Untitled

[trendtwist]

เปิดแผนโจร

หลอกลวงด้านการเงินและการลงทุน

มูลค่าความเสียหาย : 18 ล้านบาท

พบการโฆษณาผ่านช่องทาง YOUTUBE เป็นการชักชวนแนะนำให้ลงทุนพอร์ตหุ้น โดยคนร้ายได้ทำการวางลิงก์ให้ผู้ที่สนใจกดเข้าไปลงทะเบียน ผู้แจ้งมีความสนใจจึงได้ทำการคลิกลิงก์ พบว่า เป็นลิงก์ บริษัท SPOVA

โอนเงินไปทั้งหมดจำนวน 22 ครั้ง รวมยอดความเสียหายทั้งหมด 18,300,093.15 บาท

รู้ไว้ ไม่เป็นเหยื่อ

ศูนย์ต่อต้านการฉ้อโกงออนไลน์

ANTI CYBER SCAM CENTER

[trendtwist]

My Experience with Makeup Artist Parul Garg | Honest Review & Bridal Makeup Feedback

In this video, I share my personal experience and honest feedback regarding my bridal makeup experience with Parul Garg. This review reflects my own opinions, observations, and expectations as a client.

I discuss: • The booking and consultation process • Makeup look and overall experience • Communication and service quality • What I liked and what could have been improved • Tips for future brides considering a makeup artist

This video is intended to share a personal customer experience and provide information for viewers. Experiences may vary from person to person.

[trendtwist]

UAE Warns About a Large Unlicensed Financial Company in Dubai

The Securities and Commodities Authority issued a notice regarding an unlicensed practice by Golden Brokers Limited – Dubai Branch (Representative Office).

The authority confirmed that the mentioned company does not have any license from the authority to engage in any of the activities or financial services subject to regulation and licensing by the authority, warning investors and urging not to deal with the mentioned company in this matter.

[trendtwist]

KAB Energy’s Kington Tong Ceases To Be Substantial Shareholder

Kington Tong Kum Loong is no longer a substantial shareholder in Kinergy Advancement Berhad (KAB), following the disposal of an additional 25,037,540 shares today. This transaction immediately triggered the cessation of his substantial shareholder status.

According to a Bursa announcement, a review of Kington Tong’s past activities and shareholdings confirms that he has never held any management position or served on the company’s Board of Directors. Furthermore, it was clarified that his previous stake in the company has not exerted any influence on KAB’s management structure or its ongoing operations.

[trendtwist]

“Behind the Glamour: Parul Garg’s Makeup Empire Faces Scrutiny as Brides Share Their Disappointing Experiences”

[trendtwist]

Bay Area tech exec says company lied to get $25M from investors, fired him for speaking up

A Bay Area tech founder has alleged in a wrongful termination lawsuit that his former company and its CEO repeatedly lied to investors, and then fired him for protesting those actions.

In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Santa Clara, Subburajan Ponnuswamy, who co-founded the digital security company Cloudbrink in 2019 and served as its chief technology officer, alleged that Cloudbrink CEO Prakash Mana used false information to secure funding from investors. In the complaint, Ponnuswamy alleged that Mana, who joined as CEO in 2020, had conducted a “‘fake it till you make it’ scheme” by falsifying revenue, purchase orders, and customer quotes in presentations for investors and board members. He also alleged that Mana promised customers Cloudbrink stock in exchange for helping him falsify the revenue.

In a statement from Cloudbrink, the company wrote that it “affirmatively denies Ponnuswamy’s allegations and will be filing a formal denial in court at the appropriate time.”

“Our policy is not to comment on active litigation; however, we can say that Cloudbrink has an impeccable reputation in the marketplace, intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit, and views the allegations as internally inconsistent and nonsensical. The Board is aware of Ponnuswamy’s allegations and remains in full support of Cloudbrink’s current leadership and direction,” the statement continued.

Ponnuswamy’s filing specifically points out Cloudbrink’s $25 million “Series A” funding round, which the company announced in November 2022; the former executive alleges that Mana used fake customer testimony and false revenue information to raise the money. He alleges that Mana then falsified invoices to assuage investors’ “due diligence” checks.

“For some of the falsified revenue and/or customers, CEO Mana did not issue any invoices even after 6 months of claiming the revenue; for other ‘customers,’ CEO Mana created a batch of invoices right around the time of fundraising (months or quarters after claiming those as ARR), just to establish paper trails,” the complaint alleged. “Yet there was no evidence of those invoices ever being submitted to the alleged customer, and no funds were received from them.”

Ponnuswamy reportedly discussed his concerns with Cloudbrink’s board in four meetings with board members, and Mana’s conduct toward the chief technology officer became “increasingly retaliatory,” according to the complaint. Mana allegedly told Ponnuswamy at one point, “If you come into my swim lane, I’ll make sure to take parts of your swim lane.” Mana also asked Ponnuswamy to create fake user and customer accounts, which Ponnuswamy refused to do, according to the lawsuit.

Ponnuswamy alleged in the complaint that his forced exit came after he met in March with board members and representatives from The Fabric and Highland Capital Partners, both of which were listed by Cloudbrink as lead investors in the $25 million funding round. The complaint said Ponnuswamy “presented hard evidence of falsification of [annual recurring revenue] and customer count.”

Two weeks later, the Cloudbrink board told Ponnuswamy that “while it appeared to be true that CEO Mana had been reporting fraudulent customers and revenues to the Board and investors, they could not terminate him for fear it would damage Cloudbrink’s sales operations and customers,” per the lawsuit.

Ponnuswamy alleged that the board then told him they would be firing him instead and that they planned to “‘clean up’ the books.” Then they terminated his contract, the complaint reads. His last day was March 20.

“It became clear that the Company had decided to cover its tracks and side with CEO Mana’s unlawful ‘fake it till you make it’ scheme over lawful business practices,” the complaint reads.

Ponnuswamy wrote in a statement that “high-profile cases like Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried are just the tip of the iceberg, with similar unlawful practices in smaller startups often going unreported or inadequately investigated due to company board complicity.” Two investors named in the lawsuit from The Fabric and Highland did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Ponnuswamy alleges he was fired in retaliation and wrongfully terminated, without being provided the stock options he’d been promised.

“In effect, CEO Mana and the Board waited for Mr. Ponnuswamy to build the technology and ship product, careful not to issue any additional promised options, […] diluted his options, and terminated him because he repeatedly raised concerns about the Company’s unlawful and fraudulent conduct,” the complaint said. Ponnuswamy is seeking lost wages and punitive damages, among other relief.

[trendtwist]

“Quiet quitting” and “time theft” are pennies compared to the $50-$150 million that employers stole from Alberta workers in 2022

There’s been a wave of breathless news coverage and anxious think pieces about “time theft” and “quiet quitting” lately—new buzzwords that the business class are shopping around to suggest that workers are unfairly squeezing their employers. But the modest amount that employers say (without a lot of evidence) they’re being cheated out of pales in comparison to the tens of millions of dollars that are being stolen from Alberta workers by employers every year. That’s no buzz word, it’s real: it’s called wage theft and it was actually a crime in Canada from 1935-1955.

The government of Alberta receives complaints about employers who don’t pay wages to workers through their employment standards tip-line. Employment standards officers investigate those complaints and publish the names, addresses, judgment amounts and contraventions of the labour code of employers who don’t pay their workers the wages they are owed. That means anyone, including you, can search this database to find out if an employer has refused to pay their workers wages that are owed to them.

In the first quarter of 2023 there were more than $187,000 dollars in “unsatisfied judgements,” cases where officers had investigated a complaint, found that the employer had stolen wages from a worker, and levied a penalty against that employer—but the employer still hasn’t paid up.

[trendtwist]

Who has used keepyourhomeip.com or alternative ? Please give me your feedback.

I’ve been looking into some all-in-one solutions for [specific need or service you're referring to, e.g., project management, website building, CRM software, etc.]. After researching a bit, I’ve come across a few options that seem to be highly recommended, but I’m still not 100% sure if it's the best fit for me.

I’m someone who values simplicity and efficiency, so I’m looking for something that offers a smooth user experience and takes care of most aspects of the process in one place. However, I’m also a bit cautious since I’ve heard mixed reviews about some of these services, and I don’t want to end up with something that’s hard to use or unreliable in the long run.

I’ve seen a lot of glowing reviews about [mention the service or tool here] as a top contender for this kind of all-in-one platform, but I’d love to hear from people who have actually used it.

If you have used them - any issues? Are you satisfied with the service, speed, reliablity, etc? What do you like and not like? Anything I should know before pulling the trigger?

Or is there an alternative all-in-one solution out there? I don't trust myself to figure out the process myself but have only heard of them as what seem to be "the best" one stop shop. Open to alternatives if they are out there.

Thx in advance.

[trendtwist]

FINRA Sanctions Morgan Stanley Stockbroker For Altering Commission Records

Barry Lee Garapedian of Westlake Village, CA, a stockbroker registered with Morgan Stanley, has been fined $5,000.00 and suspended for three months from associating with any Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) member in any capacity because Garapedian caused the securities broker dealer to maintain false records or books. Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent No. 2021070477901 (November 28, 2022).

According to the AWC, from July 2014 through November 2016, Garapedian falsified the representative code for 417 transactions when he was registered with Morgan Stanley. Therefore, Garapedian violated FINRA Rules 2010 and 4511.

FINRA Public Disclosure shows that Garapedian has been referenced in sixteen total customer initiated investment related disputes concerning Garapedian’s conduct while associated with securities broker dealers, including Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Morgan Stanley. On December 13, 2008, a customer initiated investment related complaint involving Garapedian’s conduct was settled for $1,500,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Garapedian failed to follow instructions in connection with auction rate securities transactions.

On October 5, 2017, another customer filed an investment related complaint involving Garapedian’s conduct in which the customer requested compensation based upon allegations that Garapedian made unsuitable recommendations of variable annuities and exchange-traded funds.

Garapedian was also referenced in a complaint filed on March 20, 2018, in which the customer requested $106,178.00 in damages based upon allegations that Garapedian made unsuitable recommendations of stocks and closed-end funds.

On November 15, 2018, a different complaint involving Garapedian’s conduct was settled for $110,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Garapedian charged excessive fees, made unsuitable recommendations, and overconcentrated the customer’s accounts in certain stocks, exchange-traded funds, and closed-end funds.

Garapedian was also referenced in a FINRA securities arbitration claim that was settled for $170,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Garapedian made unsuitable recommendations of unit investment trusts, exchange-traded funds, and closed-end funds. FINRA Arbitration No. 18-01057 (July 22, 2019).

On February 26, 2021, another customer filed an investment related complaint involving Garapedian’s conduct in which the customer requested compensation based upon allegations that Garapedian made misrepresentations of material fact in connection with the recommendation and sale of investments.

Garapedian was also referenced in a FINRA securities arbitration claim which settled for $1,414,268.49 in damages based upon allegations that Garapedian made unsuitable recommendations of variable annuities and exchange-traded funds. FINRA Arbitration No. 21-01979 (December 5, 2022).

Garapedian was associated with Morgan Stanley in Westlake Village, CA, as a stockbroker from June of 2009 to February of 2021. On January 31, 2021, Morgan Stanley permitted Garapedian to resign based upon allegations that Garapedian submitted transactions in violation of an agreement.

[trendtwist]

STF HC 88262 segundo julgamento 

Decisão

A Turma, por votação unânime, indeferiu o pedido de habeas corpus, nos termos do voto do Relator. 2ª Turma, 18.12.2006.

Data do Julgamento : 18/12/2006

Data da Publicação : DJ 30-03-2007 RTJ VOL-00201-02 PP-00682

Órgão Julgador : Segunda Turma

Relator(a) : Min. GILMAR MENDES

Parte(s) : PACTE.(S) : CLEITON SANTOS SANTANA OU CLAITON SANTOS SANTANA IMPTE.(S) : HELIO BIALSKI E OUTRO(A/S) COATOR(A/S)(ES) : RELATOR DO HC Nº 49669 DO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA

[trendtwist]

Decisão

A Turma, por votação unânime, indeferiu o pedido de habeas corpus, nos termos do voto do Relator. 2ª Turma, 18.12.2006.

Data do Julgamento : 18/12/2006

Data da Publicação : DJ 30-03-2007 RTJ VOL-00201-02 PP-00682

Órgão Julgador : Segunda Turma

Relator(a) : Min. GILMAR MENDES

Parte(s) : PACTE.(S) : CLEITON SANTOS SANTANA OU CLAITON SANTOS SANTANA IMPTE.(S) : HELIO BIALSKI E OUTRO(A/S) COATOR(A/S)(ES) : RELATOR DO HC Nº 49669 DO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA

[trendtwist]

Decisão

A Turma, por votação unânime, indeferiu o pedido de habeas corpus, nos termos do voto do Relator. 2ª Turma, 18.12.2006.

Data do Julgamento : 18/12/2006

Data da Publicação : DJ 30-03-2007 RTJ VOL-00201-02 PP-00682

Órgão Julgador : Segunda Turma

Relator(a) : Min. GILMAR MENDES

Parte(s) : PACTE.(S) : CLEITON SANTOS SANTANA OU CLAITON SANTOS SANTANA IMPTE.(S) : HELIO BIALSKI E OUTRO(A/S) COATOR(A/S)(ES) : RELATOR DO HC Nº 49669 DO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA