Successful pitch: Rachel Hills for The Cut
The wondrous Rachel Hills has written for The Atlantic, Cosmopolitan, Vogue, and many more publications (you can find out more about her here). Rachel has kindly shared a successful pitch with us, one that turned into this The Cut article about "ugly selfies". Thank you, Rachel!
In an era where almost every image we see online (celebrity or otherwise) is carefully posed, curated and photoshopped, is posting an ugly photo a radical act?
I’m a London-based writer on gender, sociology and tech, whose work has been published in The Atlantic, Vogue, Cosmopolitan and many more. I also have a book deal with Simon & Schuster New York. You can find out more about what I do at www.rachelhills.net.
I was hoping you might be interested in a researched analysis piece on the rise of the “ugly selfie”: that is to say, people (usually women) who upload the worst of the 15 photos they take of themselves to Facebook or Instagram, instead of the usual best.
It’s a trend that is manifesting itself in multiple ways: from the “Bad Picture Monday” project in the 15,000-strong Facebook group The Body Is Not an Apology (in which people post the pictures they’re ashamed of), to the Reddit group and Tumblr blog Pretty Girls, Ugly Faces, which is starting to get traction in the blogosphere.
I’m interested in how these projects (and people who are doing the same acts independent of said projects) represent a small, but significant act of rebellion against the perfectly angled, contrast-enhanced photos that dominate Pinterest, Instagram and, well, most of our Facebook display pictures.
I’d like to offer The Cut a researched feature, drawing upon interviews with the people behind Bad Picture Monday and Pretty Girls, Ugly Faces, as well as individual women who post intentionally “ugly selfies”. The feature would look at why they do it, why it’s emerged at this particular moment (the aforementioned deluge of perfectly angled “hot” pics), and its strengths and limitations as an act of rebellion against a culture that demands we be forever "photo-worthy."
The feature would run to 800-1200 words. I’ve already done the bulk of the interviews for a shorter, front-of-book piece that will be published in [OTHER PUBLICATION] in April (who have given me permission to pitch the story elsewhere before they publish), so could have it to you on a fairly tight turn around – say next Tuesday or Wednesday?
I hope to hear from you soon.