h
Mike Driver
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism
One Nice Bug Per Day
Claire Keane
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Game of Thrones Daily
tannertan36
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Product Placement
titsay
The Stonewall Inn
izzy's playlists!
noise dept.
pixel skylines
Andulka
seen from United States
seen from Jordan
seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from Japan
seen from Canada
seen from Indonesia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
@zaziecurie
everyone i've talked to about this has been completely unaware so: if you didn't know already, there's going to be a solar eclipse, with totality or coverage of 90% or more in some places, over a lot of europe, on august 12th 2026. in the uk it will start just after 6pm, and the maximum will be at 7:13pm.
here is a map of the path of the eclipse (from timeanddate)
get eclipse glasses if you want to look at it. it is not safe to look at through sunglasses. ok informative post over o7
today is snoopy's birthday! ♡
Mammal in a Sunday Dress, by Georgina M. Cox, 2026
Mammal in a Sunday Dress explores the uneasy relationship between femininity, civilisation, and the animal body. At first glance, the figure appears modest and withdrawn. Her posture is composed, her gaze seemingly lowered towards her bare feet, recalling the conventions of nineteenth-century portraiture where women were often depicted as passive objects of observation. Yet as the viewer moves closer, the illusion collapses. Her eyes are not lowered at all. She is looking directly back. The delayed eye contact transforms the encounter. The viewer approaches believing they are safely observing a woman; instead, they realise they have been observed themselves. The work refuses the traditional power dynamic of portraiture, denying the comfort of anonymous spectatorship. Looking becomes a reciprocal act. For Cox, the painting considers humanity's persistent desire to separate itself from the rest of the animal kingdom. The title quietly undermines this distinction. A "mammal" is not another creature—it is us. The Sunday dress, rich with cultural associations of femininity, morality, and respectability, becomes an attempt to distinguish ourselves from nature. Yet clothing cannot alter biology. Beneath lace and ritual remains the same vulnerable animal body. The work also reflects on the historical relationship between women and nature. Across art, religion, and philosophy, women have repeatedly been positioned as closer to instinct, emotion, reproduction, and the body itself, while men have been aligned with reason, culture, and civilisation. Mammal in a Sunday Dress does not reject this comparison. Instead, it questions why proximity to nature has so often been treated as something lesser. Chiaroscuro isolates the figure within darkness, allowing the luminous dress to symbolise the performance of civilisation while the bare feet quietly return the body to the earth. Neither is presented as more truthful than the other. The painting exists in the tension between performance and instinct, refinement and biology. Mammal in a Sunday Dress ultimately asks a simple but unsettling question: if every layer of culture were stripped away, what would remain? Not a king. Not a saint. Not a gentleman or a lady. Only another mammal, looking back.
source
Mammal in a Sunday Dress, by Georgina M. Cox, 2026
Mammal in a Sunday Dress explores the uneasy relationship between femininity, civilisation, and the animal body. At first glance, the figure appears modest and withdrawn. Her posture is composed, her gaze seemingly lowered towards her bare feet, recalling the conventions of nineteenth-century portraiture where women were often depicted as passive objects of observation. Yet as the viewer moves closer, the illusion collapses. Her eyes are not lowered at all. She is looking directly back. The delayed eye contact transforms the encounter. The viewer approaches believing they are safely observing a woman; instead, they realise they have been observed themselves. The work refuses the traditional power dynamic of portraiture, denying the comfort of anonymous spectatorship. Looking becomes a reciprocal act. For Cox, the painting considers humanity's persistent desire to separate itself from the rest of the animal kingdom. The title quietly undermines this distinction. A "mammal" is not another creature—it is us. The Sunday dress, rich with cultural associations of femininity, morality, and respectability, becomes an attempt to distinguish ourselves from nature. Yet clothing cannot alter biology. Beneath lace and ritual remains the same vulnerable animal body. The work also reflects on the historical relationship between women and nature. Across art, religion, and philosophy, women have repeatedly been positioned as closer to instinct, emotion, reproduction, and the body itself, while men have been aligned with reason, culture, and civilisation. Mammal in a Sunday Dress does not reject this comparison. Instead, it questions why proximity to nature has so often been treated as something lesser. Chiaroscuro isolates the figure within darkness, allowing the luminous dress to symbolise the performance of civilisation while the bare feet quietly return the body to the earth. Neither is presented as more truthful than the other. The painting exists in the tension between performance and instinct, refinement and biology. Mammal in a Sunday Dress ultimately asks a simple but unsettling question: if every layer of culture were stripped away, what would remain? Not a king. Not a saint. Not a gentleman or a lady. Only another mammal, looking back.
source
Is this anything
I propose an addition
Been thinking about this graph a little (actually been thinking about it a lot)
It was true.
Europeans, have you voted yet for the next bank bills designs?
https://surveys.ecb.europa.eu/10b/neweuro/
Yes I did!
On my way to do it!
No and I won't
No and I will
Not European but willing to participate
Not European and I don't care
Nuance (somehow)
Results
Europeans, have you voted yet for the next bank bills designs?
Yes I did!
On my way to do it!
No and I won't
No and I will
Not European but willing to participate
Not European and I don't care
Nuance (somehow)
Results
https://surveys.ecb.europa.eu/10b/neweuro/
this video has been the last hinge holding me together for weeks now. I need to watch it once a day or I'll start disintegrating
Terry Jones is playing a character dressed as a mortician (maybe?) from Monty Python's Flying Circus // S01E11: The Royal Philharmonic Orchestra Goes to the Bathroom. Choosing to interpret it in a positive way. says the following:
Are you nervy? Irritable? Depressed? Tired of Life? Keep it up!
He then winks at the camera (and you, dear person).
In other words, keep living!
you just teleported to the last game you played how is it going? {you're plot involved}
good
bad
great
awful
dead
I don't play games/results
Soma 😔
Marvel’s Midnight Suns. I suppose I could just stay at the Abbey, but I’m probably dead.
Welp.
Not bad.
Exploring THE darkest dungeon while getting some nice treasure.
After that: tea and scones!
Ramza: ...and save my sister.
...And save Ramza's sister.
I’ve noticed that when people talk about Monty Python, they don’t mention Carol Cleveland.
While she weren’t part of the main group, Carol played a massive role in their success and is a vital part of Monty Python as a whole. They don’t call her the Seventh Python for nothing!
Happy new year! Here's the end of the 1953 EC Comics adaptation of Ray Bradbury's "There Will Come Soft Rains," first published in Weird Fantasy #17.
Via @cirnineball
Today is August 5, 2026!
Happy There Will Come Soft Rains Day to all who celebrate!
it's meee I'm your guardian angel hiiiiii 😇 okay🙏 so. in about six months, you're gonna die of starvation. 🥺 and if I don't protect you, I will get: #fired! 🫢 and that is No Good 🙅♀️ hahaaa So. 🙏 I looked into causes of starvation, and it turns out: Your death is totally preventable! 😯 Uh oh! 😆 There's more than enough food to sustain you without interfering with anyone else's survival, but you're not allowed to have it! 🤨 Whaaat? 🤷♀️ Apparently, your death is premeditated by thousands of things called "shareholders." So. 🙏 I've been killing people,
soy yooo tu ángel de la guarda holiiiiii 😇 okay🙏 bueno. en como seis meses, vas a morir de hambre. 🥺 y si no te protejo, me van a: #¡despedir! 🫢 y eso No esta Chido 🙅♀️jajaaa Entonces. 🙏investigue acerca del tema y resulta que: ¡puedo prevenir tu muerte al 100%! 😯 ¡Uh oh! 😆 Hay más que suficiente comida para que sobrevivas sin que interfieras con la supervivencia de los demás, ¡pero no puedes teneral! 🤨 ¿Queeeé? 🤷♀️ Al parecer, tu muerte fue premeditada por miles de cosas llamadas "accionistas." Y bueno. 🙏 empeze a matar personas,
c'est moooi ton ange gardien coucooou 😇 bon 🙏 alors. dans genre six mois, tu vas mourir de faim. 🥺 et si je te protège pas, je vais me faire: #virer ! 🫢 et ça c'est pas Pas Super 🙅♀️ hahaaa Donc. 🙏 j'ai fait mes recherches sur les causes de famine et devine quoi: Ta mort est 100% évitable ! 😯 Oh-oh ! 😆 Il y a largement assez de ressources pour te nourrir sans interférer avec la survie d'autrui, mais tu n'y as pas accès ! 🤨 Quoooi ? 🤷♀️ Apparemment ta mort a été préméditée par des milliers de trucs appelées des "actionnaires". Du coup.🙏 j'ai tué pas mal de monde,
hiiiiii 😇 我是亲的守护小天使！okay🙏 嗯。您在差不多半年会饿死哈🥺 若我不能救您我会被#炒鱿鱼！🫢 那可不行哦🙅♀️ 哈哈。所以昵🙏我查了一下人类饿死的原因，然后发现：诶呀呀😯亲的死是可以避免哒！😆 这世上有足够食物给亲吃，一点儿也不需要影响别人的生存率哒！但不给亲！🤨 怎么会这样昵？ 🤷♀️ 原来，亲的死是被一帮叫“股东”的东西计算好滴！ 所以昵🙏 我杀了一些人，
y'all are doing some rosetta stone shit to me
Sou euuu, seu anjo da guarda, oiiiiii 😇 bom🙏 então. daqui a seis meses, você morrerá de fome. 🥺 e se eu não te proteger, vou ser: #demitido! 🫢 e isso Não É Bom 🙅♀️ ha-haaa Então. 🙏 Eu pesquisei as causas da fome e descobri: Sua morte é totalmente evitável! 😯 Oh-oh! 😆 Há comida mais que suficiente para sustentá-lo sem interferir na sobrevivência de ninguém, mas você não pode tê-la! 🤨 O quê? 🤷♀️ Aparentemente, a sua morte foi premeditada por milhares de coisas chamadas “acionistas”. Então. 🙏 Eu tenho matado pessoas,
Sou euuu, o teu anjo da guarda, olááá 😇 bem.🙏 então. daqui a seis meses, tu vais morrer de fome. 🥺 e se eu não te proteger, vou ser: #demitido! 🫢 e isso Não É Bom 🙅♀️ hahaaa Então. 🙏 Eu pesquisei as causas da fome e descobri: a tua morte é totalmente evitável! 😯 Oh-oh! 😆 Há comida mais que suficiente para te sustentar sem interferir na sobrevivência de ninguém, mas tu não podes tê-la! 🤨 O quê?! 🤷♀️ Aparentemente, a tua morte foi premeditada por milhares de coisas chamadas “acionistas”. Então. 🙏 Eu tenho matado pessoas,
Christian Broutin, from JCA Annual 8 (1989)
Trying to keep up with this made me feel like English wasn’t my native language
this is art
English, everybody!
