vi.ardi art tag

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

#extradirty
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Origami Around

if i look back, i am lost

izzy's playlists!
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Sade Olutola
Stranger Things
YOU ARE THE REASON

Love Begins
hello vonnie

No title available
art blog(derogatory)
Game of Thrones Daily
official daine visual archive
Mike Driver
almost home
Not today Justin
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Türkiye
seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Hungary
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Germany
seen from Pakistan
seen from Türkiye
@viardevra
vi.ardi art tag
In a season about revenge and reconciliation, Lestat's revenge on Daniel is maybe the most complete. Daniel's work is the one thing in his life that he feels secure in – and that's something that Louis gave him in San Francisco, one of the only things Daniel does remember about what happened. When he's turned, and his daughters reject him again, and Armand runs off on him, and his book gets panned by the critics, Lestat offers him a life line of a documentary and Daniel accepts, because what else does he know how to do.
And he asks Lestat repeatedly 'why did you ask for me?', wondering if it's because Lestat wants Daniel's reputation and expertise in rehabilitating his image. But no. It's a lot simpler than that. Lestat wants to take the last thing Daniel has from him: his pride in his work.
So Lestat sets him up. He plays hard to get, not answering Daniel's questions, getting cranky, giving bits and pieces. And then he finally springs his trap and gives Daniel what he's been working towards – he breaks down and reveals something of himself – but it's all a fake out. Daniel has been taken in by an illusion inside his own head put there by a more powerful vampire who knew just how to push his buttons.
And then, as the coup de grace, Lestat casually and mockingly asks Daniel why it's never occurred to him that Armand has done the exact same thing to him with the interviews in Dubai. Armand is also a powerful vampire who can read people's minds and maybe it's just like when Daniel was taking pride in breaking Lestat down in front of his whole crew only to discover there's nothing there. It's completely devastating for Daniel. And for Lestat, destroying something in Daniel that Louis had given him must've been part of what he wanted from it.
@ekho-ekho-ekho tags:
#exaaaaaaactly#I've seen a lot of people wondering why Daniel struggled so much to interview Lestat effectively this season and like—#speaking from a similar profession: you'd be amazed how much the subject's willingness to engage can affect the process#Louis WANTED to talk about his past. Louis WANTED to unpack his memories. Louis WANTED a sounding-board.#likewise with Daniel's past interview subjects. even the evil ones did agree to talk to him—if only for the chance to spin their lies.#Lestat? Wanted a punching bag.#he didn't want to talk about the past or unpack his motives for the whole rock band lark. he wanted someone to bitch at.#(someone other than Louis. he can't bitch at Louis AND give him the silent treatment.)#so Daniel goes in with no real angle to interview someone who doesn't want to talk to him.#not about the past; not about the book; not even about his music.#which is ostensibly the point of the doc. and when we join them they've already been at it for the better part of what? two months?#hence why Daniel starts harping on the stutter thing. Stutters often begin with a childhood trauma.#Daniel knows if he's going to get at how Lestat became Lestat then a core trauma is a good place to start.#and it was. all that reflecting on the stutter led to him accepting that Gabriella was kind of always a monster in the finale.#(and no he didn't already have that epiphany in ep 6—he got close but a revelation like that? often comes in increments.)#(so it makes perfect sense for his anger to only kick in when he feels it on his childhood friend's behalf rather than his own.)
YUUUP – love this :)
@pastel-apostle's tags:
#love this take and the added tags!!#i completely agree lestat is angry at both louis and daniel for the book#and that anger manifests in different ways towards them both#such a good point about how daniel’s career is his lifeline#and we can see that really start to degrade this season#with daniel going from award winning journalist to clickbait youtuber#and how that lines up with the idea that vamps struggle to create meaningful art#louis interview is sooo different bc he really does WANT to be interviewed#imo any obfuscations or misdirections are genuine errors#louis knows his recollections are imperfect and he WANTS to remember#lestat knows his recollections are imperfect but has no interest in changing them#iwtv
Oh yes – you're so right! Daniel's career going from prestigious to trashy is so interesting. And there's a lot said about Lestat's music/stage persona being derivative in the show. What little we see about Daniel's new work suggests it's also derivative stuff – the tawdry little clickbait video, but also when he says they're shooting the stage shows in black and white and intercutting it with color interview. There may be some other reference there I'm not getting but it reminded me of U2's Rattle & Hum documentary arthouse movie, which documents their Joshua Tree US tour and recording of new songs in a mixture of B&W and color footage. It was generally panned by critics. So I wonder if this was a nod to that. But one way or another, it's an artsy choice that sounds immediately cliched.
And one of the big things that Daniel and Lestat have in common is that they both really really want to win accolades from the establishments in their fields. Lestat wants his album to be in the top 100 on Billboard. Daniel wants to take his documentary to Cannes.
That's why they can goad each other so successfully by pointing out crappy reviews – Lestat from the stage pointing out Vanity Fair trashing Daniel's book and Out Magazine calling it 'a steamy beach read', Daniel throwing up the Pitchfork review at Lestat. And they both compare themselves/resent the biggest names in their fields – Daniel bowling strikes calling out [Ronan] Farrow, [Glenn] Greenwald, Lestat being annoyed about Drake's 50 track drop. So Daniel knows exactly how to needle Lestat by pointing out Mitski's huge arena gig in contrast to his 1000 seater venue.
Because actually by what measure is Lestat's music career 'a failure'?
If, as he claims to Daniel, it's about pure self-expression, then why does it matter that he's bankrolling the whole thing and sometimes papering the house to get an audience? And if he's serious that the album should be produced for vampire ears only, then why does he care that it's not charting high enough on Billboard? Even in commercial terms, the band has only been going for three years and is playing 1000-2500 seater venues and probably selling enough merch and streams for them to be able to make a living – pretty rare these days for rock acts. Florence Welch asks them to open for her!
But none of this is enough for Lestat who has thousands of fans but wants billions. And ironically Daniel is probably the only one who fully understands that sort of megalomaniac ambition. But as he says in the bowling scene in the finale, Daniel grafted his way to the top of his profession, and he deeply resents Lestat's dilettante rich-kid queue-cutting. It'll be funny/terrible to see his reaction if it turns out next season that Armand was behind some of Daniel's career success too.
If it were me, I’d have Daniel regain control of his undead life and find his way back to real journalism through interviewing Armand and helping him make sense of his past. A willing subject instead of whatever Lestat was. They are able to put each other back together and figure out a way forward as companions. Explore Daniel and his vampirism through him exploring Armand and his. That’s just me though.
the issue I think for armand and daniel’s arc is because they decided to keep that dynamic hidden that also meant that to hide more of daniel’s journey through s3. as I’ve been doing a rewatch the hints of him not dealing with vampirism his life as failed journalist and his conflict are there up until episode 5 but the minute Armand enters the picture his conflict becomes another plot point that cannot be addressed. it is a double edged sword of letting lestat’s’ character study story moving forward before we get back to daniel and his dynamic with armand and how it is linked to his character.
also on a rewatch it is very clear that having only 7 episodes for this arc doesn’t work perfectly. the momentum is dropped short and while, again, lestat’s journey accepting his failure and knowing he loves is done so the story can move forward, a lot of many other parts or details literally had to be cut. now, I’m not saying having 8 episodes would have fixed everything but the pace of s3 in terms of character driven moment (and less about plot) was similar to s2 in a way. and the issue with the show now is that because it became way bigger (outside of louis’ recollection, many different locations and places), a 7 episode format (with each episode being around 45 minutes) doesn’t work anymore. you either give them 8 to 10 45 minutes episodes or you give them 7 episodes that are 55 minutes each.
s3 has a lot of good things, especially on a rewatch. a lot of pieces are really put cleverly in the narrative and the foreshadowing, with lots of different motifs echoing each other. it is truly lestat’s pov all the way through. but adapting qotd in 8 episodes means they will have to either cut things for s5, while also revisiting bits they didn’t show for s3. and considering the failures albums is part of the narrative, i hope the writers know exactly how they will structure that. if you tell me it’s a 2 acts story, you better make sure you can watch the two seasons and see it fully while also giving us enough bits for the rest for the story.
SDCC 2026
we're so lucky to have him play armand <'3
india is not a democracy anymore.
everyone needs to hear about the situation in india right now. the youth of this nation are going through hell and back to protect the foundations that our country was built on in the first place, while the adults who are supposed to actually be in charge try to silence our voices.
NEET, which is an exam taken by millions of students per year and is the ONLY gateway for medical admissions across the country, had its papers leaked. so many took their lives because this exam meant everything for their future. and NTA, the agency who conducts this exam, was not held accountable.
there was national backlash. cockroach janta party (initially a satirical political party formed by abhijeet dipke in retaliation to the remarks of the chief justice of india calling the youth "cockroaches" and "parasites of society") started protests at jantar mantar, demanding the resignation of the union education minister, dharmendra pradhan. the movement also asked for ten million inr (~100,000 usd) in compensation for the families of students who died by suicide and wanted NTA be held accountable.
sonam wangchuk, a climate activist and education reformer, also went on a hunger strike at jantar mantar to protest against this corruption in india's higher education system. his fast began on june 28, demanding the resignation of the union education minister. his fast lasted for 20 days until delhi police FORCIBLY removed him and admitted him to safdarjung hospital on july 18.
because of this, cockroach janta party announced "chalo sansad," a march to the parliament beginning on june 20th, 9:00 am ist. but the police seems to be responding with water cannons, mobile jammers, and baton charge. all of this, because of a peaceful protest led by people no older than 30.
and yet there has been absolutely no indian media coverage about a movement that spans the entirety of this nation. so, please, if you see this, keep talking about us. we will not let those old bastards stoop any lower than they've already had. we will not let them ruin our country any further. we will not be silenced
Please look it up. Students have been beaten bloody. They’re using electrified batons. They’re using batons with nails hammered in. They’re dragging people off and locking them up for no reason. People are being beaten, assaulted, and even molested by the police.
The government is doing everything it can except for actually having an honest dialogue with the protestors.
It’s important to note that despite all the police brutality, despite how the government has had extra forces airlifted to Delhi to help quash the protest, this has deterred no one.
Not only is the protest in Delhi going strong, the government closed down every metro station in Central Delhi in an effort to stop them and it still hasn’t.
There’s protests in most major cities in India in solidarity. Palakkad, Chennai, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Kochi, and probably more besides. There has been a protest in the UK as well in solidarity.
People who aren’t at the protest are donating so much food that the organisers have had to ask them to stop doing so because there’s more than enough. In lieu of that people are donating money for medicine, lawyers, cleanup, and umbrellas.
Most crucially, hopes aren’t broken. Spirits aren’t broken. People with bruises and broken bones are still showing up. People are showing up cosplaying as freedom fighters and super heroes and a dinosaur. People are doxxing goons who show up trying to incite violence. People are making reels. People in Mumbai literally opened a moving police detainment van to allow arrested students to escape.
*all links lead to Instagram posts or reels showing the same. Almost every major Indian news network has been bought and either ignores the protests or depicts them unfairly. All honest news comes from people on the ground and smaller independent news outlets.
My Vampire Lestat Review: Stopping Before the Nosedive
As a Daniel enjoyer, can I just say, the racism is the point. The ableism is the point, the bag on her head as she cried, the student used aggressively, the estranged daughters. This is a boomer monster. Remember how he lectured Lestat's head on having carved out a path for himself? That's boomer talk. You dislike him by design, because he is a bad person and I'd never seen a so thoroughly boomer evil on tv, it's very interesting and timely, you just gotta understand that it's not a blind spot in the writing, it's intentional. Just like it's intentional that Armand torture Louis, and the shockingly evil ugliness of that. The ugliness of incest, of murder, nothing is sanitized.
They're wealthy predators, the discomfort is the point.
Okay, but they forgot the love.
That's what irks me, about so many of the monstrous characterizations, this season. They feel flat, not because I'm offended or uncomfortable, or can't handle friction in storytelling, it's because they forgot to add in the love.
Yes, this season is about loneliness and failure. It is about monsters lashing out because being lonely turns you into a worse version of yourself. But part of what makes a COMPELLING monster narrative, is showing the love.
We got the love in the first two seasons. You felt Louis loving Lestat. You felt Louis loving Claudia and her loving him back, as twisted and bitter as it was at times. You felt Loumand love each other, as twisted and empty as it was at times. You even felt Daniel and Louis weave in and out of each other, and care about each other, as they mocked each other.
Where is the love? Where is the personality? "Asshole" as a personality trait is fine, as long as it has something to love. I loved his snark, yeah, but what else was there? In season 1, Daniel tells us how he loved that Alice had a blonde eyebrow, and he was disappointed she dyed it back. He called her a "mutt" which IS an insult, but he said it with love. THAT'S what I wanted to see. THAT'S what I come to this series and the characters for.
When I say "that's not Daniel," it's not that he wouldn't say abrasive, fucked up, inflammatory, microaggressive comments. That's in character. What isn't in character is that he feels dumbed down by the narrative to make it work. What isn't in character is that he doesn't say anything with fucked-up fondness. What isn't in character is that Daniel has nothing going on in his life but bowling and the documentary. Where is his addiction? Where did his health problems go? Why is the Talamasca SO involved in his life, to the point he'd ruin a date with Louis for them? He seemingly was friendly with Dee, but is never seen talking to them again after episode 1.
It just doesn't feel like he was written with love. That's what's missing.
@the-vampire-library EXACTLY
Where is my journalist-turned-vampire? Where is the guy who lives on other people's stories? Why don't we see him trying to get into people's heads, why doesn't he know all the hot gossip in the band?
If you're gonna make a journalist a vampire, actually do something with it. He could have been a key to breaking down Lestat's unreliable narrative, but instead they just set him up to go bowling with Lestat's head and didn't even commit to THAT.
Armand really did have everything on display this episode. Sliding in and out of accents admitting a complete lack of stable identity, how he spoke to Regina as a fellow sex worker even after centuries. The way his voice broke, repeating someone else’s account of his trauma because he could not do it for himself, because he can only believe in himself reflected by other people.
The petty, immature little jabs in his “Armends.” Imposing his will onto others in truly frightening ways. Forcing Louis to validate his pain in the most sadistic way possible. The inability to internalize that his rage is not at Louis but an injustice too big for him to name.
I wanted to rush across the room and hold him. I wanted to run away from him screaming. I wish we got more of Armand this season but goddamn, Assad Zaman killed it in every scene. Bravo.
learning that AMC cancelled the akasha final concert scene mid-production explains a lot about the tvl finale
claudia x the hand
this isn’t rage; it’s too specific
[A country road. A tree.]
VLADIMIR: what do they say? ESTRAGON: they talk about their lives. VLADIMIR: to have lived is not enough for them. ESTRAGON: they have to talk about it.
i do graphics for our student activism group pretty often and now everyone thinks i have actual graphic design knowledge meanwhile i usually just frankenstein together everything i make with a unholy combination of canva and clip studio paint v1
[TAPE RECORDER CLICKS.]
DANIEL: okay, it's on now. uh... first question — you weren't always a vampire, were you?
Now that everyone is discussing Nolan's Odyssey movie, I feel like it's a good time to let non-Italians know that the production dumped plastic props into the Italian sea. Weirdly enough I could not find any article in English about it but it's a fucking problem nonetheless.
I might translate this article later today. This one was the most complete one, even in Italian news it's not talked about that much.
Non è la prima volta che la produzione solleva un vespaio in Sicilia. A Lipari una squadra di sub sarebbe però già impegnata a bonificare i