After days of agonizing, pacing around my room, and desperately trying to find my mutuals, my main has finally been returned to me! Thank you so much to everyone who reached out to support me, and please follow the back-up blog @hello-nichya-still-here in case this bullshit ever happens again, I'll be archiving all my posts there too.
You can also still support me on my ko-fi page and follow me on ao3 for my fics and metas.
After days of agonizing, pacing around my room, and desperately trying to find my mutuals, my main has finally been returned to me! Thank you so much to everyone who reached out to support me, and please follow the back-up blog @hello-nichya-still-here in case this bullshit ever happens again, I'll be archiving all my posts there too.
You can also still support me on my ko-fi page and follow me on ao3 for my fics and metas.
You're saying that zutara wasn't supported by the writers and shouldn't have been an endgame. That's a lie! and you can verify this, for example, by reading this post. Zutara has a huge support of writers and actors, she was supposed to become a canon! We were just robbed.
I can show you lots of videos of Grey Delisle saying Azula and Zuko are totally fucking (including one she recorded for my birthday), and there's an infamous clip of Bryke proposing Azula and "The Blue Spirit" as a potential ship in a pannel. Somehow I don't think you'll take that as meaning my OTP is canon and was just robbed of it's endgame at the last second - but apparently tumblr posts are solid proof, therefore my argument is perfect and all you Zutara fans are now gonna have to accept that you ship Katara with a guy that canonically (by the standards YOU GUYS are trying to set at least) loves incest even more than Jaime and Cersei Lannister did. And oh, would you look at that! During one of the times Grey mentioned Zucest, Dante said "The Fire Nation are a bit like the Lannisters." See the links if you don't believe me. WHERE'S YOUR GOD NOW?
Could you pretty please link that zucest panel you just found?
I gotchu, friend.Â
She brings up Zucest at 18:29Â
Bonus:
Grey jokes about Zuk
The one, the only, Grey Delisle has acknowledged my existence for five minutes, and it's all thanks to @dragomer, and now I'll be more insuf
The creators/showrunners, writers, and lead writer have all said a billion times "Kataang was always the heart of the show and by the time the first episode aired we were set on it being endgame. Some people in the crew liked BOTH Kataang and Zutara, but Zutara was NEVER seriously considered as a real possibility for endgame or even temporary romance. The only love triangle ever considered was Aang, Katara and MALE Toph."
It doesn't matter how many interviews yall fake, how many clips you take out of context, how many deleted scenes you claim existed without a shred of proof to back it up, how many times you go "but this actor whose job is ACTING not WRITTING says he likes Zutara" or "This writer that wrote tons of Kataang episodes said the word Zutara once when writting a scene between Zuko and Katara" - your ship is still fanon. That's not a dig at you or saying it's bad, it's just a fucking fact.
Write some fanfic if you like it so much, but don't turn the production of the series itself into your fanfic just so you can lie to yourself about how there was ever any chance of you getting what you wanted in the actual canon.
And for real, you're gonna try to use the LIVE ACTION as proof? The thing the creators disowned? Netflix's over-glorified cosplay session that everyone keeps saying "It's mid at best" is THE argument you go for? Have some goddamn standards, I'm begging you.
BAM Scott Summers animation be upon yee. Tw for đ€ą Charles Xavier /hj (half joking because he IS in here. God I hate him.)
This shit took actual years off of my life. Ik Tumblr isnt a huge fan of giving animations the traction they give like still drawings, but⊠I REALLY hope this doesnât flop TOO bad. It took me weeks. But whatever the algorithm will do as the algorithm does so ig Iâll find out.
I just wanted to post this here because for once Iâm actually REALLY proud of it đ and also I gotta spread Scott angst to the masses so MAYBE at least one more person will read his comics.
Oh, btw, X-Men 97 2x5? Worst episode of my life. Sorry I just had to put it out there. I am DISTRAUGHT.
Alright folks, after 5 years it finally happened, no more job, no more money. To avoid the anxiety and boredom, I shall return to my old ways and be a full-time tumblr/ao3 user, writing absurdly long metas, answering weird/interesting asks, arguing with people, creating pure degeneracy through my zucest fics, and getting death threats from angry zutara fans.
To help your local autistic weirdo out, donate on my ko-fi page. Brazil's money isn't worth anything so 10 or even 5 dollars can buy me a good meal or pay the internet bill for the month.
The Coffin never fooled anyone, the game has always been upfront about its weirdness and the toxic dynamic between the siblings since the very first chapter.
Then this crowd comes along with their shallow, moralistic discourse, trying to dictate what can or cannot be consumed in art, as if playing or reading something like that automatically turns you into a criminal.
And it's not like the incest wasn't also there from the first damn moment. They shared a room (and likely bed) their whole lives. Ashley "jokingly" asked him to get her pregnant and was jealous of any girl that some much as breathed the same air as him, while Andrew said he'd have to be dead for any man to get to Ashley AND wanted to do a romantic suicide with her by jumping off the balcony.
So many people clearly don't have a problem with every scene SCREAMING incest as long as the characters don't explicitly kiss/fuck. Every chapter of the game could end with an implied "And they fucked as the screen went dark" and these people wouldn't complain as long as it gave them just enough room to stay in the denial about liking an obviously incestuous dynamic.
It's the Andrew logic of "I can behave like my sister's boyfriend 24/7, but if we don't fuck, then it's technically not incest"
If Katara ended up with Zuko instead, she'd be remembered as a warrior...
..is the take that's making rounds around TikTok and Twitter currently, that I disagree with. So let's talk about that.
First of, just to get it out of the way, this is a blatantly mysogynistic thing to say. To imply that a legacy of a woman is defined not by her actions but by her man, and that the "soft" guy "softened up" her image to a weak little healer, but the "edgy, cool, bad boy" would have "let" her maintain the edgy image of a warrior.
Way to completely undermine a woman's agency and ability to control her actions and how they are remained in history. Way to water down the achievements of a woman by implying they're so insignificant that she needs the "right man" to make sure they're remembered, and the "wrong man" will let them be forgotten. Way to imply that being remembered as a healer (a "traditionally" female role in the eyes of some of the fandom, because the way the NWT operates affected how fans perceive WT culture in general) is inferior to being remembered as a warrior (a "traditionally" male role, for the same reason as above). Your internalized mysonigy and hatred of everything you associate with femininity or womanhood is showing.
But that's only a footnote I have for this take. Another reason I don't like it is because it doesn't make sense.
In order for Katara to be remained as a warrior, either her greatest achievements that everyone knows and remembers more than anyone else should be fighting-centered, or she'd need to spend the majority of her life as a warrior so she's more warrior than anything else. In both scenarios, it's unlikely Katara would have been remembered as a warrior in any scenario, simply because she's been a healer for longer than she's been a warrior, and boyfriends don't change that.
Katara was active in the battlefield for one year of her life. And then there was no more war. So in order to be remembered as a warrior, Katara would have to retire from everything forever, or do everything she does for a lesser amount of time or with lesser results/effectiveness levels, allowing "Warrior" to remain her most longlasting/successful role throughout her life. And that's simply not like Katara at all. She was never able to be passive to people needing help or support, she would want to do something. And seeing as that "something" wouldn't be "Warrior" (because there's hardly a need for a warrior without a war), she's bound to do something else, for a prologued amount of time, and that something else would ultimately be what she was remembered as, because it'd be what she did for majority of her life.
Now, that "something" could have been scientist or politicians or teacher or cleaning lady or archeologist, but it ended up being a healer. And that had nothing to do with Aang and everything to do with a fact that she's a good healer and she likes to heal. Her healing abilities and their importance have been repeatedly showcased, and Katara's willingness to help people in whatever way she can. A warrior is only needed when there's a war, but a healer is only needed every time somebody gets injured or sick and needs help. And Katara likes being able to help. So, considering she couldn't remain a warrior without a war, she became a healer because these are always needed, everywhere, at all times. And then she remained a healer for several decades, resulting to her being remembered as one. It had nothing to do with Aang, and everything to do with Katara. And dating Zuko wouldn't have changed that.
There's only one way Katara could've possibly remain a warrior after the war was over, and that would be if she joined an army of some type. And I'm sure a mix of war related trauma, plus seeing some level of corruption in most of the armed forces she's encountered, plus not being much of a flag-praising patriot, Katara wouldn't want to join any armies.
So, let's review:
With the war being over, in order to reimain a warrior, Katara must join some type of armed force and continue war-ing.
Katara wouldn't want to do that, so that's out of the question.
Without an ongoing war or military service, the only way for Katara's main point of legacy to be her as a warrior is if Katara didn't do anything else better or for a more prolonged amount of time, allowing the label "Warrior" to keep the spotlight.
Katara wouldn't want to do that, because she doesn't want to be a passive figure in the narrative, she wants to be helpful and impactful. She wouldn't want to retire. She'd become something else.
So remaining in history as just "Warrior" is out of the question. She'll do something else, with more successfully or for longer, and that'll be her legacy.
What will that be? Maybe the skill she's been honing over and over again throughout all three seasons, the skill everyone values and needs because it's indispensable, and the skill she is proud of having and fits with her character and narrative because she likes helping people. Healing!
Flashforward to the last years of her life, Katara has been a healer for decades, she's helped countless of people, saved several lives, maybe taught her craft to somebody that was interested in learning, and her legacy is that of a healer because that's what she spent most of her life being.
You see how, in this cohesive train of thought that concludes with Katara being a healer while remaining faithful to her characterization and making sense narratively, I didn't mention Aang or Zuko once? That's because Katara being a healer had nothing to do with either of them, and everything to do with it making sense for who she is.
If she dated Zuko, would the war he everlasting so she can remain a warrior? Would she join the army to still be considered a warrior even without war? Would she retire after the war and never do anything again to let the war era define her entire legacy? No! She'd still become a healer! Because it makes sense for her character! And she'd be a damn good healer for a real long time, so she'd still be remembered as a healer!
Katara's actions are defined by HER, not any love interests. Katara's legacy is defined by HER actions, not who her husband is. Katara would still be a healer and be remembered as one no matter who she dated, and that's okay! Because she's proud to be a healer and it fits her narrative and character!
And it's misogynistic to imply her being a healer is wrong or bad or lesser than, and it's mysogynistic to imply a different boyfriend would fundamentally uproot her personality and values to the point being a healer doesn't fit her anymore when it's been part of her skillset and characterization since early book 1.
Wow, what a way to start things off with footage of the Neverland Ranch raid from 2003, which was an obvious PR stunt carried out by the prosecution, who aimed to make a media spectacle of it for the world to see. Mind you, they found absolutely nothing in said raid, or in any other raid carried out against Jackson from 1993 onward.
The first person they bring in is J. Randy Taraborrelli, a known liar and tabloid whoreâand donât any of you worry, thereâs plenty more where that came from that Iâll cook as well in other posts.
Randy Taraborrelli has written two books about Michael Jackson over the decades, none of which Michael himself ever endorsed. And in these books, he embellishes many stories about Michael, and throughout the editions of these books, his stories continuously change. He claims to be close friends with Michael (and has for decades), and yet he only met Michael one time because Taraborrelli was head of a Diana Ross fan club and got the opportunity to meet and interview Michael when they were both teenagers. There is exactly one photograph of them together, from the 70âs, pictured below.
In Randyâs book Michael Jackson: The Magic, The Madness he tells a lie that Emmanuel Lewisâ mother did not want Michael to be around the child star and put an end to their friendship. In reality, this did not happen and Emmanuel Lewis himself has stated such. He also tells a tale of the 1993 strip search Jackson was forced to submit to by police, a specific version of a story told in Victor Gutierrezâs book Michael Jackson Was My Lover, a book that he was sued for (along with a slanderous interview in which he told Hard Copy he had a video of Michael Jackson sexually abusing his own child family member),which effectively bankrupted him. He also borrows heavily from Ray Chandlerâs (Evan Chandlerâs brother) book All That Glitters, which ALSO borrows from the above mentioned Gutierrez pedo fantasy novel. In fact, most of MJWML and ATG are nearly identical, aside from the alleged sexual acts. This is because Ray Chandler and the rest of the Chandler family worked with Gutierrez to create this CSA hoax in the first place. Remember, Gutierrez managed to somehow tell these stories first (in 1997), while Ray didnât until 2004. Thatâs Gutierrez telling the exact same version of events from the Chandler camp 7 full years before they did themselves.
Now, letâs move on, seeing as Iâve already displayed all the ways in which Randy Taraborrelli is not a credible source for anything pertaining to MJ.
Martin Bashir is a highly unethical âjournalistâ, yet no outright mention of the criminal behavior he and BBC took part in regarding Princess Diana to be found in this hit piece!
Martin Bashir tells a lie claiming that Michael brought Gavin in to be a part of Bashirâs slanderous documentary LWMJ, yet in the 2005 criminal trial, Gavin Arvizo himself testified stating that Michael planned to have Dave Dave (Davin Rothenberg) in the documentary, and that Bashir then completely omitted Dave Dave from the documentary.
Gavin Arvizo testimony March 14th, 2005. ^
Dave Dave was a close friend of Michael and was an adult at the time, though heâd known Jackson from childhood. Bashir insisted on having Gavin in the movie instead, as Gavin was still a child.
Martin Bashir, in this netflix hit piece, goes on to tell a complete lie about Michael supposedly sleeping in bed with Gavin, and then playing a clip from his movie, despite this longsince being proven edited.
What was not originally aired, and what continues to be perpetuated by the media and these hit pieces is Michael supposedly saying he slept in a bed with Gavin. What he went on to say was âalways give the beds to the companyâ.
Oh and by the way, Bashir told Gavin to put his head on Michaelâs shoulder and instructed them to hold hands behind the camera. Because while Bashir was filming Michael, Michael had his team secretly film him without him knowing. This documentary was proven to be maliciously edited in court, Bashir took the stand and refused to answer questions saying he had protections as a journalist under shield law, and even Gavin said that the portrayal of Michael in Bashirâs film was not truthful.
Letâs move on to the next person interviewed: Diane Dimond.
Diane Dimond has had a 3+ decade career built upon slandering Michael Jackson. She has lied and claimed he possessed CP, she allowed tabloid liars onto her show Hard Copy (a 90âs tabloid TV show), most notable being Victor Gutierrez.
This is the interview Michael Jackson sued him for and won, being awarded 2.7 million dollars, which bankrupted that bitch. Victor then fled the country and was later convicted of the same shit in Chile. Michael sued Diane Dimond too, but she was let off the hook, claiming journalistic privilege. Same thing Bashir did. Noticing a pattern yet?
đŹ 0  đ 4  â€ïž 19 · The origin of the ânude photos of boys being found at MJâs propertiesâ allegation came from a tabloid TV show called Hard
additional post Iâve made with sources about another lie in these allegations Diane Dimond allowed on her show ^
and yet another source to show the ways in which Diane Dimond allows lies to run rampant. this video shows proof of a boy being coached to lie on MJ. it aired on her tv show Hard Copy. ^
She smiles here with glee at seeing footage of Gavin with Michael, recalling the Chandler allegations. Why the apparent happiness if she believes it to be true? It is not shocking Dimond finds glee in guilting Michael Jackson; she clearly holds a deep contempt toward him. Look no further than how she speaks of him here in this video I posted.
đŹ 1  đ 3  â€ïž 20 · I can't believe Maureen Orth is allowed to be able to write at all after that racist bullshit from 2003. Like seriously? V
Not only did Diane Dimond state of Victoria Gutierrez (a self admitted pedophile and NAMBLA member) âIâve never had a doubt about this person, ever!â, but she was in bed with the prosecution and DA Tom Sneddon during the trial and the media swarm leading up to it. They regularly leaked biased info to her which she reported.
Diane, in Netflixâs doc, lies and states that the 1994 Chandler civil settlement is what caused the Chandler allegations to never go to trial. However, what no one makes mentions of is that the Chandler allegations and evidence from 1993-1994 were tried alongside the Arvizo case in 2005âs criminal trial.
This was due to CA Evidence Code 1108, otherwise known as âprior bad actsâ evidence, which allows a prosecution in the state of California to bring in evidence of an alleged similar sex crime against a defendant even if they were never previously charged, such as in Jacksonâs case. This means that the Jury did in fact hear and see evidence of BOTH allegations, and still met a unanimous not guilty.
What she also fails to mention is this: IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A CIVIL SETTLEMENT TO PREVENT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OR CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE UNITED STATES!
Nothing can stop the government from charging someone with a crime. Jackson was forced into a settlement with the Chandler family due to his rights being violated by the judge, and being deposed for the civil trial while the criminal investigation was pending. Had he given deposition, it would have revealed his entire defense to a prosecutor actively hunting him down, which the DA could then take and use to tailor his criminal case against Jackson.
The criminal investigation continued for half a year following this civil settlement. The reason the Chandlerâs never went to trial in 1994 was because they stopped cooperating with the police, and the accuser Jordan Chandler refused to testify. Despite his refusal, DA Sneddon brought 2 grand juries (one in LA and another in Santa Barbara) to review evidence for the case. They convened, reviewed the evidence and heard witness testimony from 400+ people, and then said they wouldnât indict Jackson.
She goes on later in this doc to tell a tale of complete fabrication with ZERO evidence to substantiate it, a story she made up and put in her book where she tells plenty of other lies. She claims Michael was âentertaining a group of teenage boys who all spoke Germanâ, where they were all, Michael included, heavily drinking liquor and smoking cigars. Yeah, likely story there, Dimond.
Honestly, I would need an entire thread to go through Diane alone, but letâs move on to Vincent Amen.
Vincent Amen alleges that Michael Jackson gave Star Arvizo the nickname âblowholeâ, showing off Polaroid photos that were evidence in the 2005 trial. But this is a lieâStar Arvizo testified and stated numerous times that HE chose that nickname for himself and stated he made it up himself.
Star Arvizo cross examination testimony March 8th, 2005 ^
Now, to address Vinnieâs lie about nudist magazines with kids being circled in a magazine for order:
Which he has been telling for decades and selling to tabloids mind youâŠ
There is ZERO evidence to prove Michael ever owned such a thing, let alone circled things like this. Vinnie even went to the prosecution and they deemed him inconsistent and non credible, refusing to call him as a witness. The prosecution, who called upon some of the least credible people Iâve ever seen in any court case, chose not to call this guy who claims he had proof that MJ was trying to get ahold of CP? Yeah, again like Dimond, likely fucking story bud.
Amen owns this magazine, and has for decades, sold stories about it for decades, but supposedly itâs MJâs? What the hell, sure!
DA Tom Sneddon who was spearheading the prosecution never notated anything about Helios or any such related DVDs that Amen claims were circled throughout any court filing or within any search warrant and seizure from 2003-2005. And none of the items supposedly circled were ever found in Michael Jacksonâs possession.
Michael did own nudist magazines from the 1930âs which were not pornographic, as confirmed in actual documentation. None of these materials had DNA evidence on them, either, as confirmed in forensic examiner testimony.
Michael owned thousands of books of all sorts of things, and collected all sorts of stuff. The man was borderline a hoarder. Said ânude childrenâ were not the focus of these magazines. They were part of a nudist community. Any pornographic or erotic material found focused solely on adult women.
And I should also mention: Vinnie Amenâs wife, Rina Oh, was literally a pimp for Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein victimâs have accused her of this. đ€đ€đ€ Me thinks this circled CP is his idkkkkkkk guys lol
Now, letâs talk about Dr. Stanley Katz
Dr. Katz came into contact with the Arvizo family through Larry Feldman. Larry Feldman was referred to the Arvizo family by their at the time attorney Dickerman, who admitted to referring them in his testimony. It was stated that Feldman was the âgo-toâ guy on anything Michael Jackson, which is quite peculiar, seeing as Feldman only ever worked on ONE case involving Michael Jackson: the Chandler allegation of 1993. Similarly, Dr. Katz admitted that Larry Feldman was plotting to file a civil lawsuit on behalf of the Arvizo family, which Dickerman corroborates in his testimony, stating he has a fee-sharing arrangement with Feldman.
Of course, DA Sneddon lied to the media and claimed the Arvizoâs didnât want money, yet both attorneys they had stated otherwise and the psychologist they queried did as well.
After being referred to Larry Feldman, Feldman then referred the Arvizo family to Dr. Stanley Katz, a psychologist who specializes in the field of child sexual abuse. More importantly, this is the same exact psychologist that interviewed Jordan Chandler in 1993. Dr. Katz was formerly also involved in the highly controversial McMartin preschool trial. He was the Director of Training and Professional Education at the Childrenâs Institute International (CII). Kee McFarlane, who initially interviewed the McMartin children, worked under him. During his cross examination at Jacksonâs 2005 trial, Dr. Katz testified that he did the assessments of the McMartin children. The CIIâs role in the McMartin case has been widely criticized in professional circles. Their interviewing techniques are considered coercive and manipulative which may lead children to make false allegations of sexual abuse.
Dr. Stanley Katz, who operated his organization CII in the 1980âs, and one which resulted in HUNDREDS of falsely coerced child sex abuse allegations and mass hysteria, was the prosecutionâs star witness.
Credibility? Nada đđ»
Remember, if you donât fact check, that means you donât care. So donât eat garbage from Netflix and take it as truth. I still have 2 more parts to power through, and I intend to, but for tonight Iâm clocking out and enjoying the rest of my evening free from glue sniffer delusions đ€Ł
Iâll leave you with these two comprehensive threads discussing both the Chandler allegations from 1993 as well as the Arvizo allegations from 2003-2005 for your reading pleasure đ
đŹ 0  đ 6  â€ïž 14 · The Chandler Allegations · On August 17th,1993 the Los Angeles police department opened an investigation against Michael J
đŹ 1  đ 0  â€ïž 10 · The Arvizo Allegations · Here we will be breaking down the timeline, inconsistencies, provable lies, and evidence of the A
And to all my fellow moonwalkers out there, stay fun and fresh and keep silencing these lying assholes
PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS POST!! AND READ IT IN FULL!!!
This is extremely important for newer fans who may be more gullible to false narratives about Michael, and this is ESPECIALLY important to anyone who has watched the documentary (fan or not), who may possibly believe in any of the bullshit it is trying to spew.
The documentary is incredibly biased and NOT a reliable source on the allegations against Michael!
Crazy how these fuckers never stop trying to slander Michael through tabloid nonsense that is easily disproven through things that have been public information, and that the fans have been collecting and sharing, for YEARS.
Was not aware of how bad Taraborrelli had gotten though, damn. I remember the book Magic and Madness being a mixed bag of reliable, unreliable and "sources, please?", but it's wild to know he made shit up himself instead of just poor/biased research and tried to pretend he was Michael's personal friend, holy shit.
Turbin Limited Word @turbin-merlin - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
gamechangershow
izzy806
dailybridgerton
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
andulkaphoto
pixelskylines
