HELLO INTERNET AND WELCOME TO [wickjump]: REDUX ...again
My name is Wick (she/they/star/it), also known as Wickskip (TikTok), Wickjump (Tumblr), or Hopwick (AO3*).
On all platforms my content centers around Undertale and the Undertale Multiverse, however I’ll also sometimes reblog/post about a few other fandoms.
PROSHIP DNI.
What I post and reblog can contain themes of violence/abuse, mental illness, whump/grimdark/dead dove/fictional gore, suicide/self harm, suggestive themes, and more. For those reasons, this blog is intended for audiences 16+ in age. I write and enjoy grimdark content, keep that in mind.
Reblogs that may contain these themes often go untagged!
🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️ TRANS CROSS CANON 🩵🩷🤍🩷🩵
information zone /ᐠ - ˕-マ｡˚ᶻ 𝗓
[⁉️] byf/dni:
dni: pro/com/dark (i do not support harassment or doxxing), xvials, TERFs, zionists/pro-isreal, anti-semitics, bigots. aka obvious assholes
byf: i will sometimes post/reblog things of a suggestive nature, but none of said posts will be graphic nudity. nsfw content may be discussed, but not in detail. i will also post whump content which can include gore, torture, conditioning, dehumanization, etc.
i will occasionally talk about or reference my experience in being groomed, abused, formerly proship (and now against it), a victim of csa, or other traumas of mine, but posts containing those themes will always be tagged appropriately. i use 'cw' instead of 'tw' when tagging warnings!
to not see my whump posts, filter out the tags #evil wick hours (for general whump posts/reblogs) and #evil wick writes (for more graphic/explicit whump or writing snippets)
*my ao3 account is not intended for those under 18.
yes nsfw/18+ blogs can follow me i really dont care given i have one of my own
[⚠️] boundaries:
do not tag me in posts containing themes that apply to my dnis or general discomforts. that includes grooming, pedophilia, incest, proship content, bigotry, etc.
do not tag me in posts that are centered around the harassment of another individual or group of individuals.
don’t flirt with me or make sexual/romantic comments towards me, regardless of age or relationship status, including jokes!!!! conversations with graphic sexual themes are generally uncomfortable for me and i’d prefer not to have them. conversations about sex or sexual themes is fine as long as you’re 18+ and not being weird towards me (or in general) about it.
don’t drag me into fights/start them under my posts!!!!!!! id like to be informed of the base of what’s going on, but not included.
sometimes i can be wrong about things. if i am wrong about things, tell me so i can improve!! i never mean to make anyone upset because of something i said. on this note, also send an ask or dm if i reblog or mistakenly support a not-good person, it would be much appreciated!
aint a boundary but itd be appreciated if you didn’t use starself, only star/star's. not for any important reason it’s just a grammar pet peeve of mine
color, animal, movie, book: pink/red, cats/wolves/foxes, the little prince (1974)/the lion king, the forgotten warrior (wc)
coffee order: >60k word slow burn friends to lovers whump recovery fic rated M PLEASE
[🕯] other assorted info:
still no twitter, discord, or insta :(
cross is my liege and he is the focus of 90% of my posts. i also gore/whump him the most
i don’t have kids, but i have cats. two of them. but they might as well be my biological kids with how they act. i post about them like theyre human biological children and often dont clarify it's a joke in the tags. please get used to this
every time i talk about ink in a relationship it is always queerplatonic on their part, even if i don’t clarify!! i personally don’t ship them romantically.
i have diagnosed autism, adhd, anxiety, ptsd, and some others but that’s my personal biz. if i come off as awkward, ‘trying too hard’, unable to realize when a joke’s ended, or just weird/unlikable, that’s why. i’m seriously bad with that stuff but i’m trying my best!! don't be mean to me i'll cry
i’m a cupioromantic acespec lesbian (i love women) and non-binary :3
mapleshade chara and toriel #1 defender
[🐇] links to thingz:
Undertrap Sans/Milkbone Sans <- my son
Sona Reference Sheet <- me
Strawpage (carrd but cooler + u can submit drawings?!??!?!?!)
Ao3 / TikTok
18+ Sideblog <- pretty inactive mb
(pride divider by aquazero, cross stamps by lazyartost, error/dream/cross & warrior cats dividers by sister-lucifer, undertale graphics by e-resources, no clue who made the eeveelutions one lol)
the thing is toriel is not and never was shaped like that. like yes she's a milf but she's also flat as a board and you need to appreciate her as she is.
the thing is toriel is not and never was shaped like that. like yes she's a milf but she's also flat as a board and you need to appreciate her as she is.
[ID: a Simpson's character gesturing towards a sign that reads, "Don't Forget: Asperger was a eugenicist Nazi that sent autistic children to their deaths." End of ID]
It's okay if you didn't know! We're a severely misrepresented community and many autistic people themselves are uninformed about a lot of things about our own community.
It's just really important to be receptive about things that our fellow autistics say are harmful towards autistic people. Please listen.
DNI if you still use/defend the term Asperger's. It's okay if you didn't know until you saw this post, but please stop using it. Just say autism. It's not a bad word.
When they first folded Asperger’s into the definition of autism, I felt very weird about it, because I felt like, do I have the right to use that term when I’m for all effective purposes not disabled by it? I did very well in school and I fake being NT fairly well.
But as I thought about it more I realized, that’s internalized ableism talking. On some subconscious level I was buying into the whole low-functioning/high-functioning kind of split, and thinking, oh, but I’m not one of those. Which is wrong. You don’t get to be a special kind of autistic just because you can fake being NT. That’s why we’re described as a spectrum.
Also, over time I realized... I am disabled. I had the energy to compensate for it when I was younger, but as I got older and more tired, my autistic traits have interfered more and more with my ability to get my work done. And it makes it harder for me to be a parent, or a spouse, or a friend. I am incredibly lonely because my spoons for dealing with humans are overconsumed by my family, and I want to have friends but I don’t have the energy to make or keep them.
Asperger’s was a term that allowed autistics like me, who the world treats as “almost normal!”, to think of ourselves as better than other autistics who are less verbal or less adept at masking. And that’s wrong. Autistics should have solidarity with other autistics, not be encouraged to think of ourselves as fundamentally different just because we had no speech delays and/or did well in school. I may have been talking at 5 months but when I’m tired I speak in grunts and hand gestures. I have samefoods and texture issues and touch sensitivities; I can’t wear a lanyard or a watch. Anything around my neck makes me feel like I’m carrying an incredible weight there and anything around my wrist feels like my circulation’s being cut off, even though these things cannot be objectively true. I probably have more in common with a non-verbal autistic person than someone who’s completely NT.
So, even if it hadn’t been created by a Nazi, which it was, and even if it hadn’t been created to separate “useful” autistics who can contribute to society by making good money for some employer vs those of us who will end up on disability, which it was, it’s still a bad term. it divides our community, and we are small enough, under enough threat, and have such a hard time holding any kind of leadership position in the NT world to protect ourselves, that we need to be unified.
I’m not gonna try to go back in time and edit old posts of mine on social media platforms where I called myself an Aspie, but for some years now I have embraced the term “autistic” even before I knew Asperger was a Nazi. I don’t always believe in throwing out useful things just because a reprehensible person made them; I won’t delete a reblog of a cute kitten because a TERF posted that kitten, for example. But in this case, Aspergers’ is the opposite of useful. The fact that it was created by a Nazi is actually less important than that it was created as part of Nazi ideology, where disabled people don’t have the right to live unless we’re useful. Hans Asperger divided autistic people into those who could serve the Third Reich and those who couldn’t, and sent those of us who couldn’t to die. That’s why the term exists. So don’t use it.
[Picture is a reaction image showing Mr. Burns from the Simpsons putting up a sign saying, “Don’t Forget: Asperger was a eugenicist nazi that sent autistic children to their deaths.”
End ID.]
I will never tell people to stop using a term to describe themselves. Labels can be incredibly meaningful.
[ID: a Simpson's character gesturing towards a sign that reads, "Don't Forget: Asperger was a eugenicist Nazi that sent autistic children to their deaths." End of ID]
It's okay if you didn't know! We're a severely misrepresented community and many autistic people themselves are uninformed about a lot of things about our own community.
It's just really important to be receptive about things that our fellow autistics say are harmful towards autistic people. Please listen.
DNI if you still use/defend the term Asperger's. It's okay if you didn't know until you saw this post, but please stop using it. Just say autism. It's not a bad word.
When they first folded Asperger’s into the definition of autism, I felt very weird about it, because I felt like, do I have the right to use that term when I’m for all effective purposes not disabled by it? I did very well in school and I fake being NT fairly well.
But as I thought about it more I realized, that’s internalized ableism talking. On some subconscious level I was buying into the whole low-functioning/high-functioning kind of split, and thinking, oh, but I’m not one of those. Which is wrong. You don’t get to be a special kind of autistic just because you can fake being NT. That’s why we’re described as a spectrum.
Also, over time I realized... I am disabled. I had the energy to compensate for it when I was younger, but as I got older and more tired, my autistic traits have interfered more and more with my ability to get my work done. And it makes it harder for me to be a parent, or a spouse, or a friend. I am incredibly lonely because my spoons for dealing with humans are overconsumed by my family, and I want to have friends but I don’t have the energy to make or keep them.
Asperger’s was a term that allowed autistics like me, who the world treats as “almost normal!”, to think of ourselves as better than other autistics who are less verbal or less adept at masking. And that’s wrong. Autistics should have solidarity with other autistics, not be encouraged to think of ourselves as fundamentally different just because we had no speech delays and/or did well in school. I may have been talking at 5 months but when I’m tired I speak in grunts and hand gestures. I have samefoods and texture issues and touch sensitivities; I can’t wear a lanyard or a watch. Anything around my neck makes me feel like I’m carrying an incredible weight there and anything around my wrist feels like my circulation’s being cut off, even though these things cannot be objectively true. I probably have more in common with a non-verbal autistic person than someone who’s completely NT.
So, even if it hadn’t been created by a Nazi, which it was, and even if it hadn’t been created to separate “useful” autistics who can contribute to society by making good money for some employer vs those of us who will end up on disability, which it was, it’s still a bad term. it divides our community, and we are small enough, under enough threat, and have such a hard time holding any kind of leadership position in the NT world to protect ourselves, that we need to be unified.
I’m not gonna try to go back in time and edit old posts of mine on social media platforms where I called myself an Aspie, but for some years now I have embraced the term “autistic” even before I knew Asperger was a Nazi. I don’t always believe in throwing out useful things just because a reprehensible person made them; I won’t delete a reblog of a cute kitten because a TERF posted that kitten, for example. But in this case, Aspergers’ is the opposite of useful. The fact that it was created by a Nazi is actually less important than that it was created as part of Nazi ideology, where disabled people don’t have the right to live unless we’re useful. Hans Asperger divided autistic people into those who could serve the Third Reich and those who couldn’t, and sent those of us who couldn’t to die. That’s why the term exists. So don’t use it.
[Picture is a reaction image showing Mr. Burns from the Simpsons putting up a sign saying, “Don’t Forget: Asperger was a eugenicist nazi that sent autistic children to their deaths.”
End ID.]
I will never tell people to stop using a term to describe themselves. Labels can be incredibly meaningful.
