New Commission Sheet
Check out my sheet of Terms beforehand. Bluesky: @Twinkee Tumblr: @Twinkee Twitter: @TaintedTwinkee Email: [email protected]
One Nice Bug Per Day
sheepfilms
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Product Placement

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Today's Document
No title available
🪼
Sweet Seals For You, Always
we're not kids anymore.
h
todays bird

Discoholic 🪩

JBB: An Artblog!

Love Begins
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

oozey mess
No title available

izzy's playlists!

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Türkiye

seen from France
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany

seen from United Arab Emirates
@twinkee
New Commission Sheet
Check out my sheet of Terms beforehand. Bluesky: @Twinkee Tumblr: @Twinkee Twitter: @TaintedTwinkee Email: [email protected]
This was drawn on a steady soundtrack of Toybox, Günther and the Vengaboys.
The Vengaboys you say
she wears short shorts i wear pant pants
Pokemon Heritage Post
that’s his little guy!!
I wish I had what they have...
transgender
um actually there's nothing wrong with letting cats be outdoor pets. your cat is depressed locked inside forever. it's animal abuse. let it outside. more cats should be let outside more often. especially overnight.
based on that one breaking bad comic
"just go to a food pantry"
"get a second job"
"start your own garden"
"stop buying name brand"
"don't get your nails done"
"learn to budget"
"live within your means"
Temporary individualistic fixes will never solve systemic issues! God forbid EVERYONE eats and not just me!!
I'm very very glad that my knee-jerk, gut-feeling, primal-instinct reaction to seeing a Default Influencer is embarrassment. I think this saves me from a lot of bullshit.
Some lip-filler lady on enough Ozempic to euthanize a horse: "The sad truth is an elite lifestyle takes money and discipline. Buy these brands on credit if you have to. Skip meals."
Me: "Oh. Oh I'm physically experiencing the effects of secondhand embarrassment. You live like this? This is your life? Your interiority? If I was anything like this I'd kill myself I think."
To be clear ☝️, absolutely not gender-exclusive. Some broccoli-haired shirtless 23-year-old man on enough trenbolone to euthanize a different horse starts talking about how to be a high-value male and I start thinking instantly about how I'd have 4,000 slugs use me as a jungle-gym before I'd want this man within cootie-contagion distance of me.
Respect for my soldiers… she’s saving him… the hons…
people needdddd to wear headphones in public because while on an otherwise very lovely walk in the park today i saw a guy sitting under a tree watching a porn parody of the star wars prequels
if nothing else trying to tune out the sounds of anakin and padme going to town as i contemplate the babbling brook gave me a brief but vivid window into what it’s like to be obi wan kenobi
Sometimes I have days where the name of my most recent follower keeps changing but my overall follower count stays the same, and I know I've been exceptionally successful at pissing people off that day.
You actually just have one guy who follows you, unfollows you, changes his username, then follows you again
Inadvisable tabletop RPG jam premise #137: Game jam where each entry consists solely of paratextual discussion of the mechanics of a hypothetical or invented RPG; examples include an errata document, a developer Q&A, or a forum thread debating the correct interpretation of a particular rule.
@shoutyourporpoise replied:
I could SWEAR you’ve made this post before, or perhaps this is such a characteristically “you” concept that I already imagined a world in which you had
I don't think so, no. I did once (unintentionally) curate a game jam about writing supplements for invented or hypothetical games, the product of which you can find here, but this is a different thing.
(If anyone really wants this one to be a thing, though, feel free to toss your entry into the reblogs. I'm not going to do a proper game jam on itch.io or whatever because its UI really wants you to have cover art and a promotional blurb and such, and this doesn't feel like it warrants it!)
"NO VEGAS"
The indie ttrpg community really really needs to start talking more seriously about player safety for kingdom processing roleplay.
I want to start by stressing that I really like KP roleplay. I'm a big fan of single player KP games already, I love Breath of Evil and Dragon Citadel, and I think the whole independent roleplaying KP world stuff is really cool. I keep seeing amateur mages circulating so many cool hacks to implement real KP game mechanics into their cursed cartridges like character creation and pause powers and NPCs, and crafting and mailing out cursed carts to your play group is very #aesthetic. Really cool.
And I think the POTENTIAL of LARP in a custom KP world with its own setting and its own stakes and real powers is really exciting. But it's also really dangerous!
Don't scroll, I'm not talking about dangerous the way you think.
That's why I wanted to stress up top that I know KP games, I play KP games.
When you exit the game back to the upper world, it's "like it never happened." No physical injuries or changes, back in your old body exactly as you left it at the moment you clicked play and got pulled in. But the experiences inside are still real.
BoE fans are going to know exactly what I'm getting at here, but I'll inform everyone else who's not a horror game buff as an example: In the beta version of BoE, you literally could not quit out of the game except in bunker rooms. And I don't mean couldn't save your progress, I mean the menu bangle did not have a quit option.
There were beta players who got stuck inside for hours, literally over 24 hours in one case, being stalked and attacked and mauled by demons. Beta players got diagnosed with PTSD. The company was sued.
You can't say it's "like it never happened," when you're really in the game. And frankly, I think people talking like it is are irresponsible.
I've literally seen people saying that it's "immature" to act like this is a problem, that it's no different from upper world LARP or even from playing D&D at a table, it's just storytelling, it's YOUR responsibility to separate the fiction from your real feelings, etc etc etc, and it's kinda fucked up!
I think some people in the community use the argument that it's just roleplay to vent or get away with certain things that feels "consequence-free" when it's inside a KP world, or that they can convince their play group is consequence-free. You can say you've got lines and veils and X cards and all the stuff you'd use for safety at a tabletop game, but those measures are not good enough for KPRP. It's a different experience.
You know the phrase "what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas?" A lot of people in the community are talking like that about KPRP, that what happens in the KP world "stays" in the world, and it's really irresponsible. So I want to suggest, respectfully, a mindset of safety conscious play that I'm calling "NO VEGAS." We aren't going to Vegas. We're going to a pocket dimension that's just as "real" for us and our experiences as the upper world. So here's the rule:
Treat everything you're planning to do inside as if you were planning to do it for real, in real life.
Yes, you have PHYSICAL safety measures, you can appreciate the reality of those. So no one can get "killed" if you're doing a combat oriented game, for example. But you're still going to be fighting "for real!" It still hurts and it can still be an upsetting experience to be seriously injrued, or to get attacked and hurt by your own friends, potentially lethally! So negotiate and discuss the play as if you were taking up MMA in real life. Listen to each other's concerns and accept boundaries and take respectful combat and good sporting conduct SERIOUSLY, as if you were going to full contact spar for real.
If you're planning a highly emotional relationship oriented game, this is even more important! Play-acting emotionally intense dialogue is a lot like mundane-world LARP, but anything your characters do with each other physically, negotiate it as if you are really going to do it in real life. That means taking consent and boundaries completely seriously at all times, and and it means respecting the feelings of any other romantic partners involved to the SAME degree as if it were real physical intimacy in the upper world, outside the game.
I cannot BELIEVE I have to say this, but if your "character" has sex with a friend's "character," you need to take that seriously as if you were doing it out of character. If your romantic partner is upset about it because you didn't talk about it with them, frankly they're fucking right to be! (I'm not going to name names regarding any recent drama, I've seen this happen way more than once anyway, please do not name any names in comments.)
And this is another big one. Playing a character of another gender at a D&D table or something is one thing. Lots of people do that casually. And doing it in upper world LARP is costumes and theater. But KPRP with changed or conjured bodies is genuinely a really different situation on a really personal level. Anyone who's messed with custom characters in KP games knows what I'm talking about, it can be a stunning, alien, surprisingly intense experience just walking around as a person you're not familiar with.
"No Vegas" applies here: treat it the same as your coplayer experimenting with their gender in real life. That means being respectful of their preferences, of how they want to talk about it, and ESPECIALLY being respectful of their wishes on who gets to know and who doesn't. (Again, I've seen this happen a lot, PLEEEAAASE no naming names on this either, I really should not have to explain why.)
They might not have any complicated feelings at all and just be messing around! That's fine! But even then you STILL treat it with the same respect and the same privacy, again, just like if they were doing it "in real life" outside the game.
Lastly for amateur mages and GMs setting up your KP worlds: don't make the same mistake as the BoE beta. Make sure your players can always exit at any time. You wouldn't physically lock your players in your room for a normal game, don't lock them in your cartridges for KPRP. There is NO justifiable reason to do so, ever.
We're all here to play games. We're all here to tell stories. We're exploring ideas for fun and we're very used to relying on the barrier of fiction to make it easier to do so. But please appreciate how visceral and how personal these experiences of play can be. I always call it "the upper world" and not "the real world" because as I said, the experiences are real. Respect that when you discuss and play your games. No Vegas.
Inadvisable tabletop RPG jam premise #137: Game jam where each entry consists solely of paratextual discussion of the mechanics of a hypothetical or invented RPG; examples include an errata document, a developer Q&A, or a forum thread debating the correct interpretation of a particular rule.
GarbletheDarble: Does anyone actually understand how the interaction between chrysopoeia and metastasis is supposed to work?
Wormbutt [MOD]: Please check the pinned post
Enzzyme: another one?
GarbletheDarble: I checked the post, and it does not explain the altered order in which to make my trigram rolls.
Enzzyme: oh yeah lol
Enzzyme: a column of the 8tf table was just missing from the og rulebook
Wormbutt [MOD]: As stated in the pinned post, we recommend not using the class. It’s underdeveloped and was likely a late addition.
GarbletheDarble: how did this even ship
Enzzyme: i think lizzie has a working replacement
Enzzyme: @ GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD give us your furnace table
Enzzyme: @ GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD
Enzzyme: @ GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD
Enzzyme: @ GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: ok jeez im here!
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: you could’ve just sent it yourself!
GarbletheDarble: sorry, I didn’t mean to bother
Enzzyme: yeah but I can’t answer follow up questions
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: EightTrigramFurnaceTable_fixed_final(2).pdf
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: and there won’t be follow-up questions. it’s entirely self-explanatory
Wormbutt [MOD]: It’s really not.
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: literally what’s unclear about it
Wormbutt: the “applicable modifier”
Enzzyme: which modifier to use
Enzzyme: lol
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: it’s your exegesis bonus, and if you don’t have one just use your secondary class attunement
GarbletheDarble: what if I have neither of those
GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD: then your build is so awful you’ll die before it matters anyway
[GREATANDTERRIBLELIZARD was warned by moderator]
Page 1
1 2 3 4 … 12 > >>
Inadvisable tabletop RPG jam premise #137: Game jam where each entry consists solely of paratextual discussion of the mechanics of a hypothetical or invented RPG; examples include an errata document, a developer Q&A, or a forum thread debating the correct interpretation of a particular rule.
@shoutyourporpoise replied:
I could SWEAR you’ve made this post before, or perhaps this is such a characteristically “you” concept that I already imagined a world in which you had
I don't think so, no. I did once (unintentionally) curate a game jam about writing supplements for invented or hypothetical games, the product of which you can find here, but this is a different thing.
(If anyone really wants this one to be a thing, though, feel free to toss your entry into the reblogs. I'm not going to do a proper game jam on itch.io or whatever because its UI really wants you to have cover art and a promotional blurb and such, and this doesn't feel like it warrants it!)
r/bladesunderaharvestmoon
Does the bonus for 3rd degree sword forms stack with svartelf off-hand technique or not?
The core rulebook says it does, explicitly, on page 138: "Bonuses from legacy-specific techniques do stack with advanced sword form bonuses."
...and sample characters in, for instance, the Duels by Moonlight supplement are built to show this.
But I was looking at the latest Eastern Front module, and on page 34 there's a footnote that says: "Remember, sword form bonuses never stack with any other bonus."
So which is it?
This really needs to be in the FAQ. The sentence from the core rulebook is a typo; it was meant to say "do not stack." The typo wasn't caught until after the first print run was published, and when it was they silently corrected it for the second print run but never issued it as a formal errata. The result is that some versions of the core rules say "do stack" and some say "do not stack." Furthermore, they must not have communicated the change even in-house very well, because some of the supplements were written by people using the first-print-run edition and some by people using the second-print-run. This has been a source of confusion ever since the game came out, and the fact that the supplements don't agree with each other just makes it worse. Besides which, if you dig through the forums you'll find people with passionate opinions about what the rule *should* be, in both directions. Some tournaments even ban svartelf characters to avoid the whole issue. So honestly, at this point, just play it how you want.