If all this shitâs for nothing, why do I gotta think about it?
Tony Soprano on life
wallacepolsom

Origami Around
Acquired Stardust
dirt enthusiast
i don't do bad sauce passes
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Kaledo Art

Discoholic đȘ©
hello vonnie

â
will byers stan first human second
Cosmic Funnies
Mike Driver

â
taylor price

JVL

izzy's playlists!
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
AnasAbdin
we're not kids anymore.
seen from Poland
seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from Singapore

seen from Mexico

seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Poland

seen from Malaysia
@theworldthroughmind
If all this shitâs for nothing, why do I gotta think about it?
Tony Soprano on life
If every life is a river, then itâs little wonder that we do not even notice the changes that occur until we are far out in the darkest sea. One day you look around and nothing is familiar, not even your own face
Alice Hoffman, Incantation (via panatmansam)
Nobody is making you feel what youâre feeling. Nobody has the power to make you feel something negative emotionally. Your reactions are caused by how you interpret any situation. This is so important because it means that you ultimately become your own resource of emotional freedom and truth.
Adyashanti (via hollygonowhere)
Happiness is not the absence of problems, itâs the ability to deal with them.
 Steve Maraboli (via purplebuddhaproject)
The reason that this blog is rarely active anymore is because I no longer have anything to say. I have officially assimilated into society.
matrimonialism (noun): the ideology that embraces marriage as a cultural norm.
Cultural institutions, especially ones as deeply revered as marriage, are rarely challenged. Marriage is thought of as inherently good. When someone announces that theyâre getting married, we never tell them not to. But we should. We could save a lot of lives that way (and lose a lot of friends). We never ask them why in the hell theyâre marrying the toothless lumberjack they met at Middleton Sports Bowl; we never let it slip that perhaps they can do better than the obese schoolteacher whose hobbies include paint-by-number and video golf. We donât say anything because itâs not the person that theyâre marrying that weâre celebrating. Itâs the institution itself. And thatâs the problem. Marriage is considered a social good. Even if the people getting (or staying) married donât love each other or stopped loving each other three decades ago.
American culture is overflowing with matrimonialism in every form of media. Think of the bridalmagazines, the New York Times Sunday wedding pages and that apex of matrimonialism:eHarmony, whose website touts: âOn average, 542 people get married every day in the United States because of eHarmony; that accounts for nearly 5% of new U.S. marriages.â Side note: Iâm guessing that eHarmony accounts for an even higher percentage of divorces.
To clarify, marriage isnât inherently bad. Itâs our uncritical celebration of marriage as a category thatâs a problem. While our cultural contract allows us (and in some cases even requires us) to criticize and question the single about their lack of a partner, we canât ask similar questions to marrieds. Turn the usual questions on their heads and youâll see what I mean. Thereâs nothing unacceptable about asking a single person why sheâs not in a relationship. Â But if a woman tells you that sheâs been married for 25 years, youâre not allowed to interrogate her. Youâre supposed to effusively congratulate her. You canât ask her: âWhy have you spent the last quarter-century with that man?â or âDo you ever wish that youâd never gotten married?â
We have to pretend to be thrilled about all of our married friendsâ and familiesâ anniversaries, the longer the marriage, the better. How many times have you heard this: âIâm so proud of [my parents/my friends/those old people down the road] for staying married for forty years! Arenât they an inspiration?â Actually, no, no theyâre not. They bicker. They never have sex. Often they wish theyâd married other people. Sometimes theyâre enemies.Â
Because our social rules forbid us from questioning marital relationships, married people assume that they should feel happy. And because research tells us that marriage makes most people happy, unhappy marrieds conclude that they must be outliers. But a lot of this marital happiness stems from our matrimonialism, our setting up of a society that values marriage. Married people get social approval and all its attendant benefits, so they feel that their relationship should have value, regardless of whether or not theyâre personally happy. âHallie Lieberman
The architecture of the internet must support a global, universal micropayments capability. Â In this way, anyone could charge for information made available online, whether it is music or a program for a future robot. Â A silly YouTube-like prank might generate a windfall for a silly teenager, while a scholarâs writing might be only occasionally accessed, but over a long period might still generate enough income to be of use. Â People could then re-create the best social formula that has been achieved thus far in human experience. Â Middle class people could own something- the information they produce- that would give them sustenance as they have children and age. In order for this scheme to work, there would have to be some structural changes introduced gradually, as I explain in the book. Â This direction is the only way to create a human-centric internet, instead of one that serves the cultists who believe in information more than people. Â It would not attempt to make information free, but instead make it affordable. Â It is worth noting that this is exactly how the web would have developed if the initial design proposal for it, dating back to the 1960s, had been carried out. Â (This was Ted Nelsonâs vision.) Â It is the obvious way to design the network if people are your top priority.
Jaron Lanier (via fifidunks)
Comparing yourself to another person is an act of violence. It is an act of self harm. Even if you compare yourself favorably to one person or group of people, you are building a house of cards that will collapse as you try to stand on it. Self-comparisons are hard to avoid. If we do not compare...
Q:Â I heard that meditation is supposed to empty your mind, free your mind of thoughts. Is that right?
A: That is certainly one effect that meditation can have and, admittedly,having a mind free of thinking can be a very delightful experience. That said, however, it would be a big mistake to say that ultimate happiness or peace is synonymous with not thinking. In Buddhist psychology âthoughtâ is just another sense object like âsoundâ or âvisible formâ and, just as we can hear or see an object without there being any kind of delusion or disharmony within us on account of that, so it is also with thought. There can be a thought in the mind but it can be known clearly and completely for what it is â it is not intrinsically an intrusion on our peace of mind. What makes thoughts problematic for most of us is that we are compulsively prone to believing in their contents â their stories and value-judgements â so maintaining any kind of real objectivity with thought, as we might be able to do with other sense objects like sight or sound or smell or taste or touch, seems like an impossibility. Thought seems to be in a totally different category, although in truth itâs not. With time and the skillful development of meditation, we might well be able to learn to focus and calm the mind to the point where conceptual thought stops altogether. I would see this as a pleasant bonus rather than a final goal. More useful is to aspire and practise to see thought as transparent, insubstantial. In this way, when thought is there â whether deliberate or not â there is no sense of cluttering or entangling within the heart and mind. Its presence is just like a fragrance or a physical feeling, a visual image or a sound â it embellishes the silence and stillness of the mind, rather than occluding or corrupting it
Excerpt from Finding the Missing Peace by Ajahn Amaro.
Get it here.
To practise, we must start exactly where we are. Of course, we can always imagine perfect conditions, how it should be ideally, how everyone else should behave. But itâs not our task to create an ideal. Itâs our task to see how it is and to learn from the world as it is. For the awakening of the heart, conditions are always good enough.
Ajahn Sumedho (via echoshaman)
The purpose of a Zen practice is to find peace of mind. Buddhaâs great insight is that through working with your mind you can find peace. The flip side of that insight is that the reason that you do not have peace of mind is because of your thought habits. Zen is a tradition of practitioners coming to realize what the Buddha realized. In the two and a half thousand years since Buddha, Zen has picked up a lot of baggage. It has travelled from India, through China into Japan, Korea, Vietnam and throughout the world. Zen has developed distinct practices in every country and in every practitioner. That is all baggage. The realization that Buddha had is the same simple realization today as it was when he had it. Put down all of your baggage and experience your essential nature.The problem we encounter when we try to put down our baggage is that we donât know how. When we feel the weight of our baggage and go to put it down, we canât tell what is us and what is our baggage. We have spent a whole lifetime accumulating baggage and we canât imagine ourselves without it. When we suffer from anxiety and depression, we become so identified with our baggage that we may think we donât like ourselves. What we donât like is our baggage. We donât even know ourselves. If we knew ourselves apart from our baggage, we would not only like ourselves, we would love ourselves.To put down our baggage, we practice meditation. That is the most basic Zen practice. The Zen devices that are designed to help practitioners put down their baggage, the koans, the robes, the shaved heads, the tea, the chanting, the paradox can become baggage too. Baggage is complicated that way. To cut through the complication of baggage, simplify things. Put all your baggage down. Donât worry if you accidentally put yourself down in the process. Donât worry.Anytime you feel the weight of your worry, reorient yourself to your surroundings. You can take an hour, or three seconds, depending on how eager you are to pick your baggage up again. Simply breathe in and out and be absolutely perfect in that moment, no baggage. You will find peace right there in your mind. Even in your mind.
Normally, we do not so much look at things as overlook them.
Alan Watts (via stardust-seedling)
No masters, no gods, just experience.
Zen is not about learning.
Its about forgetting.
We are already Buddhas. Each one of us.
As an infant we had no separation of me and you, all things simply were.Â
When we meditate we practice this, we practice bring the mind back to a state of observance without judgement,definition, and separation.Â
We donât add anything to our minds.
We let them return to there natural state.
We become Empty.
Zen is not about learning.
The seed of suffering in you may be strong, but donât wait until you have no more suffering before allowing yourself to be happy.
Thich Nhat Hanh (via thecalminside)
We are here to awaken from our illusion of separateness.
Thich Nhat Hanh (via thecalminside)
"Since we donât know where weâre going, we have to stick together in case someone gets there."
Ken Kesey (via newspeedwayboogie)