What I think is pretty damning about this post is the one-sided Anti-Arab narrative espoused by OP.
I think it's rather disingenuous that there's this selective narrative where the Jews are the perpetuate victims when the entire idea of Aliyah to Palestine was on the established idea of forming a colonial outpost in Palestine at the expense of the native Arabs. I've demonstrated before that Zionist thinkers have repeatedly called it a colonial venture, even comparing it to the colonization of the Americas, yet here, we're led to believe that the Hebron Massacre in 1929 happened in isolation, when the Shaw Commission concluded that it was the result of the increasing purchase of Arab land, which led to the expulsion of Arabs from their homes. Furthermore, it is absolutely baffling to me that OP doesn't highlight that many Arabs protected these Jews during the massacre. I can highlight the Abu Rajab family, who hid a group of Yeshiva students or the Abu Sneneh family that sheltered several Jewish families. Curious, why doesn't OP mention the 40 Jewish families that were saved in total, according to historian Hillel Cohen. The fact that OP didn't mention this is a clear indication that Zionists, more than often, will perpetuate anti-Arab racism to exercise this form of perpetual victim-hood while Arabs and Muslims are only predisposed towards killing Jews. Yet as I've demonstrated, this completely destroys the OP's one-sided and anti-arab narrative.
OP continues to hold the colonizers to extreme innocence, regarding them as victims, while the Zionist colonial project was always interested in the expulsion of the Palestinians. Ahad Ha'am, author of the essay Truth of Eretz Yisrael, in his expedition to Palestine in 1890, said in regards to the Arab natives:
The farmers are happy to have a new Hebrew colony founded in their midst since they receive a good wage for their labor and get wealthier from year to year, as experience shows; and the owners of large properties are also happy with us, since we pay them a huge price-more than they dreamed possible-for stony and sandy land. However, if the time comes when the life of our people in Eretz Israel develops to the point of encroaching upon the native population, they will not easily yield their place..
Furthermore, the King Crane Commission report in 1919 concluded that Zionist land purchase that led to the expulsion of Palestinians was creating deep-seated fear and would lead to conflict.
The commission found that "Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase"
The King-Crane Commission Report. 28 August 1919.
New historians, such as Tom Segev and Benny Morris have said that the expulsion of Palestinians were premeditated and even espoused by early Zionists leaders, one notable example here is the founder of Israel, David Ben Gurion, who saw the Peel commission, albeit in failure, as a precursor to the complete takeover of Palestine.
On July 12, 1937, Ben-Gurion confided to his diary:
The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own during the days of the First and Second Temples.⌠We are being given an opportunity which we never dared to dream of in our wildest imaginings. This is more than a state, government and sovereigntyâthis is national consolidation in a free homeland.
Ben Gurion wrote to his son in a letter:
Does the establishment of a Jewish state [in only part of Palestine] advance or retard the conversion of this country into a Jewish country? My assumption (which is why I am a fervent proponent of a state, even though it is now linked to partition) is that a Jewish state on only part of the land is not the end but the beginningâŚ. This is because this increase in possession is of consequence not only in itself, but because through it we increase our strength, and every increase in strength helps in the possession of the land as a whole.
A State at Any Cost: The Life of David Ben-Gurion (2019) Tom Segev
When the Peel commission was rejected by the Zionists, because they believed that they had an inalienable right to settle anywhere in Palestine, David Ben Gurion said:
I see in the realisation of this plan practically the decisive stage in the beginning of full redemption and the most wonderful lever for the gradual conquest of all of Palestine.
Palestine and Israel: The Uprising and Beyond, (1990) David McDowell.
Keep in mind that ALL of this happened before the Nakba and the UN partition plan as part of Plan Dalet. It was premeditated and even laid out as a foundation for the Zionist project to move ahead with the expulsion of the Arabs because David Ben Gurion literally announced that to the Zionist executive in 1936:
The foundation of of our state will be based on a Jewish majority... without it, we cannot fulfill the vision of a Jewish commonwealth.
All in all, this is pure projection and historical revisionism clad in anti-arab racism. OP clearly took points from the comments in the notes to argue in favour of the idea that Arabs are inherently antisemitic and repeatedly mentions the Hebron Massacre as a gotcha. They proceed to cherry-pick various events to victimize themselves, while completely disregard the dispossessed Palestinians and the atrocities the befell them. Why didn't OP mention the Deir Yassin massacre or the Lydda/Ramle massacre? Who knows.
