Hey, hey, look me in the eyes when I tell you this okay? The whole "do trans women or trans men have it worse?" debate going on right now is the most obvious CIA bullshit on earth cause honestly we've both got it pretty shitty and fighting each other isn't helping anyone
I'm not transgender but I find this argument to be a whole lot of bullshit. You're allowed to talk about your expeirences, but generalizing an entire group of people based on whether they have it worse isn't helping, especially considering the amount of anti-trans laws bwing passed and hate crimes towards transgender people.
I used to be *good* at search. It was a whole thing - I found people's "lost songs" or their unknown-source childhood stuffed toy or whatever from Google.
Now, you can't search for the exact brand/design name of something and get accurate answers. It drives me spare on Amazon - if I search for XYZ and you don't have any, or you only have 2, tell me that.
I wouldn't mind if it said "Here are 2 XYZ. Shoppers also searched for..." Instead it'll just throw a random, barely-linked pile of results and you have to wade through every single one to see if the thing you want exists.
THIS. For ages I used to say that I had "high Google-Fu". I could find *anything* because I knew how to use strings to enhance searches. The string commands haven't even worked for well over a year or more, far before they put in this infernal (and often wrong!) AI BS on top.
I used to be able to search for recipes and easily eliminate unwanted ingredients with a -. For example I'd look for low-carb desserts but without the zillions that use peanut butter simply by searching for something like:
low carb chocolate dessert recipe -peanut
And I'd get a slew of on-point suggestions. For some time now if you do -peanut Google ignores the - and assumes you want recipes stuffed with peanuts.
Where it's even worse now is now you get directed to sites full of bogus AI recipes that don't even make sense. But they have peanuts in them.
I used to be able to use reverse image searches to find out who made that awesome art so I could give credit in my share. They've removed that ability entirely and replaced it with Lens, which is AI BS just showing you more like what you looked for. (Rebecca Watson complained about this in her recent video about JD Vance jizz cup rumours and I apologise for that sentence but...yeah. Watson is great, go find her on Youtube and subscribe because she went into detail about how Google has become less and less useful for debunking.)
This isn't just about Google inserting shopping ads instead of what you wanted to learn about. That's bad. But the results now are just *broken*. The tools we used to have to make searches better have been removed. Google no longer wants us to find the answers we seek, but the answers they want us to have, and that's super creepy and dangerous.
And the alternatives are either using Google in the back end or have other significant barriers to use.
Quite surprised people haven't mentioned other search engines other than DuckDuckGo that either don't use AI or allow you to toggle off AI. I use Startpage, Ecosia, and 1.org.
So you can avoid them stealing things from you, the artist/writer, etc.
Pro GenAI websites/Programs:
Facebook
Instagram
X/Twitter (Remember, Grok gives people cancer)
Threads
Pro Writing Aid
Grammarly
Duolingo
Google Docs
Microsoft Word/all Microsoft products Takes from and will feed their machine.
Youtube (taking advantage of people who are hearing impaired. ==;;)
Adobe Products. All of them. If you HAVE to use them (Some businesses require it), save offline because there is a film of at least some privacy protections there, so if you have to sue, you can say it violates US privacy law. Remember, contracts do not circumvent US law.
Corel won't feed the machines, but still uses AI stolen from other artists. Which sucks since Corel Draw is the second best overall for vector programs. (Plus I love Painter, but I bought the offline version to avoid AI). (Canadian company)
Canva Takes and feeds their machine.
Deviant Art Not only supports AI, but put a tool in and said they are going to steal your work if you like it or not for their machine.
Sketchup went Pro-GenAI. The thing is that you can do the same thing in Blender these days with precise measurements.
Autodesk has stated they are Pro-Gen AI here. It is not clear if they will use your models to feed their machine. But be on guard. They make Maya and 3Dmax. You can replace it with Blender.
Neutral ground:
Tumblr (there is a way to opt out [Link] and they don't have an active AI machine.) https://www.tumblr.com/dookins/743519550598987776/heres-how-to-disable-third-parties-like-ai
Etsy allows GenAI, but still has some (minor) restrictions. I'd still be cautious. (Also be cautious of drop shippers). Complaints about too much AI and AI images+patterns made by Ai still exist on the website. They lean slightly more pro-AI, but still won't let it run completely amok, say like Facebook. They won't feed your work into a machine, but also don't ban it through robots.txt.
Bluesky They don't use an AI algorithm except for in the "Discover" section of their website, but while they are anti-GenAI strongly, they don't seem to block the Gen AI bots from entry, so you'd still have to use Nightshade or Glaze (links below). There is no opt-out because they don't need an opt out. (Leaning towards strong position on AI, but I wish they would block GenAI bots).
Searxng- If you super want to screw over Google, in general, and have some tech savvy, you can set up your own search engine through searxng. It's easier on Windows and Linux than it is on a Mac. (Mac you need Docker), but if you're determined on privacy, Searxng adds a layer of privacy. Some of it sometimes uses bits of AI, but most of it doesn't and you can fuss with the settings so it doesn't spit out AI results. At sheer minimum Google will stop spitting out weird videos on Youtube at you because in your private browsing, you searched for the origin of ball bearings while not logged in for a book and Google likes to break privacy laws.
Strong positions against AI:
Scrivener (Creator vowed against AI) Writing program. There is an active forum, and versions for Mac, Linux and PC. It is paid, but at ~60 USD, it's cheaper than most programs. There is usually a holiday sale around Christmas. It has a learning curve, but with an active forum with the programmer of it there to ask obscure questions it's not a dead zone. They often take suggestions and implement them over time. (Especially if you rank the importance, applications, etc) US company.
LibreOffice Open source and free Spreadsheet and Word processor program that can replace Microsoft Word. Some people might have seen older versions where it was called Neo Office (now extinct) and Open Office. LibreOffice is still populated, plus the forums are super helpful if you get stuck. The UX is pretty intuitive if you've used Microsoft Word. Scrivener, BTW, supports exporting to odt (the native file) as well as .doc, and this can open both. The slight thing is that sometimes it doesn't export to .doc smoothly. And I DO wish more magazines, and agent (big clue here) supported .odt files since it is free. Part of the reason .odt isn't as supported is because Microsoft and Adobe have a deal with the devil with each other, so Adobe's Book formatting program InDesign doesn't support ODT. (BTW, if you have a good open source replacement for InDesign that supports ODT, let me know.)
Dabble (as suggested by SF stories, see reblog) is a writing program. Similar to Scrivener. Has vowed against AI and to resist it. 108 dollars a year for Basic. It is almost twice the price of Scrivener who lets you update for fairly cheap. 29 dollars a month, v. 59 dollars for the whole program (Scrivener) for the same features of Premium. You choose.
yWriter is a free Writing program and like Scrivener, and has vowed against AI Last I looked it had some UX issues, but some people swear by it. The learning curve is higher than Scrivener which is saying something.
Ellipsus is an online writing program and vowed against AI. The main feature I like (which Scrivener doesn't have) is the ability to change spellcheck based on region/language. It is a requested feature of Scrivener, but lower priority. So if you have a Brit, you can get the spelling for the character. They are a British-based company.
Cara.app (The creator of the website sued GenAI there is no chance they'll convert) is an artist website. Cara is trying to institute an auto Glaze/Nightshade into the website if given enough funds. People see it as a soft replacement for deviant art. (which went fully AI) If you believe in human art, please donate if you can. Zhang Jingna, the Creator,is Chinese-Singporean. She lives in Singapore.
Clip Studio Paint added AI, but saw the light and decided to protect artists instead because of protest and removed it. There are tutorials and a good forum if you get super stuck. Based in Japan, so the UI and UX is really clean.
Davinci Resolve Pro is a film editing software that's super good. There is a free version and a paid version. The forums are responsive. The programmers aren't always present. There is a healthy group of tutorials. US company. Clean UX. It does take a little bit of time to remember the shortcuts.
Tahoma2D is anti-AI and open source animation program. Takes a little getting used to, but is good for animations and doesn't crash as often as Animate. Programmers are in the forums and some bugs are fixed within hours. The forums are super responsive and helpful.
Krita open source and free, no AI. I'd rank it secondary to Clip Studio Paint (which is paid) I haven't tried the forums, but it's pretty intuitive and can stand for a lower level replacement for Painter, and do a lot of the basics of Photoshop. It's usually ranked higher than the equally open source Gimp.
Writer P AKA Writer+ (app for when you're on the go) is a simple word processor app for your phone that doesn't use AI. The original programmer stopped updating, so Writer+ person took over and isn't out to make a profit since it's free in the spirit of the original app. It has subfolders you can use. Since it was programmed before GenAI it doesn't have AI. Intuitive, easy to use. Fairly easy to upload the files through three dots->share. The files can save to your card or phone with some settings fussing. Simple word processor.
Inkscape is a free vector program and no AI. It is harder to use than illustrator and has less features. But if you're doing smaller vectors for one-offs with less complexity, it'll do you after some learning curve. Best of the lot. I hate Affinity Designer which is the same thing, only paid. (Neither Affinity program was worth the money paid)
Affinity (Designer, etc) swore to be AI-free and does Vector and Photos. The UX is messy, I dislike the program and regret paying for it. Inkscape and Krita are better UX and do the same thing. The forums aren't as friendly since there has been an onslaught of people seeing it's supposed to be a replacement for Photoshop and Illustrator, but the programmers aren't present. The people on the forums are often on edge about this assertion. And the capabilities of the program don't outshine basically Krita or Inkscape capabilities (both free). What is usually intuitive is not. UK company. If you're going to pay for a program, go for Clip Studio Paint which rivals Corel Painter.
Blender is a 3D art program and does not use GenAI. It can do 2D animation, but Tahoma is easier to use in this regard. It's open source and free. Plus there are plenty of tutorials. The forums can be touch and go sometimes, but there are plenty of sub Blender communities that might be responsive. It can also do animation.
Handmade vowed against AI and promised to never sell itself for stock prices to prevent AI (as a replacement for Etsy.)
Discover a world of creativity and craftsmanship through Handmade, an innovative platform connecting passionate artisans with discerning buy
Proton (to replace Google Suite) as suggested by SF Stories (see reblog) Vowed against AI. They are missing a spreadsheet, but have online and offline capabilities, plus a built-in VPN.
But you need a pro website...
Look up robots.txt and AI bots: https://www.cyberciti.biz/web-developer/block-openai-bard-bing-ai-crawler-bots-using-robots-txt-file/
Use cloudflare:
Use Nightshade:
https://nightshade.cs.uchicago.edu/whatis.html
which will poison the algorithm
Use Glaze:
Take Away:
The thing is you think you doing it alone will do nothing, but the more AI feeds on itself, AI images, the worse they become, and the less detailed so, denying it the images, adding poison or not being able to read the human text is eventually going to lead to an AI collapse.
Analysis shows that indiscriminately training generative artificial intelligence on real and generated content, usually done by scrapi
And why not help that along?
I don't want to give cancer to poor people [Link] or make the planet burn faster [Link]. So GenAI collapse is everything I dream of. GenAI apocalypse is not.
Can we talk about how completely baffling it is that, when it comes to discussions of whether an identity is real or fake, 9/10 it’s Inclusionists who pull in the studies? The historical documents? The journals, zines, surveys, books, and MORE?
Think of mspec lesbians. Exclusionists scream and shout all day, every day, about how mspec lesbians aren’t real, but are also somehow at the same time real enough to cause lesbophobia, biphobia, AND transphobia all at the same time. They also say it’s contradictory. And, most of all, they say it will lead to more [“”“"real”“”“] lesbians to be preyed upon by [cis] men (read: hints of underlying transmisogyny, too).
Okay, cool. So you make these horrible, awful, terrifying claims of mspec lesbians. Can you prove this? And, no, some random person on Twitter does not count. I mean, where is the HISTORICAL evidence? Officially? With actual, backed up evidence? A survey? A document from the 80s, that wasn’t made by a lesbian separatist a.k.a proto-terf, that shows the harms of mspec lesbians? A book, an interview, statistics, ANYTHING? Where are the numbers that prove that mspec lesbians existing is a danger to [”“"real”“”] lesbians?
The answer is that there simply isn’t any. It’s all word of mouth, and that mouth is one twisted into a snarl and grimace of rage.
And then, on the other side, you have inclusionists collecting, piecing together, gathering, and writing up exactly what we need. Political cartoons from the 70s, zines and surveys that showed women who identified as lesbians still experienced attraction to multiple genders in the 80s, the terms and definitions and reasonings for (specifically) bi lesbianism existing and being a label people chose from that same era, evidence that shows hatred and exclusonism of mspec lesbians (and gays/vincians) is T/RF rhetoric down to its very core. We bring SO. MUCH. EVIDENCE. to this table of discussion and debate.
And you know what we get? Nothing. Nothing good. We get attacked, harassed, threatened with MULTIPLE things, belittled, slandered, and more. Why? There’s a lot of reasons for it, but I feel like a lot of it is that they’re just upset that we’re right. Or, rather, they’re upset that we are following our thinking than our feelings.
A lot of anti-mspec lesbian speech is just that. Feelings. It’s driven by innate confusion, fear, and hate of the unknown, the new, and change. It’s seeing a shape in the darkness that resembles something or someone you know, but something is just slightly different. So they get defensive, and scared, and start snapping their jaws at it - saying it doesn’t exist - to make it go away.
But that’s not going to work. Mspec lesbians and gays have been here for decades. We have always existed. We have always been a part of this community. We are not the cause for its grievances, struggles, or oppression. We do not perpetuate anything negative.
Mspec lesbians and gays are real. We belong. We matter. We are important. We deserve a place in the community. We are here.
(Content Warning: Queermisia and Potential Eyestrain, as well as a brief mention of abuse and ableism).
(Additional Disclaimer: Do not use this post to harass people. This is meant to be an awareness post).
The second part to the Exclusionist Symbols post, and the third overall Anti-Exclusionist series post.
Let's just get this overwith. 😅
Aspec Exclusionist Identifiers
So far I only found one Anti-Aspec flag, however I can't find much information on it. Still, best to keep an eye out for it.
(Image ID: A flag with seven horizontal stripes. The first two and last two stripes are shades of green. The third and fifth stripes are blue, and the middle stripe is yellow. End ID).
There are many common identifiers used by allosexual Aspec Exclusionists, including:
"Aces/Aros aren't LGBT" - the most recognizable identifier.
Any use of the word "Cishet" as an identifier for Ace/Aro.
-Just for clarification, this refers to exclus who believe that Aspecs aren't LGBTQ+ because they're "Just cishets". However, keep in mind that there *are* Aspec folks who *do* also consider themselves cishet, and that they are still valid!
Denial of Aces/Aros being oppressed.
However, one thing I don't see many people talk about is the fact that there are also Exclusionary Aspec individuals, which is a surprise because those exclusionists are a *lot* more common than what you might think.
Some identifiers of this specific group include.
"Asexuality/Aromanticism isn't a Spectrum" - yes people genuinely believe this.
Equating Asexuality with being Sex Repulsed, or that all Aromantics are also Romance Repulsed - Something that can easily be seen as misinformation, however some people *do* genuinely use this to exclude other Aspecs too sadly.
"If you feel attraction, you're not Ace/Aro".
Anvil Aro - A term sometimes used by Exclusionary Aros.
Mspec Lesbian/Gay Exclusionist Identifiers
Since Mspec Gay/Lesbian Exclusionism is almost entirely normalized, there isn't much warning signs. However here are some of the obvious ones I found.
Anti-Mspec Lesbian and their varients.
Anything that calls Mspec Lesbians or Lesboys predatory.
Anything that says/implies that Mspec Lesbians "invite cis men to date/harass them" (This is *incredibly* victim blamey as well).
Any variation of Lesbians "not being men" or "not liking men". (Outside of the blatant TERF rhetoric, it also ignores the idea of closeted lesbians dating men to hide their identity as well as ignoring queer history).
And here's an Anti-Mspec Lesbian flag that I've seen mostly on Twitter.
(Image ID: A flag with seven horizontal stripes. The flag has shades of teal on top and shades of purple on the bottom with a white stripe in the middle. End ID.).
Additional Exclusionist Identifiers
Safequeer - A relatively new term that excludes Mspec Monos *and* Endogenic Systems.
Anti-SAM/Anti-Split Attraction Model - Commonly used by Aspec Exclusionists and Mspec Mono Exclusionists.
Safequeer Flags:
(Image ID: Two flags with seven horizontal stripes. Both flags have two orange stripes, a blue stripe, a green stripe, a purple stripe and a red stripe. The first flag has a purple and white Lotus flower in the middle. End ID.)
(Image ID: Two flags with seven horizontal stripes. Both flags contain shades of blue on top as well as a green stripe, and shades of orange on the bottom with a thin yellow stripe in the middle. The first flag also contains a silhouette of a lotus flower outlined in yellow. End ID).
Some Safequeers might also identify themselves using a Lotus flower, however the lotus can also mean multiple things. It's best to check.
Not Queer Exclusionary, but still exclusionist nonetheless:
Sysmed/Anti-Endos - Plural individuals that target Endogenic Systems and other Non-Traumagenic systems, believing that you need trauma or DID/OSDD to be a system. Some Sysmeds are queer, but others are not.
Sysmeds are also referred to as Traumascum, however this term should not be used to address anti-endos due to it's ableist and victim-shaming connotations (There are, however, some anti-endos that also use the term, though it's not widely used by them likely for the reasons I just listed.)
Anti Endo MOGAI or AEMOGAI- A MOGAI group that excludes Endogenic systems.
An "Anti-Fake Systems" flag apparently made by an Anti-Endo, however I can't find much information on it. Still, best to keep an eye for it.
(Image ID: A flag with seven horizontal stripes. The first flag contains shades of blue on top and shades of green on the bottom, with a white stripe in the middle. End ID).
Again, you see *anyone* with these flags, with these keywords, or with any kind of rhetoric I explained here, block them *instantly*.
for those unaware, if you're anti-mspec you are actively contributing to TERF rhetoric. which is funny because I have seen trans and nonbinary individuals who are anti-mspec.
✨🏳️⚧️A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO TERF DOGWHISTLES🏳️⚧️✨
I’ve already posted something similar to this in a reblog, but I figured that for the sake of our safety, I’d rewrite it in a post of its own (with some additions and elaboration). Please consider reblogging this; we need to educate our community on warning signs that hide in plain sight, and once you know what calling cards TERFs use, you’ll be seeing them everywhere.
(Also please note that dogwhistles function in plausible deniability. While some of these points may sound innocuous or incriminating, always check for context clues first before blocking or exposing a potential TERF. Content warning for discussion of transphobic, misogynistic, racist, and anti-SW terminology/ideology under the cut. Please continue at your own discretion.)
• TIM/TIF: “trans-identifying male/female.”
• “Dysphoric female,” used to describe trans men.
• “Gender traitor,” used to shame post-transition men.
• “(Male) invader,” used to describe trans women existing in women’s spaces.
• “Gender-critical” or “gender abolitionist.”
• Weaponization of detransitioners in order to bolster the claim that trans identity is a “phase” or something a person can be manipulated, forced, or “deluded” into.
• Discussion of “irreversible side effects” or “regret rate.”
• “42%” or the number 42, in reference to suicide rates among transgender individuals.
• “Womyn,” “wombyn,” “gyn,” or other omissions of the -man suffix.
• “Adult human female,” used as a mockery against the term “cisgender.”
• “Female homosexual” in the place of “lesbian,” especially if paired with the statement “female homosexuals don’t date men” to invalidate attraction toward trans women.
• “Libfem”: derogatory term for trans-inclusive liberal feminists.
• The 🍒 (referring to Joanna Cherry) and 🏁 (referring to the cis gender binary) emojis.
• TRA: “trans rights activist,” used in a derogatory manner. (Note that this acronym can also mean “transracial adoption,” which has nothing to do with bigoted rhetoric.)
• “Peak trans (moment),” used to describe a TERF’s moment of radicalization.
• Any discussion of “rapid-onset gender dysphoria”. It’s transphobic psuedoscience and does not exist.
• Transmedicalism: the idea that you’re not “actually trans” unless you have a desire to medically transition. TERFS will use this to invalidate and demonize trans individuals who don’t “pass.”
• Use of the term DSD (“disorder of sexual development”) instead of intersex, and/or advocating for the “medical correction” of intersex bodies.
• Invalidation of, exclusion of, or aggressions against intersex people.
• Exclusion or invalidation of aspec identities (asexual, aromantic, aroace, etc).
• Exclusion or invalidation of mspec attraction (pansexuality, bisexuality, etc), usually on the basis of one being a “traitor” if they like men and women.
• “TMA” (transmisogyny-affected) and “TME” (transmisogyny-exempt). These terms continue to enforce a binary on gender-nonconforming individuals and encourage transandrophobic beliefs (namely that transmascs “have it easier” and “aren’t as oppressed”).
• Disownment of the term “queer,” normally rooted in assimilationist ideals.
• Discussion of autogynophilia or autoandrophilia, implying that trans identity is a “sexual fetish.”
• “Fetishist” being used as an insult, specifically against trans women or sexually autonomous trans individuals.
• Anti-kink puritanism and the treatment of (particularly female) sexual liberation as a shame or taboo.
• Applying the “male gaze” argument to real-life women who are open about and comfortable in their sexuality.
• “What about the children?!” rhetoric, specifically manifesting in claims that children are being groomed, indoctrinated, or forced into “dangerous” medical procedures.
• Language such as “transgenderism,” “gender ideology,” “genderist,” “gender cult,” or other terms that pathologize trans identity.
• Denial of intersectionality’s effect on systems of oppression and the belief that the patriarchy is solely to blame for all of women’s problems.
• The false equivalency fallacy: comparing bigoted ideologies to the struggles of marginalized groups to garner sympathy (ex. “TERF is a slur” or “POC feel safer in their own spaces, why are bathroom bans any different?”)
• Self-proclaimed “radfems.” (Keep in mind this is a VERY tricky one, simply because many people don’t fully understand what radfem ideology entails.)
• An open hatred toward all men.
• Denial of the fact that men can be oppressed or harmed, manifesting in accusing people of being “MRAs” if they advocate for trans, queer, disabled, POC, or otherwise marginalized men.
• Insinuation that women cannot be oppressive, abusive, or predatory, and that these traits are only exhibited by men.
• Strong aversion to being called cis or claiming the word is a slur.
• “LGB community” or “LGB, drop the T.” Any exclusion of a letter from the acronym could be a warning sign for bigotry or exclusionism.
• The Hydra symbol, used to portray trans individuals as an ever-expanding threat.
• “Did you just assume my gender?!” or “I identify as a ___” being used as mocking comments.
• Excessive use of biological terminology (“basic biology,” “female/male biology,” “biological markers,” “biological sex,” etc.)
• Transvestigating: intense scrutiny of one’s appearance and anatomy, especially around stereotypically gendered traits (body hair, eyelashes, muscles, height, facial structure, hips, waist, chest, etc.)
• Phrenology: a form of pseudoscience claiming that one’s character can be determined by their facial shape and proportion. Phrenology holds extremely racist/antisemitic implications and heavily favors femme Eurocentric beauty standards, leading to women with non-European features being “transvestigated” or viewed as masculine and therefore “brutish” or “threatening.”
• Conflation of feminine expression or aesthetics with purity or goodness (oftentimes overlapping with phrenology).
• Noticeable disgust or bitterness toward masculine/butch gender expression.
• Erasure of nonbinary identity or categorization of nonbinary people into their AGAB.
• Gender purism: any belief that there’s a “right” and “wrong” way to be a woman.
• Gender essentialism: belief that all men are born as violent oppressors and all women are inherently fragile and vulnerable.
• Belief that testosterone directly causes violent impulses and aggression.
• Separatism: enforced separation of men and women, specifically manifesting in “women only” spaces and the belief that trans women are “male invaders” trying to enact violence on other women.
• Defining the “female experience” exclusively by suffering, physically or mentally.
• Discussion of the “divine feminine,” female energy,” or co-opting of spiritual terminology to advocate gender essentialism.
• “Woman-born woman,” “AFAB woman,” “biological woman,” or “natal woman” as an avoidance of the word “cisgender.”
• Defining womanhood as the possession of a womb and the ability to menstruate and give birth, usually paired with the statement “men can’t have babies/periods.”
If you stuck around for this long, thank you for taking the time to look through this. If you know of any other potential dogwhistles, I invite you to reblog this post or comment with your additions so I can add them into this list.
TERFS will be blocked on sight. You are not fucking welcome here. Trans people will always exist, are valid as fuck, and deserve the right to life and happiness.