WONDERFUL BEAUTIFUL EDIT MADE BY @damsel-in-mistress 🥹 thank you sweetheart!!
Chapter 9 of Switchblades & Motorbikes is out!!
RMH

No title available
$LAYYYTER

blake kathryn
No title available

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
todays bird
Cosmic Funnies
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

tannertan36
occasionally subtle

roma★
hello vonnie
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Keni
The Stonewall Inn

izzy's playlists!
noise dept.
No title available
taylor price
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Argentina

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
@thranduil-aran-edhil
WONDERFUL BEAUTIFUL EDIT MADE BY @damsel-in-mistress 🥹 thank you sweetheart!!
Chapter 9 of Switchblades & Motorbikes is out!!
Superman, you'll love pompompurin. I've not been doing well so i doodled this to lift my mood :>
there was a great study a few years that went into the whole "ppl online are bigger jerks than irl cuz theres a virtual wall and no repercussions" and the researchers were expecting to see that be the case but it turns out that people who were really angry or argumentative online were also found to just be assholes in person and people who were pretty patient and nice online were found to be patient and nice in real person as well
and it just debunked that whole cynical idea that people will naturally be mean if theres no punishment for it
source another source
the researchers found that being online didnt make people more hostile, but that being online allowed already hostile people to dominate forum conversations, and the less aggressive people were much less likely to reply or engage, ending in just the aggressive people bickering at eachother
My hope for you is never that you hit a word count.
My hope for you is that you find that place again, the one you knew when you were very small, where writing was an endless well of wonder and opportunity.
May that kind of peace find you again; may it keep finding you every time that you forget.
it is my professional obligation to share with you my latest dumbass song
anna.sebelova: TLSP/Øya16 After the show, they were just walking around, talking to people, meeting their fans. Honestly, I’ve never seen a band just jumping down the stage, being so kind, open. Nice meeting you guys, hope to see you soon! (August 10, 2016)
Hello stormcrawlers...
The het couple ever
by Ashley Maczko
Hellfire Murder (2026) Official Artwork by Luciano Vecchio
(this is my legacy, as the outfit guy, so it's my duty to report on the most fashionable mutants of 2026)
A person is dead. But the real question is... who did it? The Fool who simply basks in the glory of the Sun? Was it the Queen, persuaded by a red Devil on her shoulder? Surely, the Peacock & the Dove conspired together, as a flock would do? Perhaps an enigmatic Angel, draped in the shadow of the Moon? A single Butterfly that claps its wings innocently? Maybe the Hound, chasing a secretive Cat, being pursued by the vicious Lioness himself...
Leave it to a lone Wolf and his guiding Star to find out.
I just saw someone reblog Nick Robles’ Nightcrawler thirst trap art and it reminded me that I started reading Secret Six comics because I saw his DC Pride Catman pinup and was like. there’s no fucking way that guy actually looks like that on-panel. no fucking way. this artist is just gay and generous. and then I got my hands on Villains United #1 and was like. oh nvm I know exactly which reference Nick Robles had open. he actually does look like that, damn
Just realised that a jockstrap would be perfect for people with tails, like Nightcrawler
I know Nick Robles thought about this long and hard.
Collection of Nick Robles Nightcrawler, for…uhh…art reasons.
I dont care what anyone says I have always preferred Kurt to be a little fluffy instead of full on beefy
I cant be the only one on this 😭
*jaw drops to floor, eyes pop out of sockets accompanied by trumpets, heart beats out of chest, awooga awooga sound effect, pulls chain on train whistle that has appeared next to head as steam blows out, slams fists on table, rattling any plates, bowls or silverware, whistles loudly, fireworks shoot from top of head, pants loudly as tongue hangs out of mouth, wipes comically large bead of sweat from forehead, clears throat, straightens tie, combs hair* Ahem, you look very lovely.
Nick Robles horny Nightcrawler art, save me. Nick Robles horny Nightcrawler art. Save me, Nick Robles horny Nightcrawler art.
literally just start posting about your OCs. you don’t even have to “properly” introduce them just make them a dedicated tag, tag them on posts that remind you of them, and then start talking about them like everyone’s supposed to already know who they are. i am not joking when i say this method works.
AND CRUCIALLY NEVER APOLOGIZE FOR TALKING ABOUT THEM. IF YOU DO NOT LOVE YOUR CREATIONS ENTHUSIASTICALLY AND UNAPOLOGETICALLY THEN WHY SHOULD ANYONE ELSE!!!!!
literally just start posting about your OCs. you don’t even have to “properly” introduce them just make them a dedicated tag, tag them on posts that remind you of them, and then start talking about them like everyone’s supposed to already know who they are. i am not joking when i say this method works.
AND CRUCIALLY NEVER APOLOGIZE FOR TALKING ABOUT THEM. IF YOU DO NOT LOVE YOUR CREATIONS ENTHUSIASTICALLY AND UNAPOLOGETICALLY THEN WHY SHOULD ANYONE ELSE!!!!!
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allie’s roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. “This night is for the straights,” Swindell’s character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). It’s also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, that’s not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They aren’t the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond “repeal” signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. That’s just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheep’s clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can y’all maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia