered or relating to a story or another subject that they students can relate to or understand
Skill/Competency: this can be fine motor skills, language, number, social, emotional, identity related or using a new material and technique
Duration: to ensure students have adequate time to be creative and not feel rushed; it can take 1-2 day for drying glue or paint etc.
Display location: as mentioned by Zimmerman and Zimmerman, it is important to “create a classroom environment that is aesthetically pleasing and inspires children's art making” I think displaying their own artwork to show that their work is worthy for everyone to see would be great.
Materials: I separated it to be two sections for consumable and tools so that I can check on the consumable materials if we have it in stock, and tools would be something I borrow and have to clean and prepare for the students.
References
McArdle, F., & Piscitelli, B. (2002). Early childhood art education: A palimpsest. Australian Art Education, 25(1), 11-15
New Brunswick Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2014). Visual Arts Education Grades K-2 Curriculum [Ebook]. Retrieved from https://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/ed/pdf/K12/curric/Arts/VisualArts-GradeK-2.pdf
Rymanowicz, K. (2015). The art of creating: Why art is important for early childhood development [Blog]. Retrieved from https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/the_art_of_creating_why_art_is_important_for_early_childhood_development
Twigg, D., & Garvis, S. Exploring Art in Early Childhood Education. The International Journal Of The Arts In Society, 5. Retrieved from https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/34998/65037_1.pdf?sequence=1
Zimmerman, E., & Zimmerman, L. (2000). Art Education and Early Childhood Education: The Young Child As Creator and Meaning Maker within a Community Context. Young Children, 55(6), 87–92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42728610













