🖤🤍VampGhoulette's Fic List 🤍🖤
Here is a master list of all of my fics. This will be updated as more are posted. They mostly consist of Ghost but there are other fandoms that may get tossed in there.
art blog(derogatory)
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz

⁂
occasionally subtle

No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
🪼
ojovivo
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

JBB: An Artblog!

#extradirty

if i look back, i am lost
Cosmic Funnies
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
No title available
seen from Spain
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Ireland

seen from South Korea
seen from Singapore

seen from France
seen from Argentina

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from United States
@vampghoulette
🖤🤍VampGhoulette's Fic List 🤍🖤
Here is a master list of all of my fics. This will be updated as more are posted. They mostly consist of Ghost but there are other fandoms that may get tossed in there.
Good job everyone, good job 👏
I am proud to have contributed to that.
What I feel like will happen in the second Ghost movie:
The concert delivered by Perpetua goes smoothly cut with a few scenes of him back stage like what happened with Copia.
But afterwards, Perpetua is alerted by someone (a ghoul, an assistant, someone) that his brother was in hospital in critical (or decent) condition.
But I don’t know if they’ll give us a cliffhanger. Having them meet within the movie is definitely logical and having them meet in a character doesn’t feel right at all.
Share your theories, this was just mine.
So Copia can see Ghosts right? So could Sister. I wonder if Perpetua will meet him but as a Ghost.
Omg omg omg!!! New Ghovie!!!!
“creator chose not to use archive warnings” tag on ao3 means a fic may or may not contain things that are triggering and taboo, but the author chooses not to tag them and they choose not to say if there’s any at all. it means proceed at your own risk.
if a fic contains heavily triggering/taboo topics that are not properly tagged, but the author uses “creator chose not to use archive warnings”, then that tag alone means they’ve already tagged everything ao3 requires from them, even if they don’t tell you what these taboo topics are. so the only way to find out is to actually read their work. it means you know the risk and still choose to read their works. you cannot be mad at the author, because they’ve basically told you to proceed at your own risk.
so no, this is not against ao3’s terms of service. this is what “creator chose not to use archive warnings” tag is for.
fanfic writers deserve better
if we post too fast, we get accused of using ai (no, you don't know how fast someone can write. you don't even know if the "too-frequent-to-be-human updates" you see are something that have long been finished and sitting in an author's drafts for god knows how long. just because it's recently posted, doesn't necessarily always mean it's recently written too. a lot of writers finish the whole thing first before they start posting it chapter by chapter).
if we take "too long to update", we get people pressuring us to "update faster" even though fanfics are our hobbies and we write for ourselves first and foremost.
if our works are grammatically correct, we get accused of using ai (some of us just love correct grammars).
if our works are not grammatically correct, we get insulted/criticized (mind you, not everybody writes in their native language. kudos to writers who write in their second, or third, or fourth language — I'm willing to bet a lot of people who criticize fanfics because of poor grammar can't even speak other languages besides english).
if our paragraphs are "too long and too detailed", we get accused of using ai.
if our paragraphs are "too short", we also get accused of using ai.
if we are autistic and we write in ways some deem "too robotic", we get accused of using ai.
some people just don't use their brains to think "ai was trained on human-made works, it was trained to look human-made. ai writes this way because the way it writes is the way real humans write — real humans whose works it was trained to mimic". instead they somehow disregard this logic and think "hmmm this work looks ai-generated. I will engage in witch hunt, be a bully and harass writers whose works I don't vibe with".
reblog if you’re anti censorship and against harassing real people over fictional characters
being a writer is
50% daydreaming about plots and writing
50% procrastinating/suffering during the actual writing process