everytime you reblog this tumblr gets gayer
YOU ARE THE REASON
Game of Thrones Daily
EXPECTATIONS
cherry valley forever
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement
No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
noise dept.
★
ojovivo
taylor price
Noah Kahan
No title available

@theartofmadeline
hello vonnie
𓃗
No title available

seen from Vietnam
seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from Peru
seen from Canada
seen from Bolivia

seen from United States

seen from Ecuador
seen from Chile
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Singapore

seen from Bangladesh
@vee-b-jeebies
everytime you reblog this tumblr gets gayer
Cute little Shassie Comic I came across. If you haven’t seen it, you should! Their account on here is this
(Not my art, it’s from the comic)
finally watched sparkle on raven YAY
this cat sniffs gay people. rb to put him on ur blog
Natural Black Hair Tutorial! Usually Black hair is excluded in the hair tutorials which I have seen so I have gone through it in depth because it’s really not enough to tell someone simply, “Black hair is really curly, draw it really curly.”
The next part of Black Hair In Depth will feature styles and ideas for designing characters and I will release it around February. If you would like to see certain styles, please shoot me a message!
YES! BOOSTINGGGG FOR MY FOLKS WHO WANNA/NEED TO KNOW HOW
THATS RIGHT!!! TONIGHT in about 2 hours WE'RE GONNA BE STREAMING PEAK in a series of fundraising events to get my GFs from MONTANA out to WASHINGTON where i live!!!!! catch it live at my twitch!!!!!!
i will never be against piracy ever but i also need physical media to remain
the average blockbuster carried about 3x as many films than that that are streaming on Netflix or any other streaming service, physical media along with piracy is more important than ever.
I thought this wasn’t true, because how could it be true? How could one small store have more movies than an online database? So I googled it.
I am surprised and depressed to learn it’s 100% true, according to google. A Blockbuster store was required to have a minimum of 7000 titles, but most averaged about 10,000. Netflix has 4000 movies. (And 1800 tv shows if you want to count those, but even included, it’s still less)
Now I’m even more depressed about the collapse of physical rental stores.
BONUS: They weren't beholden to Who Owns What IP Right Now. They got videos from everyone. You didn't have to pay separately for the rights to rent from the Disney Shelves and the WB Shelves and bler bler bler, and they only STOPPED having those movies when the tapes broke or someone never returned 'em.
friendly reminder that your local library will have lots of physical media and if they don't have what you're looking for you can most likely ask them to purchase it or order it from another library through interlibrary loan
Shoutout to Scarecrow Video- they have over 148,000 titles, most of which you can rent by mail. Rentals have been down in the last few years so they're asking for support!
boosting this for Scarecrow Video. It's also now a non-profit.
If you're in Western Massachusetts there's Visions Video a newly opened non-profit membership-based video rental that has an amazing selection (according to the website they currently have around 14,000 titles and hope to double that amount soon)
new york and LA people come say hi if u can ^_^
could not find the original unextended version of this anywhere on this hellsite to try and reblog it so im just reuploading it myself
wannabee twitter already bending the knee to terfs
here's the article (Aug 20 2025) and here's the main points:
The controversy began when trans writer and YouTuber Jessie Earl (aka Jessie Gender) was suspended for 24 hours after simply posting: “I also wish ill on JK Rowling.” [...] They also clarified they "wish on JK Rowling everything that she wishes upon trans people."
[...] The post that originally got Earl banned was a quote of another trans writer, Gretchen Felker-Martin, whose own account had been suspended after she wrote, “I hope someone splits her skull.”
[...]
Earl’s quote made no mention of Felker-Martin’s phrasing, but Bluesky moderators lumped their post into a violation involving “threats of violence” and “incitement of self-harm,” according to an investigative report by Assigned Media. The report quoted Earl saying the phrasing “was mild—especially compared to Rowling’s own rhetoric about trans people.”
Other trans users who posted similar variations, including author Dani Finn, were also briefly suspended. However, the report also noted that BlueSky largely left smaller accounts alone.
Finn’s post was later reinstated, and Bluesky admitted it had been wrongly removed. Earl and Felker-Martins’s posts have not been restored.
[...] users note that simply “wishing ill” on someone isn’t the same as abuse, especially considering the harmful language Rowling uses against the community.
“If their definition of ‘harm’ includes ‘wishing ill,’ words have lost all meaning,” Finn said. “They can censor any criticism they don’t like.”
Here you go all 4 ifg fans take these
And this
TW: Discussion of rape accusations.
[For the love of God read this all the way through.]
I'm going to speak to you guys from the perspective of someone who has been sexually assaulted. Who did not accept that's what happened to me until roughly a year after it happened. Who made excuses and downplayed what me abuser did to me. Who likely wouldn't have gone to the police about the incident even if I had the motivation to do so directly after it happened-- by just, not being able to handle the way I know they would have treated me. Someone who was a profoundly imperfect victim, who accidentally basically did EVERYTHING wrong to make myself look as untrustworthy as possible to anyone who didn't know me or visibly witness the full context of everything that happened, and thought for two seconds more about the series of events that took placd. An element of our relationship, my abuser actively weaponized against me among our peers. I am a person with first-hamd experience of the optics not being on my side. Of someone who DID have evidence of at least SOMETHING not okay doing down between us at least, though no definitive proof of the details-- that I was terrified to actually show anyone, because as guilty as it made my abuser look, it also made me look as pathetic and small and as easily manipulated as I felt.
Of being someone not actually entirely certain if I was full on raped or not until YEARS later-- only because my abuser kinda sorta half admitted to it? Not that they said, "oh I raped [Liquid] and it was high-key a bop." But that they admitted sex occurred between us, which they characterized as consensual-- while I know it wasn't. Because I was all the way black out drunk and woke up in media res.
That it MIGHT have even happened more than once-- but that they consistently only did so when I was too high or drunk to really know, and I have absolutely nothing for any other time something might have went down. So. I just have to eat that L. Booboo I'm the fool.
I know EXACTLY what that kind of soul obliterating experience that is. I even know what having this experience litigated in the court of public opinion is like-- though not online, which is probably ten times worse. Don't fucking come at me with any sort of, "oh police bad, justice system broken, victims should come out, scream out until they wake heaven itself with their plight, you're not being empathetic, you're not supporting the girlies."
Yes I am. What I am about to say is more empathetic and helpful to victims then you uncritically cropdusting the entire internet with allegations with your key citation being a fucking vibe check.
The reality is, any kind of recourse against a perpetrator is going to be profoundly taxing on the victim. All options kind of fucking suck. That is as horrible as it sounds, but that doesn't change that it's just fucking true.
Which means, what recourse is taken HAS TO BE a cost-benifit analysis.
What's the fucking goal? What is the best and worst outcome for any action taken to attempt to help the victim? What is the potential harm or benifit if information is withheld from the public if the alleged perpetrator is a public figure until things can be thoroughly teased out? What is absolutely nessesary to keep this victim safe, and stop any future harm for other potential victims?
All victims should be taken seriously. All victims should be heard out. All victims have the right to seek out support. That support could include but is not limited to: providing emotional support, getting them in contact for resources to get professional help, contacting the police, contacting an organization designed to help victims, and/or making the public aware of the allegations. In the order of escalation that makes the most sense.
I can tell you with absolute fucking certainty making a fucking tone deaf meme nightmare hell nuclear holocaust of a callout video that tosses in a "trust me bro" rape allegation an already mostly complete tea-sesh, and then telling the alleged victim to "go 2 da popo okie uwu? key bayyyyyyyyyy." Is the fucking opposite of supporting a victim. At BEST you are setting a victim up to get dicked over on two fronts, and at WORST, you're causing a witchhunt. You are adding to the fire of actual victims who aren't blessed with a sexual assault story that "plays well" to public perception. ESPECIALLY, if you have a very public petty vendetta against the accused. I am utterly gobsmacked, the degree of selfishness required to not realize how that fucking looks-- even if you believe the allegations are true.
I typically hold my tongue now in instances of of rape and sexual assault allegations until the dust has thoroughly settled. As a sexual assault survivor myself, I have a hard time uncoupling my own feelings and experiences from instances of this happening-- and it's just better for me to recuse myself from adding to the chorus until I have all possible available information-- and even then.
And if I'm being totally honest, I found out first about this video first as KP stealing an asset from me in the pettiest way she possibly could have, and it was something of a slow car-crash what the video was actually about.
Blessing in disguise she went out of her way not to credit me, it turns out. So no one could really realistically make the mistake I was involved or associated with this video. But, to be honest, it does sting a little. Even an inconsequential, stupid little asset being nabbed and used like that-- it doesn't feel good. I try to engage with this sort of thing on my own terms-- and that option was taken away from me because of KP's bullshit.
It's not really about me. But I would have probably waited to say something if I knew what the subject matter of the video was initially. Or maybe not, I'm not sure.
I'm not going to know now, the choice was taken from me. I wasn't expecting my stupid fucking Lily puppet LIKE THAT, you know?
I'm going to ask that this post not be taken as me making any sort of definitive judgement on the Saberspark allegations. I might say something when it seems all the information is out, I might not. If I feel like I have something of value to add I will, but I'm not Judge Liquid over here-- ultimate decider of guilt.
This post is directed at ILoveKimPossibleALot, Courtney Peet, Brony Fandont and anyone else I think deserved to take some of the blame for this clusterfuck.
I'll. . . Say this:
I have been for some amount of time been made privy of semi-private information that, though definitely proves nothing, implies some involved parties are, for SOME REASON, not willing to fully stand behind the legitimacy of the allegations when backed into a corner. I don't know if any of these parties have more information than has been made public, but it kind of seems like they MIGHT.
And that I have seen some red flags, that, in my VERY SUBJECTIVE interpretation of events, suggest that potentially KP in tentionally or otherwise, took advantage of a person very vulnerable to suggestion to massage a more substantial accusation out of a half-truth. That does happen. Especially with an alleged victim that is mentally ill, they can be pressured into exaggerating an event that emotionally affected them by creating a narrative that matches the intensity of their feelings.
That is ->NOT<- cause to doubt victims with mental illnesses. But that DOES mean victims need to be handled with care. That DOES mean it is natural human behavior to say what they have to socially protect ourselves. And if you, say, had an awkward personal interaction with an internet personality you developed a strong parasocial infatuation with as a child you never really properly processed. And, years later, when the memory was good and deep fried in your head, you were, say, directed to a youtuber who had all the ulterior motive in the world to press you into making it worth her while to give you the time of day. . .
Well.
Man, I love the Crystal Gems
Listen to amelia 🗣🔥
I feel silly today. So I did this.
Enjoy