We should follow the Ruri Rocks model and have more science communication done via buxom anime lesbians
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany

seen from Sweden

seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Spain

seen from Germany
seen from Spain
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
We should follow the Ruri Rocks model and have more science communication done via buxom anime lesbians
If anyone's following me who has seen the: they brought dire wolves back articles.
Please understand this is a drastic failure of scientific reporting. What they have done is impressive science, but they have not brought dire wolves back.
They found a few gene fragments that were in dire wolves and manufactured similar in wolves.
To quote a reddit thread: it's like putting a few words of hamlet in another play and claiming its hamlet.
We have put jellyfish genes in cats to make them glow: those cats are not now jellyfish.
It's impressive to be able to identify and insert the genes like that, but these are not dire wolves and, to be frank, do not even resemble current models of dire wolves.
I want to make this clear. It is an impressive scientific achievement.
But the communication here is near outright fraudulent in my opinion.
I am rather dissappointed and can already feel the numerous convos I'm gonna have to have with random people online about this.
I hate being a killjoy.
A Chinese New Year special, made to commemorate the Year of the Horse, featuring the evolutionary history of horses from the little three-toed forest-dwellers of the Eocene around 55-45 mya up to the bigger-bodied steppe-dwellers of the earliest Pleistocene around 2 Mya
The 2026 native plant project is up and running!
We have 10 seed distribution stations set up all around the city, each thanks to a volunteer poster hoster!
This project was made possible by monthly donors of Skype a Scientist and everyone who bought one of our 2026 calendars!
If you want to help us maintain the financial stability required to run programs like this, our mural projects, the squid facts project, our event series, and our scientist-classroom matching program, you can:
1) Become a monthly donor here givebutter.com/SupportSAS26 2) Support our mural fundraiser here givebutter.com/KenzoMural 3) Buy science stuff here squidfacts.net 4) Spread the word about us!
a guide to the exoparia
the presence of the exoparia doesnt actually change much for the way we reconstruct most dinosaur groups, however, it changes some minor things for two of the most well known dinosaur groups that should be taken into account:
link to paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.14242
So, in the book Polywater (about the eponymous "anomalous water," which was "discovered" in the 60's and turned out to be a whole lot of nothing), author Felix Franks provides a list of news headlines to illustrate the media's sensationalist approach to the topic of polywater, and
I fear this phrasing will live in my mind rent-free.