Sean D.H.

I guess I have a Tumblr now.

[danforth]

[freckletriangleofdoom]

Know your rights and don’t let ANYONE stop you from voting!

[catedevalois]

VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE and know your ballot. Learn about local and state candidates. Let’s build the government we need from the ground up

[ladystarflare]

Do keep in mind though, To vote you must be of legal age and have registered to do so.   If either of these things is not right, They have every right to tell you to step out of the way and leave.

[jenniferrpovey]

Trump’s followers are planning on acting as “poll watchers” to make sure the election is not “rigged” (defined by them as Trump losing).

It’s entirely possible we’re going to see some voter intimidation at the polls.

The only person who has the right to tell you to leave if you are not registered is an official poll worker.

Nobody else, including “poll watchers,” security at the polling building, etc.

Only offiicial poll workers, who’s job it is to check you are registered and who you say you are.

[jumpingjacktrash]

if you’re not registered, the official poll worker at the table will tell you how to register. until you’re registered, they won’t hand you a ballot. that’s the legal and proper way it’s done. any other attempt to keep you from voting is illegal.

if the poll worker gave you a ballot, and someone else tries to stop you, take their picture and tell the FBI.

[mzminola]

[Image is a blue box with text in white, it reads:

VOTING IS YOUR RIGHT AS A CITIZEN If an alleged “poll watcher” tries to impede you at the voting booth: 1- Tell him to kindly step out of the way 2- Take his picture with a cell phone 3- Call the FBI FBI Civil Rights Division staff will be available by phone to receive complaints related to ballot access [phone] or toll-free at [phone]. U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Voting Section can be reached at [phone] or toll-free at [phone]. PLEASE PASS THIS ON]

[theseandh]

So being an Independent Republican and someone who goes to our local GOP meetings, the poll watcher thing is real but they are under STRICT legal restrictions.  This is something the Orange County GOP has been firmly informed on. If a watcher sees something, their duty is to speak to a poll worker.  They CANNOT address the voter.  If the poll worker does NOT act, they call a special hotline, the GOP “War Room”, and they contact the DOE. Any party and candidate can have a poll watcher.   Democrats here will do it too.  It is legally allowed.  And they should not be condemned if acting LEGALLY.

[theseandh]

I call my dick the sonic screwdriver.  Because it makes girls scream.

Also it doesn’t work on wood.

[jigglypuffsvevo]

Tomb Raider Cosplay

[flula]

[wnq-astrology]

ZODIAC SIGN FACT # 226

The zodiac couple Aries and Sagittarius deal with confrontation right away instead of avoiding things.

Read more facts here!

[theseandh]

Westworld Fan Theory: Who Is The Man In Black

SPOILER ALERT

So I’ve been reading the fan theories from Westworld. The two that stand out are that MIB is Arnold, the other co-creator, or is Good Guy William, and we are seeing JJ Abrams-style flashbacks.

But I have another hypothesis to who he is?

What if the Man In Black is not a Guest, but a Host?

Think about it…

MIB seems to have a very particular and unique understanding of the world, something that even a skilled human park-goer wouldn’t get.  

But the most obvious clue….when the MIB says these words: “I’ve been here 30 years.  Some may say I was born here.”

We’ve been assuming this was allegorical.  But it isn’t.  What if he was ACTUALLY born there?

This could obviously also prove the theory that he is Arnold, who was left for dead but continues to live.

Let’s delve deeper into this theory real quick, because I feel, the more we delve into this, the more we may realize that it’s all interwoven.

Constantly, we see Bernard meeting with Dolores, in what seems to be some form of form of therapy session.  And in Season 04, he mentions the maze.  We think it may be because he knows the maze exists and develops a connection with Dolores.  But what if Dolores, and the entire situation with her and Bernard, is also a part of the story.

Let’s go one tier deeper from this rabbit hole.  What if Dr. Ford has planned the whole thing TO disrupt the story.  The virus that occurred, giving them their memories, Dolores remembering the church that Dr. Ford showed as a critical part of his storyline.  It seems as if Dr. Ford is trying to sabotage the park.

Maybe because he is.

What if Dr. Ford’s story with Arnold is reversed.  Dr. Ford was the one who wanted to create sentience, and Arnold was the sane one.  Dr. Ford ended up killing Arnold and framing him for his idea, while the whole time covertly working on the operation.

And the MIB?  Well in Season 04, we learn he was a businessman.  Which seems to discredit my theory right?  Not necessarily.

What if the MIB was an early creation of Dr. Ford/Arnold’s sentience machines.  And to test it, he put it through the ultimate Turing Test…our world, where he became a successful businessman.

What if this entire operation is decades in the making?

[theseandh]

The two most powerful words in the English Language are LET and GO.

S.D. Hartman

[theseandh]

I try to live by a simple rule. If you are upset about something, you must ask yourself one question: "Can I control it." If YES, than take control. Change what upsets you. If NO, than accept it. There is no use whining about things out of your control. Simple wisdom

[theseandh]

I think from now on ill have the same philosophy with chicken as fat white women have with men...dark meat only

[theseandh]

Just saw an advertisement where Ashton Kutcher gave customers the choice on breaking their phone or telling their parents on how they lost their virginity. Jokes on you, Ashton, my mom was the first person I called.

[theseandh]

An Analysis of Hamilton: Wisedom

Once again, another philosophical analysis of an otherwise non philosophical production. Today I analyze the musical Hamilton, and simultaneously, historical reality of his life. I found, after listening to Hamilton, that there are several lessons coming from his life. The first, which is minor compared to the major lesson, is that it is important to be principles and to fight for those principles. This is primarily emphasized in the Burr v. Hamilton rivalry. Aaron Burrconsistently tell Hamilton that he needs to be silent and not starting. Hamilton, the hero of the story, Cruz that his methods are the more righteous one. The main lesson however, is that ambition is a virtue when you're at the bottom, but not so much when you are at the top. In other words, pride comes before before the fall. Hamilton rose from nothing, the bastard orphan son of a w**** and a Scotsman, primarily on his ambition and pride as well as his ruthless inability to stop working toward glory. Like all things, pride and ambition are either virtual voice solely on how they are used. When Hamilton was at the bottom, his pride was virtuous. But upon obtaining glory, he desired more. More power, more fame, and eventually, the protection of his legacy at the cost of his beloved. Lord Acton famously said that power corrupts. Hamilton was a glorious man of virtue before power corrupted him. It sas then his ambition became a vice. A key theme is "satisfied". Hamilton was never satisfied. He wanted more. The moral being, it is okay to want more when at the bottom, but be satisfied when you obtain that glory, and dont get greedy. I want to delve into Aaron Burr, the villain of the storyline. Burr had the vice of opportunism. Every action he did, he did for his own personal profit. He took inaction when he felt the risk was too high, and took action only when he would benefit. He was the first corrupt politician However, the mantra "talk less, smile more" does play an important role in the end. Hamilton uses that counsel to obtain his goal. Burr teaches that Hamiltons pretentiousness has people dislike him and unable to work with him. Talking less and smiling, or listening more, aids Hamilton in his eventual goal. Anyway thats my analysis.

[tastefullyoffensive]

by Optipess

[theseandh]

I finally realized why I sucked at frat parties... Its because I have this thing called a brain. Stupid brain, with your comprehension of shit.

[theseandh]

I think the most devastating part of it all, is that no matter how much I give, no matter how much love I provide, I obtain nothing in return, save loneliness and discarding. This has been another moment in Sean Hartmans Late Night Existential Crises.

[theseandh]

Inglourious Basterds: Analysis as Myth 2

I also found that Fredrick Zoller represented the grey area of wickedness. We assume one joins wicked causes, like supporting a fascist demagogue (e.g. Trump), and these people are wicked fascists. But many are righteous people who fall blindly for wickedness. Whether it be the wickedness of a fascist dictator, or someone running to be a fascist dictator, the question is, is one righteous if they support wickedness? And I say yes. Ignorant wickedness, though wicked, does not make one wicked. Ignorant wickedness must always be forgiven, should they desire mercy.

[theseandh]

Inglourious Basterds: Analysis As Myth

So I like philosophically analyzing movies and shows as if they were myths. I guess this is due to recent religious studies and the reading of Joseph Campbells commentary on myth. Technically, all these stories are just contempary myths, and we can find divine or moral allegories in all these things. In this myth, the hero is a ruthless group of guerrillas, who kill without mercy. This begs a moral question I asked earlier, where does one show mercy, and when does one show justice? And to which I proposed that one shows ruthless justice when wickedness occurs, and one shows mercy upon the end of wickedness. Lets face facts though, even after the wickedness, our heroes show no mercy. They ask people to hold their sins open. And I tend to get what they mean. The lesson is be responsible for your sins, do not hide from them.

[theseandh]

So wait, Bill Weasley was General Hux in The Force Awakens? Wow, he was the last Weasey I expected to turn to the Dark Arts.