I’m not a kiddo, I’m probably older than most of you. In fact, I know I’m older than most of you. I didn’t bring more facts because I wasn’t trying to argue. I was trying to suggest why Beemoov was using the same character in both games. It was a response to the tags and facebook before it was a “theory”. I clearly stated it before anyone reblogged the post. It was not me trying to be factual.
Here’s some facts for you kiddos:
1. You all talked about complementary colors for weeks, but never mentioned Erika and Candy. Not to mention eyes and appearances could have changed after being transported into a new world.
2. Beemoov never specified what degree Erika had, only that she was a recent graduate trying to enter the workforce. Her father’s job was also never specified. Also, the “pressuring” (which I never read) could have been because she didn’t get a job right away. It was also implied she needed work experience before she was about to work for her father.
3. The background given on Erika is basic, any story can be created from it due to minimal information. Their personalities are almost identical.
4. MCL’s illustrations are customizable. Eldarya’s are not. There is a possiblity looks have nothing to do with the character, but were instead created to build a character that had no true distinguishable properties. That way, the game could create illustrations that fit everyone, by fitting no one.
5. If Erika were to look like anyone from MCL the players would automatically build the theory from the first episode. They may have presented this character as someone that cannot be tied to any game so it wouldn’t spoil their plans.
6. Not all surfers have tattoos, that’s a stereotype. We only have one real reference to past friends and relationships. Eldarya rarely has dialogues about events on earth. We don’t even have names for family or friends.
7. The appearance of Eldarya characters at the mall or on merchandise could be a publicity stunt to gain traffic on Eldarya. It means nothing when it comes to Beemoov because they’ve always done this.
8. The necromancer was introduced on MCL without any information. (Which is what my original post was about). She isn’t evil yet, which means MCL takes place before or after Eldarya. Either before, because obviously the necromancer isn’t evil yet, or after if Erika and friends “save her”.
9. Yes it was rude because “but it’s fun to theorize” is a condescending statement. As is the statement “good to have a headcanon”. I never stated it was a theory or a head canon, I said it might be interesting. It was toward those questioning Beemoovs decision.
10. I also said this could be the necromancers back story. I never said I know for sure this is what was happening. I even edited my post, which you’ve all reblogged saying I just thought it would be interesting. That was it.
This is a game, not my life. But to each its own. I never once said I had a theory, I was suggesting ways the necromancer might be incorporated into either game.
I’ve played Beemoov games since 2012. I have also written about that several times. That’s how you find out what someone nows. Which is what I would have done. I also never brought Moonlight Lovers into any of this. I don’t play that game.
Yes, a reply is fine. As others have. I don’t need an essay on facts disputing my small paragraph post on why Beemoov might be using a character from Eldarya. If my post weren’t filled with “could, might, and maybe” I would understand why people would respond trying to explain their side. But it’s from a confessions blog, not a real persons blog.
Don’t call me a kiddo, sweetie.