Charlotta Maria Hauksdotti, Topography Study V, 2017

Product Placement
Monterey Bay Aquarium
EXPECTATIONS
Sweet Seals For You, Always

PR's Tumblrdome

titsay
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
d e v o n
art blog(derogatory)

shark vs the universe
NASA

No title available
will byers stan first human second
$LAYYYTER
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Not today Justin
One Nice Bug Per Day

@theartofmadeline
almost home
seen from Malaysia
seen from New Zealand
seen from Ireland

seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Algeria
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@tarastarr1
Charlotta Maria Hauksdotti, Topography Study V, 2017
In the Silence of the Green Garden, 2024. Bat Ella. Acrylic, oil and pigments on canvas.
"Shimmering night" by Inaslind.
What was happening in the late 70s and 80s for the ads to have that specific black background
@helloelicia
Does OP mean what was happening mechanically with printing?
The short answer is rotogravure, photographic platemaking, and rich black.
The long answer is that magazines in the 70s and 80s (with the exception of National Geographic, which dragged its feet a little and still used a letterpress until 1978) were printed by a process called rotogravure, an intaglio printing technique in which the image (in this case, each page of the magazine) is engraved directly onto a copper cylinder and then rolled over paper to make an impression.
(Apologies by the way if any of this sounds condescending. I work in prepress, and my dad is a master printer, and I never know what people do or do not know about the printing process.)
Anyway, you'd have an engraved cylinder for each color—cyan, magenta, yellow, and black—and you'd roll the paper across each one. And then you'd have a finished page of the magazine.
The alternative to rotogravure is offset printing, which is very similar but uses an oil-and-water repulsion technique on an aluminum plate rather than an engraved cylinder to transfer ink to paper. Offset printing is great for short runs when you want to print a small amount of something that changes frequently. Newspapers are usually printed offset.
Rotogravure, on the other hand, is best for very large jobs that require high quality and more consistency. Color magazines, catalogs, and wallpapers are all things that would be printed by rotogravure.
Rotogravure is also a negative relief printing technique, which allows for more sensitivity when it comes to grade, saturation, detail, dimension, etc. The cylinder itself holds much more ink. Offset, by comparison, is a positive relief printing technique, which means you can't get as much ink on the page. Plus, offset uses flimsy plates (designed to be very disposable). That's why newspapers can look more faded and be less consistent than a magazine.
Additionally, rotogravure uses alcohol as an additive. Offset printing uses water. Alcohol dries faster and creates much sharper halftone dots. Offset halftone dots, by comparison, tend to bleed and soften a little.
All of that is a bit of a preface to the important part:
In the 70s and 80s, most of the printing process was still done photographically. Negatives were developed in a dark room, separations were created by actual physical filters, halftones were created by physical screens, and every page of the magazine was laid out (called a "paste-up," literally with paper, acetate, and paste) and transferred onto printing plates. In offset printing, the printing plates are made by a large camera called a platemaker, which is kind of like a fancy photocopier that prints on special aluminum sheets. In rotogravure, the printing plates/cylinders are etched by chemical or laser using an engraving machine.
Because everything was done photographically, people were highly involved in every step of the process, which meant that printers—the actual people—were very skilled and highly individual. They had their own ink mixes and densitometric specifications, their own machine settings, and their own printing press calibrations. A printing house would therefore have a signature look. And if a lot of big magazines are printed by one publisher (for example Condé Nast, which at one time printed many magazines like Vogue, The New Yorker, GQ, Vanity Fair, and others, but which has since converted some of them to digital only) then all of those magazines would use the same presses, the same papers, the same ink mixes, and the same photographic process.
Thus, they would all look the same.
So let's talk about rich black.
Magazine paper is unique because it's very thin gloss paper. And that's what you want with rotogravure printing, which is all about consistency and sharpness. Newsprint is quite soft and bleeds ink and isn't the most durable stuff. But magazine paper is basically the cheapest nice paper. It's as cheap as paper can be that can still hold a lot of ink. Such as rich black.
In four color process printing (also known as CMYK) there's cyan, magenta, yellow, and black. But 100% black ink by itself is not very dark. It's quite flat and grayish, which is perfectly fine for text (think newspaper headlines), but not very nice when you're trying to print high quality fashion photos in a magazine.
In order to make black look as deep and rich as a photograph, a small percentage of each of the other three colors have to be added to it. Like so:
These days, a rich black mix is all done by computer, and it's all quite standardized. But back in the 70s and 80s, a master printer in a printing house would have their own preferred mix of rich black. And they would use that for all their color printing.
And all of that is why those ads look like that.
I probably explained too much.
@saltyfilmmajor
Toshihisa Fudezuka Rain Song 4, 2018
this is my impression of what it would look like if the toddlers at my job could make traumacore edits about me
Antonio Barahona - Los Platos (2025)
Antonio Barahona (Spanish, 1984), Los platos [The Plates], 2025. Oil on panel, 73 x 100 cm.
starling
I just googled this and… yes, it’s absolutely real.
And there are so many articles and videos and discussions. Like, the scientific community is buzzing about this.
So much research will have to be redone because the data was absolutely compromised, off by orders of magnitude, by using standard lab gloves.
The world is probably not horrifically contaminated by microplastics. Sterile laboratories, however, are contaminated by latex and nitrile gloves.
Thank God someone bothered to check.
>I just googled this and… yes, it’s absolutely real.
Sources beyond dude just trust me, for the skeptics.
Scientists may have been unknowingly inflating microplastics pollution estimates, and the surprising source could be their own lab gloves. A
https://www.technologynetworks.com/applied-sciences/news/scientists-lab-gloves-may-be-causing-an-overestimation-of-microplastics-411138
Nitrile and latex gloves that scientists wear while they are measuring microplastics may lead to a potential overestimation of the tiny poll
Nitrile and latex gloves may cause overestimation of microplastics - Phys.org (it’s a pdf)
Researchers discovered a standard piece of lab equipment has added thousands of microplastic ‘false positives’ per each square-millimeter un
Ordinary Lab Gloves May Have Skewed Microplastic Data: That doesn’t mean microplastics aren’t a problem, though
That should be enough
This is a "technically true but also misleading" type of post.
The links above are all referring to the same University of Michigan study. The scientists from that study underline over and over again that microplastics are still very much a problem. This is more about technical precision than "oh wow we totally overreacted and microplastics are not a problem." They are very much a problem and the scientists say so. This is important work but does not erase the problem.
The graphic at the top was not created by the scientists who published the study. It was seemingly created by a random Twitter user, I wouldn't be surprised if with AI. The big jump on the graph gives a certain impression, but even if the numbers are accurate it gives a misleading impression.
"Stupid scientists didn't even think to check" is a bad genre of post that doesn't actually help.
A Southern Alley - Wenjie Lin , 2026.
Chinese , b. 1986 -
Acrylic and collage on canvas , 180 x 160 cm.
A collage of nine different turtle and tortoise species, specifically showcasing the varied patterns and colors of their shells, Herpetology
Top Row (left to right): Eastern box turtle, pancake tortoise, and Bell's hingeback tortoise. Middle Row (left to right): Radiated tortoise, Florida box turtle, and Burmese star tortoise. Bottom Row (left to right): Spotted turtle, Bourret's box turtle, and European pond turtle.
I am obsessed with how my cats look in webcam night vision. 24x36", white muslin, whole cloth free motion quilting with pieced border, black jaquard textile paint thinned with aloe vera gel.
the season of sleepy orchards, fog, and green
Athena Nangala Granites. “Napalijarri-Warnu Jukurrpa (Seven Sisters Dreaming)
Some flowery things for Toasty Art Mart this weekend in Brisbane!
Looking Back
by Ursula K. Le Guin
Remember me before I was a heap of salt, The laughing child who seldom did as she was told or came when she was called, The merry girl who became Lot’s bride, The happy woman who loved her wicked city. Do not remember me with pity. I saw you plodding on ahead into the desert of your pitiless faith. Those springs are dry; that earth is dead. I looked back, not forward, into death. Forgiving rains dissolve me, and I come still disobedient, still happy, home.