Monterey Bay Aquarium

shark vs the universe
🪼
d e v o n
Keni
No title available
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
RMH

tannertan36
almost home

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

oozey mess
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
noise dept.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Mike Driver
sheepfilms
The Bowery Presents
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
seen from Armenia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Bolivia
seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from Maldives
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
@the-lion-rampant
A TRUE EXPRESSION OF LOVE ...
PRINCESS MONONOKE (1997) CASTLE IN THE SKY (1986) THE WIND RISES (2013) WHEN MARNIE WAS THERE (2014) HOWL’S MOVING CASTLE (2004) PONYO ON THE CLIFF BY THE SEA (2008)
I know you don't check here anymore, but I've not given up on you.
Iris Van Herpen ‘Carte Blanche’ spring 2023 couture
A snake story, based on an experience I had while I was in Florida.
we have to bring back art deco like right now
we need more of this.
I am a friend to all cats. Yes even the mean ones. They have their reasons.
Spirit: Stallion of The Cimarron & the Indian Boarding Schools/Residential Schools allegory
Honestly, this shit with Hogwarts Legacy is just like what happened with Chick-fil-A like ten or fifteen years ago. Some of y'all might be too young to remember it, but it went almost exactly like this shit today, only the target was technically gay people (not like we aren't all lumped together when push comes to shove, but gay was the political scapegoat in US politics at the time, as trans people were still on the fringes of social awareness).
It came out that the people who own Chick-fil-A were donating to organizations in other countries that were actively working to get gay people there killed, and were also very monetarily invested in stripping gay people of any legal rights they'd amassed in the US. So a lot of queer folks were asking for allies to boycott Chick-fil-A to show solidarity.
And it turned into a giant fuckin circus for bigots to rally around. There was even a support Chick-fil-A day, I remember it because I was a server at the time and our restaurant was empty most the day - while the line for Chick-fil-A down the road was like a mile long consistently.
But while that was obviously annoying, that wasn't what hit people the hardest. Cuz we expect clowns to wear the shoes, right, it's not shocking.
What disappointed people, or really demoralized a lot of young queers at the time especially, was the allies who would still go there. Because they like the sandwiches or fries or whatever. The people who'd march with them in the parade or be supportive of marriage equality, who would then turn right around and give their money to people who were trying to actively harm their friends.
Because the chicken was good.
I remember a friend of mine being really just absolutely broken up over that, trying to understand some of her friends reasoning and at the time I couldn't give her an answer. I could now, though.
And it's this:
Talk is cheap.
It costs nothing to say things. A person can say whatever the hell they want, any feel good flowery thing, and it doesn't really cost them.
But when they are asked to actually give something up - or put their money where their mouth is and just....can't do it. Well then there isn't much else for them to say, is there? At least nothing that's worth anything.
Some people had to find out the hard way that the choice between a chicken sandwich and funding people who did not believe in their dignity as a human being was, in the eyes of certain allies, apparently really hard. Too hard, in fact.
These allies would march in the colorful parades and go to the bars for drinks, but in the end, you couldn't actually depend on them to inconvenience themselves. They were fair weather allies, and they were there for the party and that's about it . They wanted entertainment, and it didn't matter if that came from having fun gay friends or a tasty sandwich.
This is the same thing, really, or pretty close to it.
These types of people just wanna have fun. Either you, their friend or whatever, are fun or the game is fun, and if you stop being fun by incidentally making them feel a little guilty about where they spend their money , then they might just choose the thing that doesn't make them currently uncomfortable.
And I'm not saying these people who say trans rights online but who also really, really want to play wizard game and already have are horrible people or anything - they're just not very good. They have no real character. And unfortunately there's not much you can do to change that, other than investing time and energy in people who do.
This is such a good comparison, honestly. It’s good for many reasons, the most obvious to me being that the people I know who are still debating on whether or not to get the game are the same people STILL eating at Chick-fil-A to this day. But also, so many of the comments in the notes here are the exact type of pushback you’d see to calls to boycott Jesus chicken on Facebook a decade ago.
“Sure JK is evil but what about all the people that worked so hard on this game? They were just doing their job. 🥺”
Do you remember the article written by the queer person who worked at Chick-fil-A years ago that was essentially, “Please don’t boycott Chick-fil-A because I’m queer and I work here and other queer people work here too. 🥺”
…Yeah, it was an absolute embarrassment. They later went on to make another article taking back what they said when they realized as much.
Doing an unethical job and getting paid less to do it doesn’t make it an ethical job. Doing an unethical job but having less culpability than your superior doesn’t make it an ethical job. These people chose to spend up to around 1/3 of their life selling lemonade that funds conversion therapy and supports homophobic legislation. These people chose to spend around 1/3 of their life making and marketing antisemitism that funds transphobia.
“But what if the boycott actually worked and everybody lost their job?!”
Well, good. I would like it if zero people worked on projects that harm my marginalized friends. That’s kind of the point, actually.
“There’s no ethical consumption under capitalism!”
This. If you’re using this to excuse yourself from doing any work or having any responsibilities as a consumer, your leftism is shit. You are misunderstanding. Do better.
“No ethical consumption” is “I need to feed and clothe myself, but all my choices are owned by the same unethical parent company.”
“No ethical consumption” is “I am forced to be a consumer in a market where my dollar goes to companies which mistreat and underpay employees and destroy the environment.
“No ethical consumption” is being unable to make informed decisions because corporations are constantly behaving unethically without any legal repercussions or negative media attention.
“No ethical consumption” is a rallying cry, not a hall pass.
It’s not realistic to expect everyone to locally and ethically source everything they purchase and make the rest themselves. That would be ridiculous and prohibitively expensive in terms of a consumer’s time and money.
But no one is forcing you at gunpoint to buy a shit video game or a chicken sandwich (I get that food deserts complicate the latter issue which is a whole other thing entirely but in this case I am referring to people who have other places to consume food). And this isn’t some secret knowledge that you have to wade through articles hidden behind paywalls. If you have an internet connection you very likely know why Chick-fil-A and hp are unethical. If you have gay or trans friends you may have even heard directly from people in your circle how these things harm them.
Yes, we have very little power in this system and no, no one is expecting you to run off into the woods and establish a money free society to prevent yourself from accidentally contributing to anything harmful, but don’t you at least want to do something small where you can? Maybe there’s enough right-wing gamers and evangelical chicken enjoyers that these things will always be successful. Maybe the boycott is doomed to fail. But what about you? Don’t you want to be able to say, “I was able to take what little power I have to not contribute to the harm of my friends and other marginalized people in this particular instance?” Don’t we at least owe that to each other?
Yea, all the arguments for justifying their choices are literally identical. Lol. Nothin is original, it's just the same faux concern for employees and feigned helplessness over and over and over again.
They try to put all the responsibility for the parent companies choices on the individual consumer, or rather the people criticizing the parent company - and their decision to support the parent company with their money because they want the product and don't wanna feel guilty about it.
Chik-fil-A is responsible for the employees monetary well being if the restaurant fails because of their choices to fund bigotry. Warner Bros et all are responsible for the monetary well being of the employees that worked to develop their shitty blood libel wizard game.
If y'all actually cared about these workers - this isn't how you'd be spending your energy or money.
You'd be trying to help them organize and form unions.
You'd be supporting workers rights in the restaurant and gaming industries, both of which are predatory, abusive, unpredictable and suck absolute total ass for workers.
You'd be fighting for workers to have a voice, so they could speak out about shitty decisions of the company without fear of retaliation or withold their labor in protest of a shitty decisions like this.
But that's not what you're doing.
Because that's not what you care about.
So don't roll up onto my post and try to act like you do, because we both know that that is horseshit.
instagram | ko-fi