Nikon Full-Frame Mirrorless Observations
Alright, I’ve promised to share my thoughts on the new Nikon Mirrorless camera system, so here it is, but first a few caveats.
I don’t do reviews. Many of the ones you find online (I believe) are just click bait or people in need of validation (or the occasional gas-bag who just likes hearing himself talk.) This isn’t as much a review as my observations from having used the Z7 and more recently the Z6 in the same way as I’ve used every camera I have owned. If they are helpful to you, that’s as much as I could hope for. If they aren’t, then just disregard them.
I am not a person you will ever see produce charts to display the findings of my research. Looking at charts, quite frankly, gives me a headache. Photography has always been where science and art converge, but I have unashamedly placed myself on the art side. I love taking photos, the sound of the shutter, the experience of creating something that didn’t previously exist and the joy of looking back at the images and remembering how they came to be. I have the UTMOST respect for those who spend countless hours examining the science of photography, but I don’t find my pleasure in that domain.
One other disclaimer: my observations are based upon my style of photography, and what works for me, or what is acceptable to me may or may not be acceptable to you. Before making the investment, make the effort to get your hands on a Z7 or a Z6 and decide for yourself if it seems to be something you’ll be comfortable with. There really is no such thing as a bad camera out there, but it all comes down to what you expect, what your level of tolerance is and whether you want to spend time preaching about what the perfect camera should be or you want to get out and capture memories.
I decided, after a great deal of thought, that if I was to give mirrorless a fair chance, I had to go all in, and as a result have switched from a D5 and D850 combination to a Z7 and a Z6. I do believe that mirrorless is the way of the future, and nothing I heard recently at the PhotoPlus Expo in New York indicated otherwise. It is debateable, however, how quickly that will come to pass. Nikon is reportedly preparing the D6 for field testing, but they have also gone on record saying that a D5 type pro-mirrorless body is definitely something that will make an appearance as well. In the meantime, I can do everything I need to do with the two Z’s, and if something changes, I’ve still got all my F mount lenses and could switch back to the DSLR stream, but I really don’t expect to see that happen. As always, it should be the best tool for the job and if mirrorless covers most of my bases, then I’m good.
These are extremely well-made bodies, and although lighter and smaller, they definitely exhibit the Nikon pedigree. I had no issue picking them up and starting to shoot. The menus are familiar, and while there are some differences, they were, for the most part, easily adapted to, and I find now that I have been shooting with them for a while, my comfort level is back to where I like it to be.
I don’t want to sound like Goldie Locks, but the size of the body is also “just right.” It is much less imposing than a full-size DSLR body, and I find that I am more apt to have a camera with me and ready to shoot more often. It still feels solid and the build quality is exceptional, so combined with the smaller size, it’s a nice neat package.
Nikon stressed that both the Z7 and the Z6 were weather sealed, and that has been my experience. I have shot in the rain and in wet snow without issue, which is a big plus for me. You can always find some sort of rain cover, even if it is only a zip-lock bag, but not having to use one makes things a whole lot simpler.
One thing I did notice, that I didn’t expect, was a bit of an issue with the door on the card slot. I have hit it a couple times with my thumb, causing it to come open. This could be a problem in inclement weather, but since I’ve been aware of it, I have been able to avoid the problem.
Okay, so let’s deal with what so many see as a major design flaw: the existence of only one card slot. Would I like to have two? Sure. Is it a deal breaker? Not for me, but maybe it is for you. I frequently change cards and download the images to my iPad or laptop asap as well. I have never lost an image to a faulty card, and through my workflow I minimize the chance of that happening, at least to any great degree. I do believe it is something that Nikon will address in subsequent models, but for now, one XQD card seems to work fine. (I wouldn’t be disappointed though, if the price were to drop a bit, which it probably will over time.
I have tested both bodies with the Nikon’s latest version of the 24-70 2.8 and the 70-200 2.8 as well as the 105 micro, 105 f1.4, and the 14-24 2.8 and found them to work flawlessly despite the need to use the FTZ adaptor. I have not noticed any focusing issues, and the lenses behaved as they did on the D850. The native 24-70 f/4 and 35 1.8 are obviously lighter, but that has been less of a consideration than I would have thought. I still chose the lens I needed for the situation whether it was an F-mount or a Z-mount.
I can’t comment on how the adaptor works with third party lenses as I haven’t used any of them. My personal belief is that you invest in a system: camera body, lenses, flashes, etc. These things are designed to work together, and for me they have now that I’m a Nikon shooter and also when I was a Canon shooter. If Sigma, Tamron, Tokina or any of the others work for you, that’s great, because obtaining results that make you happy is what it all comes down to. Many people lose sight of that. If you don’t take pleasure from the photography you do, why bother?
One problem I did encounter with the adaptor is that because of the design (the bump-out at the bottom) you can’t simply switch between the native lenses and the ones that require the adaptor if you use the spider holder carrying system. The plate that fits on the bottom of the camera juts out just enough that the adaptor cannot swivel into place. If you’re using only F-mount lenses it isn’t a problem because you can connect the adaptor and then attach the plate, or you can stick with native lenses, but you can’t do both without removing and then reattaching the plate. Spider is aware of the problem and are working on it.
It was a nice bonus that both the Z6 and Z7 take the same battery as the Nikon D850, so I didn’t need to buy a couple spares. As well, the battery life in real life turned out to be better than expected. I’ve been able to shoot well over 1,000 images easily with battery power to spare.
Things I had to adjust to
The silent shutter is very nice, and I used it at a baptism without disrupting the blessed event. It is a little disconcerting when you shoot multiple frames and don’t really notice until afterwards how many you took or what they looked like when you review the images, but again, it was a matter of adjusting to something different, not something bad.
Am I the only one that truly enjoys the sound of a high-quality mechanical shutter? I miss that sound, but it seems like a small price to pay. Still, the sound the D5 makes…
The resolution of the electronic viewfinder (EVF) is incredible. It is like watching a very small UHD television. It is such an advantage to be able to confirm settings while looking through the EVF, you are less apt to miss a shot that you might have missed while looking at the back of the camera. Once you become familiar with the layout of the various buttons and dials it becomes simple to stay engaged with your subject and make changes on the fly.
In addition, you can just push the I button on the right rear of the camera and you can
-control the wi-fi connection
-change the shutter release mode
-adjust the white balance
-control active D-Lighting
-turn vibration reduction on or off
There are a number of different viewing modes which can be set with a button on the left side of the viewfinder. You can choose viewfinder only, monitor only, prioritize viewfinder and automatic display switch.
You can also decide where you want to review your images; in the viewfinder, on the monitor or both.
I could see this being a problem for people who shoot birds in flight, or do sports photography, but for me it wasn’t an issue and I actually think it helped me to be more selective about when I released the shutter. With the D5 or the D850 there is always the temptation to “spray and pray,” knowing that you just had to come up with something good if you held the shutter release down long enough (provided your exposure and composition were good.) Now, I find that I shoot less because I don’t want the camera telling me I can’t shoot more, and I’m more selective about what I point my lens at.
It is a busy time of year and I haven’t gotten out as much as I would like to, but I can say that I am not any less happy with the results I have obtained with the Z7 and the Z6. The weight loss is much appreciated and having a camera ready to go more often can’t help but improve the number of opportunities I come across. There are definitely things that need to be worked on (second card slot, larger buffer, higher frame rate) but the roadmap Nikon released shows that there will be a number of improvements to come, many that may already be far along in the development process. Bottom line: both these cameras take excellent photos, and if you’re not a frustrated engineer, you should be able to enjoy using them. There will always be something new and something better, but do you want to spend your time waiting for it, or do you want to spend your time capturing really great images?