Two rules for creating anything.
1) Make it weird.
2) Make it with love.

Andulka
No title available
No title available
we're not kids anymore.
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Misplaced Lens Cap

Discoholic 🪩
official daine visual archive

ellievsbear

No title available
trying on a metaphor
macklin celebrini has autism
Keni
No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

pixel skylines
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Paraguay

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Pakistan

seen from Türkiye
seen from Colombia

seen from Singapore
seen from Venezuela

seen from Canada

seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh
@naryrising
Two rules for creating anything.
1) Make it weird.
2) Make it with love.
Stained glass ao3 logo :P
It's almost hard to believe, but the amazing and gorgeous @moonnogginn and I have collaborated! 💥🦊🐲 The fusion of our styles was so smooth that you might not even notice that I was drawing Foxxian's lineart and then rendering it on Lu's Dragonji lineart, just like she rendered mine one 😸
Why AO3 Doesn't Have an Official App
#AO3 has no official app. All AO3 apps are from third parties – please be cautious about sharing your data with them. For information about why we don't have an app, and tips to make your AO3 experience more app-like, check out our latest news post: https://otw-news.org/yckzuv3v
Afrikaans • Čeština • dansk • Ελληνικά • English • español • italiano • lietuvių kalba • 日本語 • português brasileiro • português europeu • Română • Русский • slovenščina • Српски • Tiếng Việt • Українська
i love Not to jump the gun here but with rozanov’s permission…? i think shane in that scene was feeling fiercely protective over another person for the first time in his life. so bowled over by the intensity of his own emotions that he stumbled back to his hotel room in a daze and immediately jerked off in the shower about it. “what if rozanov got arrested and i had to use my immense hockey wealth to bail him out of jail and it was winter in boston. so he had hypothermia. and he had to live with me while we sorted out the legal situation and i yelled at journalists for him and helped him with his paperwork and hired the best lawyer in the world and nursed him back to health and he was like “hollander……..you saved my life 🥺” and he fucked me soooo hard every night for stress relief (obviously he couldn’t fuck other people. due to the lawsuit) and we fell asleep in each other’s arms afterwards. because there’s only one bed in my apartment and he’s too tall for the couch” stuff like that. normal fantasies
top ten shane hollander shower fantasies:
• holding ilya’s hand while they cross a busy street full of hazards (potholes, roadworks, etc)
• rescuing ilya from kidnappers (he kicks down the door)
• rescuing ilya from a burning building (bridal carry)
• fighting in a gladiatorial ice hockey arena for ilya’s hand in marriage
• massaging ilya’s bad knee and ilya says with wonderment “wowww wow. shane you’re so good at this… you are better than every physical therapist on earth probably”
• saying “he asked for no pickles” to the mcdonalds cashier
• carrying ilya’s bags
• washing ilya’s hair
• applying o’keefes working hands cream to ilya’s calluses
• fuck or die
I had a lot of/still have some vestigial arrogance about quantitative methods over qualitative ones, probably in a combination of scientific misogyny + STEMlord superiority. But doing regression analysis and quant-heavy data analysis makes me realise more and more that you can justify basically any claim with numbers, and that you can construct your research in such a way as to output the numbers you want. which does not mean that all data are made up or that quantitative knowledge is all false. I think stories about scientists straight up inventing numbers or fudging experiments on purpose prove that there is a real difference between fraudulent and non-fraudulent research. but those data must always be narrativised & are always already narrativised. The act of presenting numbers itself is doing some of that narration because you’re already arguing that these numbers are worth presenting
People in the notes are rightfully pointing out common issues with data manipulation and pre-loaded conclusions in scientific research (i.e., the academic version of asking "so, how often do you beat your wife?" and so on), but I should have clarified that I'm not really talking about that. I'm talking about completely legitimate, above-board scientific research.
For example, I've had students ask me (in good faith) how it was possible for international medical bodies to report different counts of COVID-19 cases during the early years of the pandemic. And one of the answers is that you need to first define what you mean by a "COVID-19 case." Do you include self-reported incidences? Waste water data? Geo-fenced social media posts about people complaining about their coronavirus symptoms? Federal estimates? Hospital data? How do you compare countries/territories/substate entities with mandatory reporting mechanisms vs countries/territories/substate entities that rely only on voluntary self-reported cases? And what combination of these do you use? How you construct what you mean by "case" is going to impact the outcomes you report. These different counts of COVID-19 cases can all be true simultaneously, not because numbers are made up, but because they all come out of different methodologies that can be equally valid.
And this is true across all science, not just social science. Bill Clinton said it best lol: "it depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is." This feels obvious when you look at scientific research that uses "skull measurements" as their object of analysis - the concept itself is white supremacist, regardless of how "sound" the research is. But even something as apparently self-evident as a COVID-19 case still requires a definition, and how you define your variables is necessarily going to impact how the research goes and what conclusions are drawn.
These definitions are always embedded in political & social assumptions. And again, this does not mean that science is all made up or nonsense or whatever. There is a widespread fetishism of "objective knowledge" that is itself ideological - the idea that knowledge can be divorced from all historical and political contexts, that you can scrub bias from research and simply report the facts. Valuable, well-supported, well-constructed scientific research is always embedded in these contexts. Not just as a result of researcher assumptions, but of the material context it exists in - what research resources are available, how & what research gets funded, the academy's relationship to the state & non-government bodies that both provide data and use that research to inform policy, the historical relationships universities often have with settler-colonialism and imperialism that give them access to "foreign" research subjects, etc etc etc.
So my overall point (which I didn't communicate well) is that data can always say what you want to some extent, for good and for ill. And research results (at least in my experience) tend to surprise you in ways that require explanations, which themselves can be fully justified, but again, exist within many different contexts that influence how you interpret them - and not just the results themselves, but your own surprise at your results
I wasnt feeling well yesterday but i still tried drawing something for my fav precious bab’s bday!
Autumn season is upon us!. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ I'm opening commissions again.
Additional kudos to you, if you commission is spooky!
Please, read the TOS before commissioning!
Mail me at [email protected]
Quill Lake-Milford Sound (New Zeland)[OC] - Author: Gold-Lengthiness-760
WORD OF HONOR | episode 2
characterpilled Unfollow
[photo of the character]
i love my this. the charactr
characterpilled Unfollow
charac te r. ... ... . .... #FUUUUCK. THE CHARACTER.
characterpilled Unfollow
DOES ANYBODY EVER THINK ABOUT .THE CHARACTER
characterpilled Unfollow
[1.5k word essay about the character] #but like idk maybe im wrong
characterpilled Unfollow
character i love youso badly.
^dash when someone is possessed by The Character core (this post is positive)
Would you do ANYTHING for me?
Very amused by Jacob Tierney's character in Slings & Arrows complaining about gratuitous nudity.
GET TO KNOW ME ♡ Favorite Ships ↳ David Rose & Patrick Brewer "You're my Mariah Carey." "Okay, that compliment could bring me to tears, but I'm not gonna let it. So...I...would like to thank you for all the wonderful things that you said."
I was inspired by the black-out poems made by @playing-with-colors and decided to apply it to the locked tomb series!
Palamedes my beloved
I Love you beanix and Trucy.. I love you forever and ever..
The butterfly man, red clad dude, that one eyepatch gay gambler, I need to put him in a blender
Anyaways I missed my artistic origins of being mainly a painter so quick study with Hua Cheng <3