The projector, its illumination, and its position relative to the screen; the atmosphere through which the light passes (with the end of smoking in cinemas, audiences are far less fascinated by the beam of light cutting through the air); and any intervening reflective, refractive or filtering devices placed between the projector and the surface it projects onto. Cubit expresses his belief that we are at the very beginning of understanding how projection might work. Seeing how far it’s come and yet we are still at the beginning stages, is quite astonishing; cause it’s only going to improve over time.
It is this thought that in the process of projection, we might be dealing with becoming, not vanishing. Vanishing points articulate the grounds of all representation in the abstraction of form from phenomenally and thence the risk that, in the absence of the represented, which is the very condition of representation, there can only be the stitching of ideological fripperies over the brute reality of the void. Instead, let's consider the possibility of projection as the typical manner in which all entities, human, animal, organic and inorganic, radiate their signatures across space and time. Cubit speaks on projection as a way of becoming; this is a very positive perspective. In that worlds can be created and generated together. In the production of meaning as the articulation contributes in becoming with one another.