Hi! It seems that some people believe that Malfoy should have gotten a redemption arc rather than Snape. Your thoughts?
Hiya! Well, first of all I think a character getting a redemption arc does not negate another character getting a redemption arc, if that makes sense. So even if Malfoy got a redemption arc, Snape would still be able to get one. And besides that, I am convinced Snape had to get a redemption arc. Harry Potter has a very intricate storyline and the characters are very rarely two-dimensional. Dumbledore was a good character up until the seventh book but he was pretty two-dimensional. Snape was a good character (not a good person, the two things arenât interchangeable) up until the seventh book (hints laid out in the other books aside, considering one may miss them unless aware of the redemption arc) but he was incredibly two-dimensional. You could probably draw the similarities between Dumbledoreâs character development and Snapeâs here: theyâre like two sides of the same coin. Whilst Dumbledoreâs character was âtaintedâ with âevilâ (thus destroying the pure, good vibe around that character), Snapeâs character was infused with good (his tragic story that helped us understand why he is like he is, his redemption, and ultimately his good deeds). Does that mean Dumbledore became a bad person and Snape a good one? Absolutely not. The way I see it, if you take white paint and you put droplets of black in it, itâs going to become grey. In the same exact way, take black paint and put white in it. You still end up with grey.
Malfoy started as an annoying kid and became increasingly dangerous as he grew up. However, from the sixth book onwards, we can see he undergoes a huge character development (which is fuelled by Lucius getting arrested and his fear for Voldemort). At the end of the book, Malfoy is pretty much repentant. Yes, we didnât walk that path with him like we did to some extent with both Albus and Severus, but we have to consider that their redemption arc/character development happened in the span of years and years, and we read about it in a few pages/chapters. This is also why for some people it is less âimportantâ than all the other books and chapters in which for example Snape was portrayed as the arsehole. Malfoyâs redemption arc is -not unimportant- but irrelevant to the main storyline (also happened mainly after Voldemort died, thus not affecting the war, whilst Snapeâs redemption arc was the core of the war and affected the way it turned out immensely). And it starts with the war, but it probably took Draco years and years of self-reflection to truly be repentant and become a better person.
So in my opinion, Draco did get a redemption arc. Did he deserve it more than Snape? No, I donât think so at all. I donât think you can tell who deserves a redemption arc and who doesnât. Itâs never black and white and you canât weigh an evil action and pile it up with the rest of the âbad deedsâ and see if you deem the other pile (the good ones) high enough to erase the bad in someone. Nothing is gonna erase the evil that Snape committed. Nothing is gonna erase the evil that Draco committed. That is why The Dark Mark will never go away completely. However, to grow and become a better version of oneself and stray away from that kind of ideology to never go back to it is a redemption arc. You canât apply cancel culture to a fictional story. That is because obviously in the real world if someone joins that kind of cult they would be cancelled. And even if they were repentant I donât think anyone would ever want anything to do with them ever again. But in the world of Harry Potter there is war, everyone has done questionable things and then done other things that were incredibly noble and selfless and helped the war. In a situation like that, a personâs moral compass doesnât work in the same way and the standards change. Just like murder is still murder, but everyone understands murder when Molly Weasley kills Bellatrix. Of course she did it. And everyone can explain why and âforgiveâ her. So why apply the standards of your moral compass to a world where those standards are obsolete?


















