Critical Evaluation
This work is a critical evaluation of the progress done by me throughout the screen dance module. I try to provide a definition to what screen dance is, followed by the videos that have characteristics like my video The Tea Party. Quotes are used if they relate to the created work, thus helping to provide an understanding to how different quotes influenced myself as a screen dance producer.
Screen dance is a form of contemporary performance, taking the characteristics of a dance practice. It acts as a possible countermovement to the popular dance genre, exploring the potential for all movements, whether it be extending an arm across the space or moving the mouth in a desired motion, to be considered as dance. There is a stigma associated with the popular dance sphere, which expects dancers to move in a specific way, such as the pirouette of ballet or braceo of the flamenco. As such, development occurs to the fluidity of these movements, but sees defective movements as lacking elegance or unprofessional. When I mention “defective movements”, I imply movements that derive from failing to understand a coach/teacher, or rigid movements that look awkward onstage. Some examples of this are a plie performed without warming up first, which increases the risk of injury, or moving the arms in uncontrolled motions – something that looks unclear as to what the motive could be. Fortunately, instructors inform their students how to perform specific movements in the correct way, to prevent injuries and look aesthetically beautiful onstage at the same time. However, these movements may appear limited to the desires of a performer, who might want to create something aesthetically beautiful without resorting to strict techniques, thus discover alternate methods to create dance-like motions such as technology. This demonstrates the need for some subjects to choose contemporary performance over its popular counterpart, due to encouragement to discover new methods of creating performance and integration of other academia, for example IT. Overall, screen dance uses technology to create dance-like movements out of everyday actions, therefore demonstrating that all movements relate to dance in some way and allows the subject to critically evaluate their progress, similar to practicing a popular dance structure like tap dancing and planning what to do next.
Hansen describes screen dance as “the blurring of boundaries between live and virtual performance is perhaps, the latest succession in this evolution with the use of digital images in stage dance.” (Hansen, 1998) When I look back at the work produced during the creation stage, I see moments where liveness of the performance blurs with how virtual it is, such as the performance taking place in several real-life locations but separated from each other using technology. There are multiple virtual spaces of the rooms I performed in captured on the camcorder, but there is no way for performers to transport themselves to the location of the performance at the same time and date, something that would require time travel to achieve, but possibilities exist with manipulating the space and time of a video with available technology and software, such as Final Cut Pro X.
Elizabeth is a video submitted to the Screen Dance Collective on Vimeo, created by Tori Lawrence + Co. The main performer is a woman who appears in two locations, in the middle of a field and a bathroom of some sort, indicated by the metal bathtub. Her movements appear small and centred around a specific object, as seen in the field where she either lies in the wheat or manoeuvres around the fence. This relates to the Tea Party scene where I move my hands across the table to the camera, whilst pulling a shocked expression. There is also a scene where I drop water from a height into the bathtub, but the shot taken is a mid-shot, revealing most of the body above the bathtub. The bathtub scene in Elizabeth does a similar theme, revealing parts of the body above the bathtub, but not every part featured in the Tea Party appears in Elizabeth. This scene is also a close shot, in comparison with the Tea Party which is mid-shot.
During the creation process of my piece, I tried to experiment with different ways to move the body and produce abstract movements, whilst thinking how to develop a tea party theme. “While some artists deal with the content of screen media, others look to form. Pina Bausch’s live work employs filmic devices that manipulate speed, such as slow motion or the acceleration of events.” (Müller, 1998) I thought of the motions that occur in a tea party, for example the swirling of a finished cup of tea or pouring water into the cup. There were several locations that represented a tea cup, ranging from the bathtub to the Campus Centre corridors, where I lay on the floor and imitated water falling. The idea was to form screen media, having a focus on the abstract movements and characters, whilst the background changed from one to another through the acceleration and slowing of events. I did this to create “montage structures that are indebted to the fragmented character of editing.” (Rosiny, 1990a)
Aside from actually screening film, video and even computer-generated images in performance, representation of computer technologies clip into stage dance through less direct routes. Some dance practitioners have drawn on specific films as a starting point for choreographic ideas. (Dodds, 2001) This quote highlights what possible mediums contribute to screen dance, whether it be from a film, a handmade video or three-dimensional graphics that resemble dance. My screen dance project, The Tea Party, takes inspiration from the Alice in Wonderland series, but distorts the core themes into something creepier and more abstract. It features voices that overlap the video, either relating to self-consciousness or “dance”, the word that appears consistently through. This also relates to the idea of hearing voices and a narrow pool of interests, where the latter correlates to Asperger syndrome – something that relates to me as the performer. I am the main character(s) of The Tea Party, which is another aspect that relates to the comments mentioned above.
The second video I looked at was After Kaprow – Book of Journeys by Rosemary Butcher. It, like Elizabeth, is a solo performance that features a woman. The performance focuses on positioning of the camera, which is an aspect of my performance, but also features small movements that relate to The Tea Party and Elizabeth. There are moments of slowness that relate to my piece, but centres around movements that appear separate from others, or have no correlation with them. I used this theme of separateness in the Tea Party.
I found it difficult at first to create a screen dance piece using the camcorder provided, due to the large number of buttons that did different functions each. Final Cut Pro X was also a complicated program to understand at first, mainly because of necessary functions being hidden away in the program interface, followed by the naming convention for each of the functions. Fortunately, inserting video clips into the timeline was a simple step, as the button for importing media lied on the main interface, making it easy to locate and use effectively. This, coupled with the simplicity of dragging material in the timeline to another location, allowed me to produce my final screen dance project with ease, eliminating the stress I had in mind of having to remember the order of buttons I needed to press. Editing media within the timeline worked to my technological abilities, where moving the mouse left or right allowed me to cut or extend the duration of a certain clip, thus removing any errors made during the recording or editing process.
In addition to economic and political issues, technical and aesthetic constituents affect the images that we see on screen. For instance, certain technical criteria contribute to the type of images that can be made: the quality of film versus video tape; the big screen as opposed to the small screen; the viewing conditions of the movie theatre in contrast to the domestic space of the home, and the technical possibilities of the mechanical film apparatus in relation to the electronic (or digital) video camera. (Dodds, 2001)
The comment mentioned by Dodds above relates to my development of The Tea Party. I used the Voice Memo feature on an iPhone 8 to record sound samples for the project, positioned at random distances away from the object or body part I wanted to record. As such, some of the sound samples appear less clear than others and therefore required modification to improve their quality. I did some practice recordings before the main scenes were decided, which relied on the same phone to materialise. However, these were shots taken during my earlier years on the module, when I had no knowledge how to use the specified camcorder, therefore using the iPhone as a way of recording something with possible potential. It shows how my limited knowledge at the time affected the video quality negatively, due to my iPhone camera having a lower resolution than the camcorder required, thus producing scenes that were unworthy for the final project.
Ultimately, I understand the effort required for the execution of a “perfect” screen dance piece, due to the complications I suffered throughout the creation process, but nonetheless, I managed to solve the problems that arose with experimentation and taking a break where necessary. The overall creation was a screen dance piece that experimented with visuals, sound scaping, movement and alteration of time, but featured unedited pieces that allow the audience to view the performance from my point of view, including the problems I had recording the scenes to my liking. Overall, I felt that the screen dance module allowed me to experiment with new material and develop my knowledge, thus being one of my favourite modules this year.
AZRAK, F; BAHHI, R. (2014) Screendance Introduction [Weblog] SCREENDANCE. n.d. Available from: https://screendanceblog.wordpress.com/introduction/ [Accessed 17/03/2019] (see Tumblr page) HANSEN, S. (1998) ‘Real Time Events’, Dance Theatre Journal. 14(3) pp. 13-15. KAPPENBURG, C. (2009) ‘Does screendance need to look like dance?’ International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media. 5(2-3) p.2 MÜLLER, H. (1984) ‘Expression in Dance.’ Dance Theatre Journal 2, 1, pp. 10-15 ROSINY, C. (1990a) ‘Pina Bausch “Lament of the Empress.”’ Ballett International. 6(7) p. 74 BARUA, O. (2019) What My Body Can/t Remember. [Online film] Available from: https://vimeo.com/groups/screendancecollective/videos/312520874 [Accessed 17/03/2019] (see Tumblr page) BUTCHER, R. (2012) After Kaprow – Book of Journeys. [Online film] Available from: https://vimeo.com/53838083 [Accessed 22/03/2019] SHIMOJIMA, C. (2017) “Do You Like Me Now?” LJOVA and ANATOMIAE OCCULTII. [Online film] Available from: https://vimeo.com/202096541 [Accessed 14/03/2019] (see Tumblr page) TORI LAWRENCE + CO. (2012) “Elizabeth” Trailer // a dance film. [Online film] Available from: https://vimeo.com/50460725 [Accessed 27/03/2019] WEBER, H. M. (2014) SCREENDANCE COLLECTIVE. [Online] Vimeo. Available from: https://vimeo.com/groups/screendancecollective [Accessed 19/02/2019]














