friendly reminder that these were the proposed names for the color of the universe
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Game of Thrones Daily
RMH

bliss lane

Product Placement
Xuebing Du
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Monterey Bay Aquarium
h

Andulka
art blog(derogatory)
The Stonewall Inn
d e v o n
Interview Vampire Daily

Origami Around
official daine visual archive
No title available
đ
occasionally subtle
ojovivo
seen from Vietnam

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Kosovo
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bolivia
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from Iraq
seen from Bangladesh

seen from India
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
@thepublicscience-blog
friendly reminder that these were the proposed names for the color of the universe
Photo by ĐндŃоК ШпаŃак.
ChaosLife: Nature is Magical
And now for something completely different.
But seriously, evolution is just a giant crapfest.
Jacques-Yves Cousteau adds to historyâs famous definitions of science.
[ BIOCANVAS SURVEY RESULTS ]
Based on a national exam, a majority of American students in grades 4, 8, and 12 demonstrated a less-than-proficient knowledge in scientific concepts. But just by viewing science-as-art images like those found on Biocanvas, students under 18 years old had a remarkable turn-around in their interest for science. In fact, almost all respondents wanted to know what was scientifically happening in each image, and nearly half wanted to study science more.
This post is part of Biocanvasâs ongoing September giveaway. Make sure to like and/or reblog this post and follow Biocanvas to enter!
Thatâs An Odd-Looking Tree âŚ
Simon Lewis and his research team deployed their laser scanners in the rainforest of Gabon recently, (a forestry technique Iâd never heard of before) so they could remotely scan the density of vegetation. Ainât it purty?
Well, they accidentally scanned this. Itâs got a good trunk, but thatâs no tree âŚ
Previously: Airborne laser scanning discovers the remnants of an ancient Cambodian city hiding beneath the jungle canopy.
Howâs that space program coming along?
Always relevant, this week even more so!
Chelya-boom-boom
A meteor burned up above the skies of central Russia this morning, resulting in an aerial explosion and shockwave whose effects injured hundreds near Chelyabinsk. It brings to mind these lines from Samuel Taylor Coleridgeâs The Rime of the Ancient Mariner:
The upper air burst into life! And a hundred fire-flags sheen To and fro they were hurried about! And to and fro, and in and out, The wan stars danced between
Events like this are not rare in Earthâs atmosphere, happening at least once per decade. What made this one special was its chance occurrence over a populated area and the fact that so many Russians have cameras running on their dashboards, like, all the time. Central Russia is no stranger to extreme aerial explosions due to space debris entering the atmosphere, most famously with 1908âs Tunguska Event, a several megaton aerial explosion of a comet fragment that knocked down 80 million trees.
Details about todayâs meteor event are a little fuzzy, but I plugged some data into Purdueâs Impact Earth! meteor event calculator (which is a super fun way to pretend youâre destroying Earth) to see if I could nail down the energy released by this fireball.
From the videos Iâve seen, it looks like this thing entered the atmosphere at a pretty shallow angle, maybe 15 degrees from the horizon. It would have to be pretty dense rock in order to make it that far into the atmosphere without disintegrating, so I plugged its density in as 3,000-5,000Â kg/m3. Russian officials reported its aerial velocity at about 15Â km/second and that it was about the size of a dinner table, so 4 meters across? If you tweak the velocity, density, size and angle a little, you get an airburst of between 2 and 5 kilotons of TNT, or a little less than half the strength of the atomic bomb that exploded over Hiroshima, and an explosion altitude upwards of 50,000 feet.
Seems like a pretty accurate calculation, although the actual altitude must have been more like 30,000 feet to produce the shockwave that resulted in all the injuries. Play around with the Impact Earth calculator and let me know if you get anything better!
Although asteroid 2013 DA14 is making a close flight by Earth today, zipping inside of some of our satellites, but this meteor event almost certainly had nothing to do with that. Space is full of stuff, and every so often we are reminded of that in spectacular fashion.
BONUS:Â This kind of thing happens all over the solar system. Check out this scorched explosion remnant on Mars!
(GIF via amalucky)
Just to clarify, the asteroid skimming through our little circle of space is named 2012 DA14. There's no danger of it hitting us, but a small one that it could hit one of our geosynchronous satellites.
We're not sure exactly what its composition is, but if it were to impact it would probably be similar to the Barringa impact in Arizona and a bit bigger than the mentioned Tunguska event.Â
The Chelyabinsk meteorite (we add the -ite after a meteor survives our atmosphere and makes an impact) is estimated to be about 4m - DA14 is closer to 50m. And NASA estimates that up to 500,000 objects of that size cross Earth's orbit, of which we are aware of maybe 1 or 2 percent.
As both of these asteroids indicate, we don't know nearly as much about what is out there and potentially dangerous to us. Jeffrey Kluger of Time sums it up:
Space is an exceedingly random place. Everything in the known universe may be governed by some pretty hard laws of physics, but so are BBs in a jar when you shake them up and down. That doesnât stop things from getting very chaotic inside. The same extreme arbitrariness is worth keeping in mind as we contemplate our planetâs close brush with an asteroid this week.
NGC 2237: The Rose
âA Rose by any other color, smells just as sweet.â
Would the Rosette Nebula by any other name look as sweet? The bland New General Catalog designation of NGC 2237 doesnât appear to diminish the appearance of this flowery emission nebula.
Image Copyright: Terry Hancock
Inside the nebula lies an open cluster of bright young stars designated NGC 2244. These stars formed about four million years ago from the nebular material and their stellar winds are clearing a hole in the nebulaâs center, insulated by a layer of dust and hot gas.
Ultraviolet light from the hot cluster stars causes the surrounding nebula to glow. The Rosette Nebula spans about 100 light-years across, lies about 5000 light-years away, and can be seen with a small telescope towards the constellation of the Unicorn (Monoceros). [**]
Turaco | Michael Rumiz
Happy Birthday, Pale Blue Dot â the iconic image of Earth seen from space, which inspired Carl Sagan, was taken on this day in 1990.
I'll never not reblog the Pale Blue Dot.
If [insert science] hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet.
Happy Valentine's Day.
Well that's just adorable.
A Digital Heart
Using the worldâs second most-powerful supercomputer, Sequoia, Lawrence Livermore and IBM scientists have simulated the human heart at never-before-seen resolution. By dividing the muscular organ into tiny units (seen above), the electrophysiology and mechanics of heartbeats were accurately created inside of a computer. Some of their methods approach single cell resolution!
Whatâs the point? An accurate simulation of the heart can let scientists research heart problems like arrhythmia without cutting anyone open, and even simulate the effects of certain heart drugs. Perhaps, one day it will help doctors diagnose heart problems just by comparing your heartbeat to one inside a computer.
Of course, if your heart problems are more of the âCupidâ variety, then even this computer canât help you. It will take a lot more computing power than this to figure out love.
For more about this project, check out this guest article from âCupidâ on Energy.gov
Creativity in Science
âThey should have sent a poet,â whispers Ellie in the 1997 film Contact. She is a radio astronomer, and when sets eyes on an alien galaxy for the first time, she has no words for its beauty. Despite being fiction, I think this interestingly highlight for pursuits in arts and sciences to be cross-disciplinary. Many students lose interest in science at an early age because itâs largely âtaught to the testâ, and so there is a decreased focus on creativity and imagination. Even practical experiments allow little room for creativity, as students all expected to get the same resultsâand although this is important for teaching the scientific method, careers in science are not entirely like this: they require creativity and innovation. The infographic above shows the results of Creativity and Education: Why it Matters, a survey by research firm Edelman Berland (note: it is not specifically science-related). The research shows that that 85% of participants think creativity is crucial for problem solving in their career, yet 32% donât feel comfortable thinking creatively. Yet, creativity is what keeps science moving forwards, because it fosters new connections and therefore gives rise to not only practical innovation, but also the creation of new knowledge. Scientists and engineers frequently encounter problems where they must use abstract, creative thinking, and they should be equipped to do this. From an early age, students should be encouraged to let their imaginations run wild, and also to use scientific reasoning to assess and test their ideasâand this approach of being open to multiple disciplines would be beneficial not only to science, but also foster innovation in other disciplines too. In Einsteinâs words: âImagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.â
At top, the Soyuz that we flew here and will fly home in May. Below, the Progress that undocked and burnt up.Â
Seriously, if you aren't following Col. Hadfield, you are missing out on so many beautiful pictures and general astronaut cleverness.
Happy Birthday Charles Darwin
Born 204 years ago today, Charles Darwin was a British scientist who laid the foundations of the theory of evolution and transformed the way we think about the natural world.
Charles Robert Darwin was born on 12 February 1809 in Shrewsbury, Shropshire into a wealthy and well-connected family. Darwin himself initially planned to follow a medical career, and studied at Edinburgh University but later switched to divinity at Cambridge. In 1831, he joined a five year scientific expedition on the survey ship HMS Beagle.
At this time, most Europeans believed that the world was created by God in seven days as described in the bible. On the voyage, Darwin read Lyellâs âPrinciples of Geologyâ which suggested that the fossils found in rocks were actually evidence of animals that had lived many thousands or millions of years ago. Lyellâs argument was reinforced in Darwinâs own mind by the rich variety of animal life and the geological features he saw during his voyage. The breakthrough in his ideas came in the Galapagos Islands, 500 miles west of South America. Darwin noticed that each island supported its own form of finch which were closely related but differed in important ways.
On his return to England in 1836, Darwin tried to solve the riddles of these observations and the puzzle of how species evolve. Influenced by the ideas of Malthus, he proposed a theory of evolution occurring by the process of natural selection. The animals (or plants) best suited to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce, passing on the characteristics which helped them survive to their offspring. Gradually, the species changes over time.
Darwin worked on his theory for 20 years. After learning that another naturalist, Alfred Russel Wallace, had developed similar ideas, the two made a joint announcement of their discovery in 1858. In 1859 Darwin published âOn the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selectionâ.
The book was extremely controversial, because the logical extension of Darwinâs theory was that homo sapiens was simply another form of animal. It made it seem possible that even people might just have evolved - quite possibly from apes - and destroyed the prevailing orthodoxy on how the world was created. Darwin was vehemently attacked, particularly by the Church. However, his ideas quickly gained currency and have become the new orthodoxy.
Darwin died on 19 April 1882 and was buried in Westminster Abbey.
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.Â
Sources:Â BBC
Image Sources: History, SmithsonianÂ