The second girl at least read the book to confirm that it was shit, she even had Capote on deck as backup. Chick 1 is just lazy
Nope. Girl 2 saw that Girl 1ā²s absolutely accurate analysis was being shut down just because it wasnāt stated in an intellectual way (in spite of its validity). So Girl 2 reinforced Girl 1ā²s opinions in solidarity and made sure that it was absolutely clear that Girl 1 was factually correct. WITHOUT taking credit for her observations (ākim is rightā instead of āActually, kimā) Ā
Girls supporting Girls.Ā
Girls not letting other girls be treated poorly.
If you read thirty pages of a book and hate it, thatās a good analysis. Girl 1 literally said, āIt sucked for these reasons, and I only got through 30 pages.ā She was absolutely paying attention and trying to get it. But if all you get is a headache, fuck that book.
I love this exchange
The first analysis is also deep. She didnāt say that it sucked, she gave specific reasons why. The second girl helped word things better and give more context to the writing process behind the book but the first analysis was solid and insightful and as a teacher Iād be impressed.




































