hey, welcome. my name is Blu. check out the read more for some more information on my account. DNI, BYF/BYI, etc. thanks for coming! fyi, this is a sideblog, so i cant follow back :(
before you follow/interact, please consider the following:
hey again! i'm Blu. i'm an alter in an adult system of too many. i'm a victim of RAMCOA/OEA, so this account may divulge into topics such as child sex trafficking and cult abuse. if that makes you uncomfortable, please feel free to block me, or tags associated with these topics. if you're one of those freaks that likes to discount the experiences of myself or many other people like me, you can unkindly fuck off. i'm not interested in your ramblings about how this doesnt happen or whatever you're going to say about the words survivors choose to use to describe our experiences.
i'm pretty avoidant and "melancholic." I consider myself a jirai, they'll be a lot of potentially triggering content posted on this blog, but I do make a point to also post positivity. I am extremely pro recovery, and i will never post, repost, encourage, or glamorize self harm or abuse here. I will happily share milestones of recovery and anyone who follows along is welcome to do the same. most melancholic reblogs will also have some positivity in the tags, because I am extremely dead set on never finding myself in a hole again.
regarding the things in my bio: IWC (interact with caution) is a general statement due to the fact that I am a programmed system, and my account may contain sensitive content. the cisrabies is an inside joke, so, sorry, youll have to wonder on. xP
this blog is extremely strictly and unkindly anti any system origin other than traumagenic. this includes tulpamancy, willomancy/genic, endogenic, polyminds, or any other word that has been or will be made up from the time of me making this post. this is a strict no tolerance policy and you will see that I very openly post about the bullshit within these communities. CDDs form from trauma. research structural and tertiary dissociation.
this blog is also extremely strictly and unkindly anti paraphile, radqueer, proship, darkship, comship, and any other form of romantization of abusive, harmful, and/or exploitative relationships or behaviors. i do not care what your reason is or what caused you to behave this way, you are responsible for your actions.
I dont have a structured reblog system, but I do tag anything that may potentially have triggering content. feel free to pop me a comment or a reblog letting me know something needs a flash warning or something and i'll probably go ahead and fix it. I just usually use the fast reblog option rather than tagging things. I will always tag in depth mentions of abuse, torture, etcetera. this is the exception.
I made this banner image thing :p feel free to use it, no credit needed. it took me like 3 seconds in ibis paint, and then just a bit longer with cropping in the gallery lol. but I do recommend making your own! its fun and it gives your blog a pop of customization.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
Endos will call themselves punk and then talk about demedicalizing a disability that they see as fun and quirky while ignoring the implication that "demedicalizing" a disorder means that disabled people who need the support will be denied help or no longer taken seriously because it will basically be no longer considered a disability. Which. Listen man i could never feel safe near a group full of people spreading ideas like that
I personally really hate when people protest about being against demedicalizing an actual disorder that needs treatment with "ooohh oohhh psychiatry bootlicker" because I'm like. I had some bad experiences after being misdiagnosed and immediately medicated and dismissed when i mentioned hearing voices as an early teen. Does not mean that i want the whole concept of psychiatry destroyed because vulnerable people like me or other people who rely on medications sadly NEED to rely on things like these. And while there are okay doctors, some of them are BAD bad. (This is where i could fit a shooting lazers out of eyes joke. Ahem)
If people spreading these ideas really cared about disabled people they would be talking about how to hold neglecting professionals accountable in an effective way and giving disabled people an ability to have a say in their treatment without being mistreated or disrespected and dismissed
But it's very easy to talk about getting rid of support for a disorder when a "non disordered" person only sees one of it's symptoms as a fun online hobby or an identity -🌌🪽
Yes! It’s easy to say we should demedicalize things when you don’t have a disorder, without realizing that there are people out there who RELY on medical treatment. Not saying that the medical system doesn’t need huge changes but getting rid of all forms of psychiatric help would kill a lot of people.
This post is going to go in depth on explicit fictional material involving minors, why it's harmful, and the cultural impacts. If that bothers you, I recommend sitting this one out.
What is Loli/Shotacon?
Lolicon is an attraction that is typically erotic to young prepubescent girls, or fictional depictions of them. This term can also refer to fictional material depicting underage girls.
Shotacon is similar, the difference being that the attraction / media is underage boys instead.
Loli/Shotacon, or Lolisho for short, is a term that encompasses both of these things.
Is it Illegal?
Lolisho is illegal in many places, including but not limited to: Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, South Korea, New Zealand, South Africa, Estonia, United Arab Emirates, and Russia.
In many jurisdictions, distribution, production, or possession of child pornography is illegal, including lolisho.
Laws regarding lolisho are often complex, frequently subject to change, and typically not all encompassing.
Does it count as child pornography / CSAM?
Lolisho is often considered child pornography, namely in the countries previously listed where it is deemed illegal.
Typically it is described as a subcategory, labelled simulated child sexual abuse material. (SCSAM)
Why is it Harmful?
Lolisho (SCSAM), Is harmful for a number of reasons. I will list a handful of these reasons and detail them as best I can.
It's important to note that SCSAM is not equatable to real life CSAM, as no children are harmed in the process of making it.*
That being said, let's delve into why lolisho is harmful.
*AI usage in creating CSAM:
Artificial Intelligence is able to create new child sexual abuse material, by gathering data and inputs from pre-existing, real life CSAM. This differs from lolisho, in that real children were harmed in the process of its creation.
AI is easily accessible, and can output new, photorealistic CSAM in the press of a button. This creates obstacles for law enforcement as they may not be able to distinguish it from real life CSAM, which complicates efforts to identify and protect victims.
Additionally, AI can be used to alter pre-existing images of real life children to be sexual in nature. The victims of this are also often threatened with blackmail, harassment, and extortion.
(source)
Normalization of Sexualizing Children & Grooming:
The proliferation of SCSAM desensitizes, and contributes to a culture that sexualizes children. This can lead to an increased demand for, and participation in, real-world contact offences.
Professionals in the field often voice concerns that SCSAM could potentially be used in order to groom children into sexual abuse.
Predators may show SCSAM to children, falsely normalizing abuse, and lowering the child's inhibitions. The aim of this is to later facilitate sexual abuse or CSAM from the child.
SCSAM can also be used to teach children how to engage in sexual activities, showing the child material of happy, excited fictional children engaging in sexual activities.
(source) (source)
Online Acceptance & Community:
Predators can seek community, support, and acceptance online. These things only further the idea that pedophilia is a normal and non-harmful disorder.
Predators can also seek out children within the lolisho / SCSAM community, to target and groom. Victims are often lulled into a sense of security, seeing other adults accepting and enabling the predator's desires and behaviours.
In conclusion?
There are a few other reasons I could have covered in this post, but I fear this is already getting quite long.
These included: Viewing SCSAM reinforcing pedophilic desires, SCSAM creating a market for child abuse, Societal and psychological impacts on children, Impacts on Asian women & children, and so on.
While SCSAM may not be equatable to CSAM, it is still identifiably harmful.
If you or someone you know is being groomed or sexually abused, you can find out how to get help here.
(If I have gotten any information incorrect, or you have any additions, please feel free to notify me or reblog! I am not a professional in this field, this was all done on my own time from my own research.)
This post is going to go in depth on explicit fictional material involving minors, why it's harmful, and the cultural impacts. If that bothers you, I recommend sitting this one out.
What is Loli/Shotacon?
Lolicon is an attraction that is typically erotic to young prepubescent girls, or fictional depictions of them. This term can also refer to fictional material depicting underage girls.
Shotacon is similar, the difference being that the attraction / media is underage boys instead.
Loli/Shotacon, or Lolisho for short, is a term that encompasses both of these things.
Is it Illegal?
Lolisho is illegal in many places, including but not limited to: Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, South Korea, New Zealand, South Africa, Estonia, United Arab Emirates, and Russia.
In many jurisdictions, distribution, production, or possession of child pornography is illegal, including lolisho.
Laws regarding lolisho are often complex, frequently subject to change, and typically not all encompassing.
Does it count as child pornography / CSAM?
Lolisho is often considered child pornography, namely in the countries previously listed where it is deemed illegal.
Typically it is described as a subcategory, labelled simulated child sexual abuse material. (SCSAM)
Why is it Harmful?
Lolisho (SCSAM), Is harmful for a number of reasons. I will list a handful of these reasons and detail them as best I can.
It's important to note that SCSAM is not equatable to real life CSAM, as no children are harmed in the process of making it.*
That being said, let's delve into why lolisho is harmful.
*AI usage in creating CSAM:
Artificial Intelligence is able to create new child sexual abuse material, by gathering data and inputs from pre-existing, real life CSAM. This differs from lolisho, in that real children were harmed in the process of its creation.
AI is easily accessible, and can output new, photorealistic CSAM in the press of a button. This creates obstacles for law enforcement as they may not be able to distinguish it from real life CSAM, which complicates efforts to identify and protect victims.
Additionally, AI can be used to alter pre-existing images of real life children to be sexual in nature. The victims of this are also often threatened with blackmail, harassment, and extortion.
(source)
Normalization of Sexualizing Children & Grooming:
The proliferation of SCSAM desensitizes, and contributes to a culture that sexualizes children. This can lead to an increased demand for, and participation in, real-world contact offences.
Professionals in the field often voice concerns that SCSAM could potentially be used in order to groom children into sexual abuse.
Predators may show SCSAM to children, falsely normalizing abuse, and lowering the child's inhibitions. The aim of this is to later facilitate sexual abuse or CSAM from the child.
SCSAM can also be used to teach children how to engage in sexual activities, showing the child material of happy, excited fictional children engaging in sexual activities.
(source) (source)
Online Acceptance & Community:
Predators can seek community, support, and acceptance online. These things only further the idea that pedophilia is a normal and non-harmful disorder.
Predators can also seek out children within the lolisho / SCSAM community, to target and groom. Victims are often lulled into a sense of security, seeing other adults accepting and enabling the predator's desires and behaviours.
In conclusion?
There are a few other reasons I could have covered in this post, but I fear this is already getting quite long.
These included: Viewing SCSAM reinforcing pedophilic desires, SCSAM creating a market for child abuse, Societal and psychological impacts on children, Impacts on Asian women & children, and so on.
While SCSAM may not be equatable to CSAM, it is still identifiably harmful.
If you or someone you know is being groomed or sexually abused, you can find out how to get help here.
(If I have gotten any information incorrect, or you have any additions, please feel free to notify me or reblog! I am not a professional in this field, this was all done on my own time from my own research.)
jacobvanloon
areudirty
andulkaphoto
stormborns
pixelskylines
kianamaiart
annaxmalina
dededos
