that’s an interesting marketing strategy
I summon Blue Eyes Hairy Chest in attack position

izzy's playlists!

roma★
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON

shark vs the universe

Discoholic 🪩
h

Origami Around
tumblr dot com
Today's Document
🪼
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Monterey Bay Aquarium

⁂
d e v o n
No title available
sheepfilms

No title available
i don't do bad sauce passes

oozey mess

seen from Peru
seen from Spain
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
@wispowillow
that’s an interesting marketing strategy
I summon Blue Eyes Hairy Chest in attack position
funky dancer
hold me closer,,,,, tiny dancer 🕺
yes babe your final form is so horrifying and uninterpretable by mortal eyes <3
The Riverchase Galleria circa late 1980s. I can slightly recall bombin’ around the mall when it looked like this. Ah, if only I could have appreciated the splendor back then. It looked like a vaporwave dreamscape.
Fountain_of_Youth.jpg
By: @Oracle_del_amo (insta)
This is the funniest explanation for Boney M. anyone could ever have given, lmao.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/28/us/utah-monolith-disappears-trnd/index.html
The Bureau of Land Management be like:
Have this very quickly and very shoddily put together edit
#baby grogu
You're strong. Your undead minions are plentiful and loyal. The skulls motif in your tower is not "tacky". Your enemies are afraid of you. You don't need the approval of the living.
Lmao you’re an adult, you shouldn’t be using the word squick. Use trigger. Use your grown up adult words to explain how you feel instead of leaning on a cutesy uwu term that no one outside of tumblr uses. It’s embarrassing.
Idek if this is serious or ironic honestly
#like…why use this baby word when you can just say how you feel about it
Found this in the original post tags and I just… SIGH
Here’s the thing, anon. Squick isn’t just ‘I don’t like this’, it’s ‘I think this is gross and it makes me deeply uncomfortable but I pass no judgement on those who enjoy it, because I acknowledge that everyone is different and those same people may have the same visceral reaction some of the things I enjoy’ and was originally made popular in the kink community.
So yeah, if you want to say that every time you come across a trope or whatever you find icky then go ahead, say that every time.
Also, this term dates back to Usenet in the early nineties, so sure, go off.
This frustrates me so much because squicks and triggers are fundamentally different things and as someone with PTSD, the distinction is super useful!
Squicks are things I find personally gross but may not be gross to someone else. They don’t upset me or provoke my PTSD, they simply do not pop my corn. Example: Omegaverse. I don’t like it, it makes me uncomfortable and I’m not going to read it, but if you like it, you do you.
Triggers are things which directly provoke my PTSD. This means that my triggers may seem completely normal and innocuous to someone else, because my triggers are so personal and intrinsically linked to a specific event in my life. My reactions to these triggers can include panic attacks and flashbacks to this traumatic event. Sometimes being triggered can affect me for several hours or even days.
Describing something as either a squick or a trigger allows me easily establish the difference in my potential reaction to something without having to go into painful detail about why bodily fluids might make me back button quickly but poker games might leave me a crying wreck.
Making this distinction, and having a specific word for something that is not your slice of pie, but also not an actual psychological trigger, is also REALLY important for making sure that the word “trigger” can retain its original, specific, purposeful, and collectively understood clinical meaning (both inside and outside online fannish communities).
If we encourage everyone to lump things that just make them slightly uncomfortable or simply aren’t to their taste in under the word “trigger”, it actually dilutes the meaning of the word. It makes it harder for us all to, for the most part, collectively agree on and understand what exactly is being described when the word gets used.
And that destruction of shared precise definitions is a problem! It is really useful to have the communal language to be able to clearly and quickly delineate between “this grosses me out, no thanks” and “this is going to set off a trauma episode, rattle my brain, and probably throw off the rest of my day/week as a result” while also maintaining your privacy, and to know that you will be understood in what you are saying. Not having it is actually detrimental to the effort of making our communities safe and navigable for people living with trauma. Which is a goal that is much more important to me, personally, than the idea of not being “cutesy” (a word which in this case which sounds a lot like it’s being used as a euphemism for “cringe”).
(Also, one has to wonder if people told Shakespeare he was being childish when he made up entirely new words that are still widely used in the English language today…… 🤔)
The above many reasons for my pet peeve - using tw: <content> or calling tags for ‘trigger warnings’.
As explained above, triggers have a clinical definition, and on top of this as a content creator, I have no idea what is triggering to someone. Calling something a trigger warning assumes something about what triggers people, but that make no sense.
Call them content warning, or content tags (my preferred, as this assumes less - one person’s warnings is another’s favorite).
Coming back to triggers, because they are highly specific and serious, as a fanfic writer I am ALWAYS willing to reply to asks if my works contain a trigger for you, and I will NEVER judge you for your triggers, I will NEVER ask you to justify them.
Does your story <Y> contain <X>? is a perfectly valid question to all authors, especially when it’s not something commonly tagged.
girl you must be a member of the addams family cause that pussy be Festering
hey just got back from 5 years in the future after this post caused a civil war
Me when I’m rosé drunk and I feel fancy and also drama
are you taking part in no nut november
In this current climate?! Are you fucking insane? The dopamine i’m receiving from ringing the devils doorbell is the only thing stopping my mental health from collapsing into itself like the house at the end of the film Poltergeist. Let’s not be silly, anon.
I honestly don’t know how to tell you these shocking facts but fucked up things in stories were not invented by AO3
I literally saw that someone replied to a post that talked about content in public libraries saying that that content should be regulated as well and Im just like when your statement can’t be distinguished from something a Southern Baptist pastor would say you really need to take a hard look at what kind of belief system you’ve let yourself fall into.