Ang aga-aga may nakikita akong Marcos apologist sa dashboard. I'd like to respond to him directly, pero ayoko na kasing magkaroon pa ng traction 'yung misinformed opinion niya.
So, I'm making a new post altogether. Kulayan ko na rin at i-bold 'yung ibang parts para maganda rin sa mata. ๐
Kasi una sa lahat, hindi maitatago ng literal na colorful words niyo 'yung part na ipinagtatanggol niyo ang pamilya ng mga magnanakaw.
Pero para maiwasan ang mahulog sa misinformation, please take time to watch Batas Militar on YouTube. It's free, it's informative, and basically answers most of the questions and clarifies wrong impressions on Martial Law.
Bakit idineklara ang Martial Law?
Papano ito humantong sa ganung sitwasyon?
Anong mga magagandang bagay at paglabag sa batas ang mga nangyari noon?
I swear, hindi sayang ang oras niyo rito. Watch it HERE!
And then ask yourselves: "Bakit ba ako nasasaktan na may iilang hecklers ni Sandro Marcos, pero hindi ako nasasaktan para sa mga taong naging biktima ng batas militar?"
Ito rin, itanong niyo sa sarili niyo: "Bakit ako nagagalit na nabastos si Sandro, pero hindi ako nagagalit para sa kapwa Pilipino kong nanakawan at ibinaon sa utang?"
Ito pa: "Bakit ang response ko lang sa mga kasalanan ng mga Marcos ay 'to accept and to prayers sa mga family mo at mga biktima,' pero gumawa ako ng dedicated rant sa mga bumatikos kay Sandro Marcos?"
You can't repetitively talk about human ethics, say you're pro-country and then defend a family of murderers and thieves. Make it make sense, dude.
On more thing, stop hiding in the guise of "neutrality" maipagtanggol niyo lang ang pamilya ng mga magnanakaw at mamamatay tao.
Wala pong gitna rito, either you're against them or you're enabling them. Make a stand.
โand no pressure, but make it fast. Kasi may garapal na nais bumalik sa kapangyarihan and we cannot allow that to happen.
So ayunโnow let's talk about the arguments that he raised.
1. "Hindi pa ipinanganak noong Martial Law."
I don't think anyone in this platform lived during that time naman. But historical accounts exist, and you cannot discount them with the argument na "victors write history."
Why? Because history can be revisited, history can be revised, history is only relatively true until new facts come up.
The thing is, lahat kasi ng mga lumalabas tungkol sa mga Marcoses only support the fact that atrocities were committed against the country. One of the most recent ones that I've heard of is this:
Imelda Marcos convicted of graft, sentenced to prison
Kung hindi ka naniniwala sa first-hand accounts ng mga biktima, sa mga history books, documentaries, and news archives back in the day โ then tell us kung saan at kanino galing ang information para hindi ka tinatawag na misinformed.
2. "Gitna ako. May mali mga Marcos, may mali mga Dilawan."
Then condemn then both! Hindi neutrality ang pagbi-bring up ng kasalanan ng mga Aquino just to make the Marcoses look good.
Ang issue kasi rito ay pinagtatanggol mo ang Marcoses and you're giving them the benefit of the doubt when in fact history makes it completely clear that atrocities have been committed. This isn't about the Aquinos, but kung para sa'yo ganun 'yun then:
Pareho silang mga oportunista who do not deserve a position in the government. Period.
3. 'Yung nangyari lang naman kay Sandro Marcos ang issue. Ano bang kasalanan ni Sandro Marcos?
I'm extremely sensitive about this subject kasi I was one of the people who fell for the Marcos propaganda prior to 2016. I was one of those who repeatedly said na "wala namang kasalanan si BBM/Sandro, bakit niyo siya sinusugod?"
I even debated with this logic back in college โ and in retrospect, fuck, that was so embarrassing. And thank rold hindi pa ako nakakaboto noon.
Here's the thing kasi, BBM, Sandro, and the rest of their family have been living off the money that has been stolen from the country and then refuse to acknowledge it. They turn a blind eye on their misgivings in the past and then just expect the rest of the nation to forget.
Wala man lang acknowledgement, wala man lang apology โ kahit na bare minimum na ang mga ito.
The biggest insult of all: ipinalibing pa ang family patriarch sa Libingan ng mga Bayani na parang deserve niyang ihimlay roon.
So yeah, balik tayo sa original question kanina:
Bakit mas galit pa kayo sa hecklers ng pamilya ng magnanakaw kesa sa mismong mga magnanakaw?
4. May freedom of expression tayo.
I'm bringing this up kasi I saw him use this argument in one of his replies.
Ironic, too, kasi freedom of speech was one of the rights attacked by Martial Law back in the day. Media was state-controlled and outlets were not permitted to post anything critical against the administration. Dissent was also silenced by fear after the writ of habeas corpus was suspended.
Nakakatawa, kasi the freedom that allows you to post your misinformed opinion was the one of the things that were restored after Martial Law was abolished.
Anyway, I've seen his recent posts that he's willing to learn naman from a couple of people. So this post isn't just directed towards him, but to those who agree with his opinion para may opportunity rin kayo to re-evaluate your take on this issue.
Anyway, good day and best wishes to everyone! Get registered and please, please, vote wisely.