❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
wallacepolsom
almost home
PR's Tumblrdome
Discoholic 🪩
Sade Olutola
No title available
Keni
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
YOU ARE THE REASON
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Product Placement
Show & Tell
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
tumblr dot com
AnasAbdin
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Argentina
seen from Ecuador
seen from Malaysia
@yunalesckaa
TUMBLR IS A PUBLISHER NOT A PLATFORM SUPPORTING HUMAN LIBERTIES! Tumblr is dropping censorship hammer on people for different political and ideological opinions.
Tumblr is not the social platform for free thinkers at all. Only for establishment indoctrinated lemmings.
Mueller Report was a WASTE OF MY MONEY
Liberals Betray Illegal Immigrants!.
Black Lives Matter Destroy the Edmonton Pride Parade
The Politics of Clown World
Data Shows Identity Politics FORCED Liberals To Vote TRUMP [MUST WATCH]
LOOK! You see THAT! look how far Left the Left is in that data graph! The Right is centered!
Ha! The Left calls Trump’s sanctuary city plan cruel and immoral? Need I remind the Left that their baiting the immigrants to come to the border illegally makes the women risk their children rape, kidnapping and used as drug mules.
Love Thomas Sowell!
History lesson: Idealists get people killed.
Why Would Anyone Oppose Trumps' Sanctuary City Plan?
If you believe illegal immigrants are a net positive, why would you not want them bussed to areas which explicitly support amnesty or open borders? http://tinyurl.com/yylanagx
[Video transcript:] I’m trying to understand why there’s anybody who would opposed Trump’s sanctuary city plans. See what’s happened is this basically the judiciary and Congress are leaning on him to not detain people so much they’re like all the situations the detention centers is deplorable, so you have to let people go and you can’t deport them because you know we we have clown world immigration laws at this point.
We’re simply not enforcing pre-existing laws Congress is literally refusing to enforce laws that it itself passed long before Trump was president. I think that it’s you know nutty, I think it’s totally insane but you know they’ve got the ninth circuit on their side so SCOTUS really needs to expedite this issue. But we have what’s called in this country “Sanctuary Cities” which are places where of course you can be an illegal and and local law enforcement and state law enforcement in some cases won’t interfere, they don’t look into it, they don’t cooperate with ICE because for some reason that’s that’s not you know and for some reason that doesn’t lead to any repercussions anymore it’s very funny to see the Democrats become a Confederate movement again I suppose.
But basically what Trump says is “Aah I’ve got an idea, I know how to solve all of our problems, you say you want illegals to be there and you don’t have a problem with that so we’re gonna bus em to your communities! We’re gonna take people from the detention centers, all these families, you know, the women and children and we’re gonna put them in your communities!” “oh my god no you’re not allowed to do that”, they say and he’s moving forward with it anyway. I’m trying to think, like people who support Trump you shouldn’t have a problem with it, look the sanctuary cities by SCOTUS are gonna get crackdown on anyway, so it’s just going to compact the issue into these particular locales, they can pay for the problem and as for people that are like maybe believe in more open borders, you don’t have a problem with illegals, you want amnesty, or something, you want this situation to happen, what does it matter?
If it’s ten people or ten thousand people that move into your town, why is it that California wouldn’t want a few tens of millions of more illegal immigrants? Doesn’t matter I mean they can get driver’s licenses and too, so I mean why are you such a racist dude? I’ll tell you what it is, it’s the gated community “not in my backyard” people, it’s the its people in Lily white communities all these so-called the pseudo-intellectual yuppies and a bunch of of Starbucks Marxist college kids want open borders, but they live in their gated communities, but if you start busing in a hundred times as many people, their gated communities will be overrun.
Eventually you’ll need little resettlement centers and you should put them right in the upper class neighborhoods too, you should put them right in the lily white neighborhoods that way these people can see the result of their actions. Maybe then they’d stop me you know maybe if they have to live in the real world most people have to live in, then the things would be different, it’s just and the Liberals will make this same proposal with education, I’ve heard this argument before: “Oh ban private school and put everyone in public school and all of a sudden all these evil rich people will want to fund the schools more,” yes they would, well then you know take responsibility for people who don’t want to be part of that experiment of having an open borders weird society in which the nation-state has fundamentally devolved away back into a weird patchwork Confederacy, oddly enough almost more than it has into a global-istic sort of movement.
Why do you care? Why do you care how many illegals are in your community? I thought that they were a net positive, wherever they happen to be, “oh no no illegal immigrants are great”, yeah and then some of them by the way are definitely great people, well then you should have more of them. What are you worried about? Your taxes increasing? Fuck the taxes. You want to increase taxes on everyone anyway to pay for your pet programs.
I don’t see what the problem is, and by the way I’ll say this; Vermont, is a sanctuary state and there are certainly plenty of communities in Vermont that are sanctuary cities including briefly Rutland although that’s been pushed to the side. Yeah I support bringing a bunch of illegals here to Vermont, I’ll tell you why; because then if it causes problems, the people of the state of Vermont maybe will recognize why they shouldn’t be voting straight Left in every fucking election. Maybe they would realize “hey immigration is fine but maybe there should be a legal process for them, maybe we should not reward, maybe we should not take seriously the Democrats, a political movement that fundamentally has told hundreds of millions of people around Latin America “you can come here illegally and we will not allow you to be deported and if you get detained we will make sure that you are eventually released, you should be considered the same as taxpaying citizens” - That is what the Democratic Party fundamentally believes or appears to believe. That’s basically what it’s saying it’s a psychological signal.
The biggest problem that we have with immigration is it’s not even on the ground policy at the US border, it not deportation or anything it’s the appearance, it’s the floorshow, it’s the fact that a large chunk of our political system has signaled to the rest of the world “you can go ahead and trot all over us and ignore our laws and there are no real repercussions for them”. As for the detention facilities, you know the basic cause for why this is now happening - yeah it’s absolutely true that the detention facilities are overrun - whose fault is that? You aren’t even willing to give Trump funding for border security. Part of that was earmarked for more detention centers.
By the way I don’t like the idea of detaining, especially children and pregnant women, you caused them to come here by signaling that the border was open for business for whoever came and by “you” I mean the Left. It wasn’t Trump that did that Trump said he wanted to build a wall that would have dissuaded people from even making the catastrophicly dangerous journey, which fucking half the females get raped on the way here in the first place, they get to the border half of them get turned into drug mules, cartels try to draft people, terrorists filtering among them, you are causing innocent people to suffer and you’re now going to cause people in sanctuary cities to suffer.
I support this move because then maybe those people, when they see the true result of an open border situation, when they see that yes indeed enormous numbers of people want to enter your community and you’re not going to be able to stop them because you’ve set the stage to call people evil if they think that that policy should be any different, why don’t you just let those cities that have signaled that they don’t have a problem with it, take all of the illegal immigrants that get released from the detention centers? We should return to catch and release only to release them in the sanctuary cities, and then those you know they can’t legalize those individuals unilaterally the federal government has to do that and that’s obstructed right now, so enjoy at least two more years of struggle probably six.
Then some liberal president will come and try to do what Obama did with executive amnesty. You remember that right? You do remember that Obama, who when he or initially ran he was actually more of a hardliner on immigration. He’s like “wow I know hurts the American worker and stuff”, he did the Bernie Sanders shtick all over again, you Bernie bros are being totally conned by Bernie Sanders. Do you realize, go back and hear what Obama had to say around 2007 about immigration, sounds kind of similar now doesn’t it? What do you think he’s gonna do? No he’ll do the same as Obama - what was it 2013 or something? Executive amnesty, “well I’m just gonna sign my little piece of paper here and legalize 4 million people”, well then the court shot it down and said “no Mr. Obama you can’t do that”, you can keep them from being deported actively by refusing to do your job but you can’t actually give them residency. That’s why Trump can’t unilaterally deport everybody, but he can release them in the country.
I love this program. I think it’s a great idea and it trolls the Left. It trolls the same people that they’re like Not in my backyard-ers, they’ll say like “we need prison reform” but if you say that you want that prisoners rehab facility in their neighborhood they don’t want it. “We need more green energy but don’t you put those windmills near my house”. “Oh immigration is great but don’t you resettle them here”. “Migrants, we need to help asylum seekers, refugees but don’t you put the resettlement program in my neck of the woods”. That’s what these people are and that’s most of the Liberals, that’s the whole problem.
____________
That’s the thing about the left, they push for any program as long as it doesn’t inconvenience them or have to deal with the consequences of their policies. Virtue signaling makes them feel good about themselves, they don’t care about the consequences.
Democrats don’t want illegal aliens taken to sanctuary cities/states because they don’t need them there. They already have an electoral stranglehold on those places. They need them flooding red states (like Texas) to shift the balance of electoral power in their favor. The left’s scam and cheating the system is clear to see from people with a brain and dont agree with the Left manipulating people for their own thirst for power.
Go gurl!
Candice Owens SHREDS Racist Democrats in Congress With Facts They REFUSE To Face.
Video Transcript:
The gripe against the white man, I was simply never taught to view myself as a victim because of my heritage. I learned about faith in God, family and hard work, those were the only lessons of my childhood. There isn’t a single adult today that in good conscience would make the argument that America is a more racist or a more white nationalist society than it was when my Grandfather was growing up and yet we’re hearing these terms sent around today because what they want to say is that brown people need to be scared, which seems to be the narrative that we hear every four years right ahead of a presidential election.
Here are some things we never hear: 75 percent of the black boys in California don’t meet state reading standards. In inner cities like Baltimore within five high schools in one middle school not a single student was found to be proficient in math or reading in 2016. The single motherhood rate in the black community, which is that 23% mid-1960s and my grandfather was coming up and so the staggering 74 percent today. I am guessing there will be no committee hearings about that. There are more black babies aborted than born alive in cities like New York and you have Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo lighting up buildings to celebrate late term abortions. I could go on and on. My point is that white nationalism did not do any of those things that I just brought up. Democrat policies did.
Let me be clear; the hearing today is not about white nationalism or hate crimes, it’s about fear mongering, power and control. It’s a preview of a Democrat 2020 election strategy, same as the Democrat 2016 election strategy. They blame Facebook, they blame Google, they blame Twitter, really they believe the birth of social media, which has disrupted their monopoly on minds. They called this hearing because they believe that if it wasn’t for social media, voices like mine would never exist. My movement #Blexit, which is inspiring black Americans to leave the Democrat Party would have never come about and they certainly believe that Donald Trump would not be in office today looking on the next thing to focus on not up the crushin collusion hoax has fallen apart.
What they won’t tell you about the statistics and the rise of white nationalism is that they’ve simply changed the data set points by widening the definition of hate crimes and upping the number of reporting agencies that are able to report on them. What I mean to say is that they’re manipulating statistics.
The goal here is to scare blacks, Hispanics, gays and Muslims into helping them center to set helping them censor dissenting opinions ultimately into helping them regain control of our country’s narrative which they feel that they lost. They feel that President Donald Trump should not have beat Hillary. If they actually were concerned about white nationalism they would be holding hearings on Antifa; a far-left violent white gang who determined one day in Philadelphia and August that I; a black woman was not fit to sit in a restaurant. They chased me out, they yelled ‘race traitor’ to a group of black and Hispanic police officers who formed a line to protect me from their ongoing assaults, they threw water at me, they threw eggs at me and the leftist media remained silent on it.
They were serious about the rise of hate crimes they may perhaps be examining themselves and the hate they have drummed up in this country. Bottom line is that white supremacy, racism, white nationalism words that once held real meaning have now become nothing more than election strategies, every four years the black communities is offered handouts and fear. Handouts and fear. Reparations and white nationalism. This is the Democrats preview.
Of course society is not perfectible. We’ve heard testimony of that today, there are pockets of evil that exists and those things are horrible and they should be condemned. I believe the legacy in the ancestry of black Americans is being insulted every single day. I will not pretend to be a victim in this country. I know that that makes many people on the Left uncomfortable. I want to talk about real issues in black America. I want to talk about real issues in this country and real concerns.
The biggest scandal in American politics is so that Democrats have been conning minorities into belief that we are perpetual victims, all but ensuring our failure. Racial division and class warfare are central to the Democrat Party platform; the blacks to hate white’s, the rich to hate the poor and soon enough it’ll be the tall hating the short.
My 2 cents: at the end what she is describing there is the Left’s dogma; Intersectionality, class warfare, Marxism, like her last words the “tall hating the short”, they already have the whole “thin/beauty privilege” B.S. The Left’s ideology and platform is about diving people into sub categories and pitting them against each other based on differences. They polarize simple truths, facts of life, concepts and label them “problematic” so they can deconstruct them and their purpose and implement their policies and changes based on equity, not equality. It isn’t about helping people, it is about tearing people down to make those at the bottom feel like they’re being boosted up when the other are being held back or pushed at the end of the line. Equality of outcome is not equality to the masses who want different things and can achieve better than what the ones in control deem they should get. Those in power decide the outcome, not the people. In doing this it doesn’t jeopardize the corrupt global elite positions and that is how they want it to stay. And that is not equality but that is what they promote it to be. And they want to talk about supremacy, the ones manipulating and exploiting people through abuse of power for their own selfish gains are the only supremacists I see prevalent is modern society *coughsSiliconeVallycoughs*
The Dems are still the party of slavery and race baiting and eugenics.
What she said deserves to go viral. But MSM and silicone valley will just censor it and call her far right or some dumb crap like that.
#GamerGate is Not Responsible for Christchurch. Of course #GamerGate was dragged into it.
JK Rowling Has FAKE Wokeness Exposed! Hilarious Backfire For Harry Potter. JK Rowling gets exposed & laughed at for her fake wokeness and pandering in the fantastic beasts crimes of grindlewald movie!
The Lamestream Cannot Survive Peace and Calm, so they Stir Up Hate and Chaos. It is inevitable that those who profit off misery will foment it. The Left realizes this to be true of arms dealers so why not the corporate press or their own rich politicians?
Gotta say its poor form that they don’t bother writing LGBT characters in their canon, they instead use gay baiting to virtue signal to the regressive crowd, shill media activists and fanfic writers that fetishes LGBT relationships and hides behind fake advocation to push their politics and agenda. Again, I tip my hat to people that put a lot of work and effort into creating original works and respectfully represent minorities. JK Rowling just says it after her stuff is published for social brownie woke points and woke praise.
JK is a very hard-core feminist. She hates men generally and blames all the problems on the “patriarchy”.
She is 100% invested in the intersection hierarchy and sees herself as being oppressed as a woman. Spreading LGBT is critical to feminism and is to her benefit. They are codependent movements to some degree . They are just trying to capitalize on the fact that they can milk her for privilege points. The most fervent feminists are sexual minority women, if you can even call them that.
They act like nutball religious fanatics.
I think it’s less the left falling for what the shooter wanted and more the authoritarian left not letting a good tradegy go to waste.
Twitter Execs on JRE Contradicted By Undercover Video of Twitter Engineers
[transcript:]
James O’Keefe: So you may have heard by now that the CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey won on the Joe Rogan podcast yesterday (Link to podcast - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZCBRHOg3PQ )
along with his colleague Vijaya Gadde, head of trust and safety who does legal work for Twitter. Check out what these two say to Joe Rogan about monitoring your direct messages:
Joe Rogan: Do you read direct messages? Jack Dorsey: we don’t read direct messages Vijaya Gadde: we don’t read them unless someone reports a direct message to us that they have received JR: does anyone in the company have access to direct messages other than that? VG: only in the context again of reviewing reports
James O’Keefe: So we may have a contradiction between what Vijaya Gadde told Joe Rogan and what our undercover cameras captured Mr. Clay Haynes, senior network security engineer at Twitter telling us
Project Veritas undercover at Twitter videos (or watch clips in above video):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgyPpsX2B0g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64gTjdUrDFQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMU4SZ_Cims
James O’Keefe: Not only does Clay Haynes talk about how he peruses private messages and looks at private pictures, he says that there are hundreds of people at Twitter dedicated to reading direct messages for this purpose.
And not only are there hundreds of people dedicated to doing this again Pranay Singh who works on Twitter’s direct messaging team says they store all this stuff from private direct messages on their server for analytical and advertising purposes.
James O’Keefe: And if that isn’t a contradiction how about this closing remark from Twitter’s Clay Haynes (watch video above)
JR: Does anyone in the company have access to direct messages other than that? VG: Only in the context again of reviewing reports.
Clips from Joe Rogan’s podcast with Jack Dorsey and Vijaya Gadde, featuring Tim Pool
Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant
How Jack Dorsey Feels About Government Regulation of Twitter
Twitter Plans to Address Left Wing Bias Perception
Tim Pool Asks Twitter Execs if They Take Cues from the SPLC
forgot some, here is more videos on the podcast
Tim Pool Asks Twitter Execs About Election Meddling & US Law
Tim Pool DESTROYS Twitter on Joe Rogan Podcast
Why is Antifa Allowed On Twitter When Proud Boys Aren’t?
Tim Pool Tells Twitter Exec They Have a Liberal Bias
Tim Pool Obliterates Twitter’s Censorship Rules
I thought Tim did a fantastic job. I wish more on the left or center left would have the balls and integrity to stand up against the censorship and bias
Tim slayed that freaking blue bastard bird dead
hmm so now I gusta watch it
I haven’t seen it in years! It is decent film. Worth a watch.
Your feelings are not your gender, they are your personality. Enough of your mental gymnastics, quit forcing your ideological pseudoscience cult groupthink onto society.
This has been a public service announcement.
TRANSTRENDERS STOP YOUR NARCISSISTIC BULLSHIT.
GENDER DYSPHORIA IS NOT A FUCKING JOKE!!!!
AND YOU ARE ALL MOCKING IT WITH YOUR IDIOTIC CLAIMS THAT YOUR HAIR STYLE AND FASHION CHOICES EQUAL A NEW GENDER.
IT DOESN’T.
WE HAD THAT SHIT BEFORE
GOTHS, EMOS, PUNKS, SKATERS, TOMBOYS – THEY ARE NOT NEW GENDERS.
YOU’RE JUST ATTENTION SEEKING WHORES WHO WANT TO BE EXTRA SPECIAL IN THE OPPRESSION OLYMPICS.
YOUR FUCKERY HARMS THE LEGIT TRANS COMMUNITY WHO DO TRANSITION FROM 1 TO THE 2ND GENDER - THE ONLY 2 GENDERS.
YOU ARE HARMING THEM MORE BY CLAIMING OTHERWISE FROM THE BIOLOGICAL AND SCIENTIFIC FACTS.
The Post Modernists in academia have turned the medical condition of gender and body disphoria into an ideology and are targeting kids to convince them to be “trans”. My cousin’s kids reported that their are activists that pushing this idea that everyone is a blank slate when that is not true, that contradicts the whole “gays are born gay”
Now she looks like a feminist :3
Funimation gets backlash over Vic Mignogna! More KickVic lies exposed!
the DBZ fan comments are funny in this video and I stand with them.
CLASSIC SJW NPC SPEWS OUT TALKING POINTS SJW FAILS AND CRINGE #82
Multi hair colors, terrible piercings and all the ingredients for classic sjw cringe
zero respect for these crazies
Sometimes the truth hurts. It doesn’t make it hate speech.
Compilation on Jussie Smollett
Related videos:
Jussie Smollett: The Boy Who Cried Hate crime
Jussie Smollett Faces FEDERAL Prison Time, FBI Involved from DAY ONE
Jussie Smollet and The Rise of HOAX Hate Crimes
Jussie Smollett’s Story Falls Completely Apart, Hoax Begins To Materialize!
Jussie Smollett STAGED the attack?!
The Media Gaslighting Over Jussie Smollett HOAX Has Begun
BREAKING: Jussie Smollett Named as Suspect, Video Shows Brothers Buying Red hats and masks
Jussie Smollett Busted - Media Gets Caught with Pants Down Again
Jussie Smollett DENIES HOAX Is SHOCKED His Friends Were the Perpetrators
“WHAT A PIECE OF SH*T: Jussie Smollett”
Jussie Smollett’s Anti-Trump Story Falls Apart
The Left Wishes Smollett Was Telling The Truth
Far Left BEGGING For Jussie Smollett To Be A VICTIM.
Jussie Smollett WILL NOT Be Meeting With Chicago Police
Jussie Smollett LAWYERED UP, FBI Involved?! Dude May Be IN SERIOUS Trouble
JUSSIE SMOLLETT “MAGA Country” HOAX NOT CONFIRMED YET
Police and Media Think Jussie “MAGA Country” Event a HOAX
Police WILL Charge Jussie If MAGA Country Attack Is A Hoax
NEW EVIDENCE In “MAGA Country” Incident Draws Scrutiny
“MAGA Country” Attack Sounds Like A Hoax Or Publicity Stunt
Mainstream Media Spins GOP Reaction To Smollett Story
Smollett Incident Shows Hollywood Has A Sad View Of America
There is a lot of other things going on I want to cover, This story has been going on for weeks, now it has revealed itself to be another fake hate crime, a hoax. I want to move on to the other things. So here is a compilation of videos and I won’t be doing any transcripts and screenshots. Check out more fake crimes and hoaxes, about over 300 of them by leftist activists and others at: FakeHateCrimes.Org
To people out there that pull shit like this and activists, stop doing it.
Mainstream media will label any theory as a conspiracy theory if: A - It goes against their agenda B - It negatively affects somebody giving them money C - It is true
The whole reason that conspiracy theories have a negative connotation in the first place is because the government/media want to shut down and discredit any information that cast them in a negative light, especially if it is true.
People Keep Vandalizing Karl Marx's Grave
Great points countering the lefty article about this ^ the article in defense of Marx and Communism is pretty laughable. Well worth a listen. I might make a separate post highlighting the best parts.
[Ending snippet of video transcript :] “Your feelings are only yours and what you are doing is saying “yes it’s right to become some kind of weird hateful obsessive ideologue” and this hate will consume you, it will turn you into a bad person, into a vengeful venomous bitter person who sees nothing but an oppression everywhere, even if it doesn’t necessarily exist as long as it’s ideologically correct. It’s not good for you personally to view the world through such a hateful lens but the Marxists need it, it’s their religion, they need the enemy to fight because fighting it makes them feel good.”
Doctrine of Hate: http://archive.is/ZStQK [rough video transcript, sorry for any errors :]
“Karl Marx’s grave was vandalized for the second time in like as many weeks, I think over there in England actually, which is funny, why he would be buried outside of the Soviet Union? I suppose they should import his fucking bones to Russia. They should send him to Venezuela to be with his people. Was vandalized with heartwarming slogans like ‘doctrine of hate’, ‘architect of genocide’ and I’m thinking to myself like I’m of two minds because on one hand I mean it’s all true, everything that’s said on the grave you know 66 million dead although that might underestimate it, communism is one of the - is the bloodiest ideology that ever existed in the world, like has killed way more people than religion - at least directly.
Like you’ve got tens of millions dead and purges tens of millions more dead because of the mismanagement of economies, like Pol Pot with his back to the rice farming initiative sort of bullshit he’s like “well I’m gonna take people who don’t know how to farm I’m gonna kill like you know a third of them or so and the rest of them I’m gonna put out in these little collective farms and expect them to make a certain amount of grain” and then because it was incentivized; always think of incentive when you’re looking at policy, incentive when you’re looking at policy it was incentivized for the local sort of partyís to overestimate the amount that was being grown and so people never actually had anything to eat, like half the country starved, now Cambodia went from having some degree of development to being basically there is none it’s a completely pastoral underdeveloped society with virtually no world economic presence beyond exporting some food. That’s basically all it is, they’re still suffering the effects now.
So you have people like Pol Pot or Che Guevara who used to love to kill you know random civilians, you have certainly someone like Stalin who his idea of fun was purging people. Pol Pot was the worst by the way, he may have personally participated and he actually took glee in it, like with these others it’s more like “well I just don’t give a fuck about you” with Pol Pot it’s like “oh I give a fuck I find it funny to pile your skulls into a mountain” he was a real sicko. All of the worst dictators throughout history appear to have been communists they’re the ones with the highest death tolls.
Communism blows every other ideology out of the water. Capitalism’s death toll is negative because the advances of Capitalism have improved lives for basically everyone to the point where in the Soviet Union a like “oh we’ve got an underground market economy”. But here’s what I would say about grave desecration; I don’t care that Karl Marx is the godfather of the most bloody ideology in history. That’s like me saying “well you know the American Revolution killed a lot of people so some British general from from that era who still celebrated over in England I’m gonna go there and egg his grave”, like no he’s a pile of bones, it’s just a rock with some words on it carved and sitting on top of a dusty fucking skeleton.
Karl Marx can’t make anymore ideologies, he can’t write any more shitty books with his pseudo-intellectual garbled nonsense, where he pontificates theories that have been completely discredited because they have nothing to do with our anthropology or a proper understanding of evolutionary biology.
Karl Marx can’t spew his bullshit anymore, neither can Stalin that would be like hey I’m gonna go to like Stalin’s mausoleum and smash the glass and I’m gonna you know play with his dead body and smear his face around, it wouldn’t be symbolic maybe but it doesn’t accomplish anything. You’d be better off instead of vandalizing his grave - you’re better off going and informing other people about the evils of communism and this isn’t the way to do it, no it means like you’re a vandal and the dead should be allowed to sleep.
This is why how this is this any different for saying well tear down the Confederate statue you know you shouldn’t stare down any statue no you shouldn’t beat the statues heel it’s like when the Iraqis toppled the Saddam statue and stuff why it’s a fucking
piece of what was it bronze I think in that case or cement or some is too cheap to afford marble you know it’s like the Saddam statue isn’t Saddam Hussein. Karl Marx’s grave isn’t Karl Marx’s bones, are there or maybe he was cremated, maybe it’s an urn buried under it, I don’t know.
It’s like yeah he’s dead much like millions other people because of his stupid ideology but he didn’t personally kill these people, he’s not able to do any more damage. So let the let the dead rest. Karl Marx was a madman, his theories were clearly wrong, we can prove that they were wrong, organization is innate, people are not anarchic, a stateless communist society cannot exist, socialism is only a stepping stone to misery, authoritarianism is the natural root of all evil in its various forms whether it’s theocratic or communistic or whatever it happens to be. Karl Marx was a madman, he was a talentless hack, that’s all he was but I mean he’s no longer with us, thankfully he’s just a pile of fucking bones. I don’t really care about the moral proposal because when you think about it all you have to do is scrub the stone, they didn’t even disinterred the body or fiddle with their remains this is just the the marker above his actual grave. I can understand that it’s basically like splash some water on it, scrub it for an hour and it’s gone but I mean at the same test like what does it accomplish other than to make it look like people who don’t like communism are unhinged? Vandalism is usually not a very popular act among most people in society. Again you’re literally better off - you’re gonna accomplish more if you go online and shitpost on a commie forum about how they’re mindless stooges, which they are, you’re gonna turn more heads anyway. Troll the commies.
If a communist is still alive and they’re causing problems and trying to get purge people or whatever then you deal with it because they’re actually a threat. Karl Marx can’t threaten anyone unless a sinkhole opens up under his grave, you know Satan decides to take him down further into the ground be a little bit closer to the center of the earth and the nice warm lava in there because you know it’s pretty cold over there in England. Unless that happens and someone trips over the sinkhole and falls into the grave and starves to death or something while they’re inside because you know gnawing on Karl Marx’s bones it they’re not recent enough to have any nutritional value it may have a few dusty scraps of skin that’d be funny to grind your teeth along his skull and eat up all of his fucking commie skull grease unless that happens he can’t hurt you.
Now it’s just a boogeyman at this point, he is a boogieman for many people they probably have nightmares about some communist dictator coming to power because they lived through communism. People that were behind the Iron Curtain, people that’ll all warn you know don’t be a socialist, meanwhile all these decadent idiots, all these pompous jackasses in the Western European government “so oh ho communism is great it’s the Nazis that are a problem” you know the non-existent ones primarily. Karl Marx is no longer in the land of the living, thank goodness, should be celebrated. You should have a celebration on that anniversary of his death next to his grave every year but don’t fucking you know leave him a vodka bottle so that he can drink it in the afterlife. I’m sure that he needs a refreshing drink considering where according at least to judeo-christianity he would certainly be located.”
How do we know it was not actually done by a Marxist to incite outrage against the Right? It’s not like hoaxes aren’t a thing these days.
