Idk. @whatkennylikes - Tumblr Blog

Posts

twitblr

Dormant Predators

cypresscapers

loueejii

This is why I have this. Even if they can get the lock opened they can’t push the door open. Got it at Lowes for $20.

ocean-again

reblog for that last bit to save a life

smiling-grouch-deactivated20241

If you’re like me and have a large gap under your front door (someone could take a stick and just poke the leaning stick style door jam out), I recommend the Addalock. It’s small, perfect for traveling, and this lock is CRAZY. It’s so simple but the door does not move.

You can’t see it from the other side, either. It also cost about $20, and I can’t recommend it enough. Easy to travel with, too! Great for Air BnBs!

deminat-20

That’s why I have these on my doors. They get drilled into the side and once its flipped over the door nothing is getting it open. Not the door being unlocked nothing, I’ve unlocked the door and pulled and pushed as hard as I could and it didn’t budge. When I go on a trip this is what I use and when I’m home I leave it on too. No one is getting in here.

letsgetoutofspace

Okay I know that it is necessary for many but what do you do if you need medical attention and you’re not able to open the door from the inside? Can the fire department get through these at least?

morgrimmoon

Yes. The fire department can and will break down your door if necessary, it’s one of the reasons they have axes; it’s entirely possible for door frames to melt/expand/seize or otherwise become unopenable during a house fire but the door itself can be hacked down. Or the window. In rare cases, the wall. Firefighters don’t fuck around with collateral damage when lives are at stake.

trini-lover

Sharing for all the safety items!!

inner

Informative. Please share!

whatkennylikes

Guys, all they have to do is break your window. Stay strapped...legally, and protect you and yours.

catchymemes

reblog-house

I legit was like “how fucking tall and strong is the person in the alien disguise”

#funny

tuttii-fruttii-deactivated20200

#dope #music

catchymemes

steeiydan

no but let me add the context here!

these are two pretty well known german tv personalities

palina, the woman on the left here, gets a lot of really gross comments on her body, especially her boobs. stuff like (paraphrased cause they’re in german) “woah, i wanna cum all over those fat tits” or “she’s such a fucking hot slut i wanna fuck those tits” or “with her, half of the guys would cum before reaching her hole” and who can forget “palina, you are and always will be a juicy piece of meat i would drink out of”. and the media tends to really sexualize her too.

so she and klaas (dude on the right), with the help of their team and and lovely ass-model decided to just drop this picture as an instagram, with the caption “finally got that nice necklace with my zodiac”

the media was quick to pick it up as “ah she says its about the necklace but she wants to show her boobs!”, and of course there were more comments like “i jacked off to this like seven times in an hour” and “those tits should milk my cock dry”

like a week later, they dropped the making-off video to that video and the rest is history

bogleech

oh my god

pedanticbohemian-deactivated202

Further proof of the fact that men are trash.

whatkennylikes

You are trash as well

kingjaffejoffer

I feel like men are the only ones who can date “out of their league”. Like if you’re an average looking dude and a beautiful-modelesque looking women decides to date you, it’s like low-key whatever, but I’ve never seen the roles reversed. Average looking women almost rarely, if ever, even get looked at by the modelesque looking guy. It’s not possible. This is like one of those rare times where being a man in the double standard is a good thing lol.

Jessie Williams and his ex wife qualify for this.

whatkennylikes

I feel like men usually won’t put money over attraction because we don’t usually look at women to provide for us financially. Many women on the other hand will, and that’s a fact. They will look past physical attraction if the money is right. No matter how ugly a rich man looks, he will be able to pull him a bad gold digger, or several. Let’s see who tries to argue against this basic concept. And no I’m not calling all women gold diggers. But then you have in-shape/modelesque men who are chubby chasers, and some would argue that those women are out of that man’s league, when really they’re right in it. Who are we to say who is out of someone’s league. People are attracted to different things.

tariqah

If you are an older sister you are entitled to a financial compensation. If you’re an older brother fuck u

fuckyeahdevanand

If you’re an older brother thank you for blessing me with wisdom and noogies and ignore this misandrist post.

whatkennylikes

kingjaffejoffer

Nick Cannon: “No woman who’s with me has to work”

What do y’all think about this?

ohnosbros

I really hate this interviewer and his comments about women. You can really tell he’s not the type of person who even has the means to take care of the woman he’s with yet you can tell having a woman taking advantage of him financially is his biggest fear.

Let Nick Cannon do whatever he wants with his money. He clearly sounds like he knows the role money plays in his life and how he wants to use it. Shut the fuck up about women wanting and going after men who are willing and able to take care of them financially. Stop shaming women for knowing what they want and accepting nothing less. DO NOT shame women for wanting to be a housewife. Men like that interviewer love and prefer for women to suffer relationships with men who have never achieved anything and cant do anything for them, not even support their dreams, than to be with someone accomplished and wants to care for her the way she wants to be cared for and to support her in that. I feel secondhand embarrassment for nick for having gotten an interviewer like that because he clearly doesnt understand this type of relationship dynamic and Nick’s discomfort is visible. I applaud nick cannon. More men should be like him. More black women should be spoiled and have someone that will enable them to have the housewife dream if that’s what they want AND TO SUPPORT THAT DREAM. So many black women didnt and still dont have the housewife dream available to them and I’m not ok with that. nick is not saying she WILL NOT work, just that she won’t have to if she doesn’t want to. Nick cannon wants that option available to the woman hes with. As should any man. You shouldnt be shaming women who want men who are able to offer them something compatible with their needs.

The interviewer should stay off the topic of women and money because he clearly cant discuss either topic knowledgeably or with competence.

That interviewer was disgusting in every way and nick was such a sweetheart who takes pride knowing he can provide his wife and kids with everything they want and supports his wife’s dreams. Nick cannon is the kind of men we should all be pursuing in 2019 and beyond. I stan. I hard stan.

in case yall didnt get the memo, were not shaming gold diggers anymore in 2019 and beyond.

whatkennylikes

Uh, the interviewer, DJ Vlad, is a millionaire former computer programmer, turned company owner, turned music producer, turned director and tv producer and now owns a successful YouTube channel where he regularly interviews celebrities. I’m sure he has the means to take care of a woman and children just fine.

Now with that out of the way, you were talking out of your ass in your whole post (well the first and last couple paragraphs that I chose to read and what I skimmed from the long paragraph). He didn’t shame women. He was asking questions, which led to the answers that you’re so happy with Nick for giving. Nick enjoyed his questions. Vlad asks provocative questions that get people talking and these questions weren’t even really provocative. They were valid questions. He didn’t even give his view of whether it’s a bad thing or not to provide for a woman and you don’t even know if he provides for a woman or not. You went on an ignorant tirade for no reason and assumed so much that wasn’t even there. Also, when he said women would poke holes in the condom, that was a way of jokingly saying many women will find what Nick is saying to be a breath of fresh air and want to tie him down because many successful men don’t openly admit to doing what Nick said he does, even though this is what they do. It’s similar to when people say that a guy will not pull out and purposely get a woman pregnant or she has great qualities. That’s not shaming. And if you think he was shaming women when he said that women will not go backwards financially, well, Nick agreed with him there. Pretty much I think he’s saying that if the finances go sour, the woman is leaving since that’s probably the deciding factor for her being with a man of wealth. That’s a relationship based off primarily material and not the actual person. And now, when that woman can’t find another baller, she will never be happy with a man with less than her ex, or she will be lonely. Or she might go into a relationship where the man controls her just because he is her sole economic provider because she doesn’t want to not have the material access that she was used to before or that she desires. I hear women say all the time, when a man is the main provider or the only provider, he gets controlling, and when she brings the bacon or as much money, he can’t do that. But hey, men can’t speak on women right? Haha give me a break.

I have zero problems with stay-at-home moms. If that’s what works best for the family, then so be it. It’s actually ideal in many situations. Why do I get the feeling that if it were a female interviewer interviewing a woman saying her man doesn’t have to work, if she asked all the same questions I highly doubt you would go on this type of tirade, even though men who are provided for solely by their women are shamed much worse than the other way around. It’s much more acceptable to be a stay-at-home mom, or a woman that doesn’t work and isn’t the bread winner, than to be a stay-at-home dad, or be a man that doesn’t work or isn’t the bread winner. You said all men should have the option available to the woman he’s with not to work if she doesn’t want to. Do you also feel every woman should have to option available for her man not to work if he doesn’t want to? If a woman can require than her man works and offers a certain lifestyle to her, why should a man not be able to require than his woman works if he’s going to be with her? This is a two way street you know, and you’re shaming men who don’t want their women to be stay-at-home women/moms.